User talk:Bubblescubed

Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material, as you did with that maps article. http://whmap.com/environmental-practices/. It has been deleted.

Articles you create must be in your own words. See Your first article for further information. Thanks Gilliam (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "williams & Heintz Map Corporation"


A tag has been placed on "williams & Heintz Map Corporation", requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 06:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

About your business
Hey Bubblescubed and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions and edits. Please be informed that Wikipedia has strict policies about copyright issues. Please do not copy and paste texts from other websites to here in Wikipedia. That automatically violates Wikipedia's copyright violation policy. Please visit WP:CV or WP:CFAQ for more info about this issue. Also, in regards of if you have added a new article and it does not violate any copyright infringement, please make sure that the article meets WP:GNG, WP:CORP and WP:V.

Please consider to use the Article Wizard in starting new articles or you may also use a draft. Please visit Your first article for further info. Thanks and happy editing! :) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 06:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Williams & Heintz Map Corporation


A tag has been placed on Williams & Heintz Map Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Copy of message at article talk page
I've declined the speedy and changed one word. What is missing totally is references. Reliable independent sources WP:RS. I'll ask a good rescuer User:MelanieN if she'll help you. I think it still looks a bit company produced rather than encyclopaedic, but Melanie might be able to help there. If it goes, contact me and I'll restore it into user space for you. Peridon (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Melanie and I have looked through Google, and I'm afraid that neither of us can find anything that meets WP:RS. Without that, there's no point in doing a tidy-up. A last ditch thing would be to take the article to Articles for Deletion. This is a seven day discussion procedure about articles that may not meet our standards for inclusion. It isn't really for rescue work, but I've seen things I've nominated survive in much better condition than they went in. As I say, it's a last chance. If that fails, the only thing is for the company to get itself more noted in the places we consider reliable independent sources WP:RS. This means stuff like press articles about the company (that aren't thinly disguised press releases) in good papers, and so on. But that's for a future attempt, unless you can come up with something. Peridon (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)