User talk:Bubbless009

Welcome Bubbless009! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, Bubbless009. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Popped bubbles
I need admins as a necessary intervention for someone that won't follow instructions. They will make you do what I was unable to persuade you to. Crowsus (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

There is someone who keeps taking my edits. Bubbless009 (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Your recent editing history at Association football positions shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 16:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

But I was right. I don’t get it. Bubbless009 (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

But I was right. I don’t get it. Bubbless009 (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Pls stop. Your talk page says you are a football fan. Surely you should know these positions. Bubbless009 (talk) 16:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GiantSnowman 18:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Bubbless009. I just wanted to ask how to make it clear this edit named ‘additional information’ is constructive. Please get back to me as soon as possible. Bubbless009 (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AFC-CONCACAF Cup
Hello Bubbless009,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AFC-CONCACAF Cup for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 19:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)