User talk:Bubbly1558

Welcome
 Hello, Bubbly1558, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Bubbly1558, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your self-promotion on Wikipedia
Please stop adding your own novels to Wikipedia. if you continue to do so, you will be reported to administrators and may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Softlavender (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

I find this rude, and I think you don't need to police Wikipedia in such a way. Everything I have added in my edits is true and verifiable, and fully relevant to and noteworthy for the subject of the encycolpedia pages. There is nothing wrong with saying certain literary works exist, when they do, and there is evidence to show that they do. There is no self-promotion in the text of my edits, any more than there is in any of the other listings of such works as I list.

The definition in Wikipedia of self-promotion is:

Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable.

All my edits are from a nuetral point of view.

Bubbly1558 (talk) 00:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Softlavender (talk) 00:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh my ...
Goodness, I really have more important things to do with my time than this. I therefore bow out to your superior persistence. Bubbly1558 (talk) 01:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Shirt58 (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * "Adding the existence of two books to three Wikipedia articles (one on one page and one on two other pages) hardly, I think, qualifies for an accusation of having put them on 'multiple pages'." Bubbly1558 added his self-published books to five different articles, and repeatedly edit-warred to keep them there, even after two warnings not to: . -- Softlavender (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

That is actually true. My apologies. I had completely forgotten one (the general list of adaptations or classic works). If my edits were ever deleted from there, I did not even go back in to check. For one of the others, I reconsidered the relevance of my edit to the overall content of the page, and was happy with the removal, and again did not reenter it. Hence my remark about 'three'; and I maintain the rest of my case, that the edits were reasonable where I eventually placed them. Bubbly1558 (talk) 06:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)