User talk:Bubu hazarika006

February 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ra.One. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 08:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bubu hazarika006


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Bubu hazarika006 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you have done nothing here except for spamming and vandalism. Coming to Wikipedia to post self-promotional vanity pages is something which many people do in all innocence, because they don't realise that doing so is unacceptable. It is normal to post a message to such an editor explaining the situation, so that they can avoid making the same mistake again. In your case, however, there is no "mistake", and nothing was done "in all innocence"; you knew full well what you were doing, vandalising numerous pages by posting spam totally unrelated to the subjects of those pages. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ponyo bons mots 18:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)