User talk:Bubblyian

Madness
Welcome to the madhouse; please say hello

Welcome
Hi, Bubblyian. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  18:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ian Tyes
I have nominated Ian Tyes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ian Tyes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Moved your Ian Tyes draft
I moved your draft of an Ian Tyes article to User:Bubblyian/Ian Tyes draft. Hope you don't mind. For draft articles, consider using subpages (see Subpages) in the future. Your user page (see User page) should be able you as the editor and should not really look like an encyclopedia article. Also please do not use encyclopedia categories on your user page (see Categorization), as it contaminates the encyclopedia categories with your drafts. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me but please read the policies and guidelines I've link to beforehand. Jason Quinn (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Secondary parent


A tag has been placed on Secondary parent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Secondary parent and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Primary parent


A tag has been placed on Primary parent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Primary parent and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Secondary carers


A tag has been placed on Secondary carers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Secondary carers and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Secondary carer


A tag has been placed on Secondary carer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Secondary carer and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Winner takes all (benefits)
I have nominated Winner takes all (benefits), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Winner takes all (benefits). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)