User talk:Buckosucko212

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gromlakh (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Gromlakh (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Led Zep
Hi, You added back the subheading "The Biggest Band in the World". Since this is an encyclopedia, there is not supposed to be personal opinions. If you have a major, reputable source that called them that (e.g., the cover of Rolling Stone or something), then put it in the article. Then the subheading would be justifiable, because it is referring to the magazine cover.OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Oxymoron83 20:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Bookkeeper  (of the Occult)  00:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Vsmith (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to I Dream of Jesus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 04:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Paranoid (album) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!- hexa Chord 2  23:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 23:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''It's not relevant. ''  Simon  \\  KSK  Yes we can! 02:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Crunch

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Crunch (talk)

June 2012, 1940s
...Modernist (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC) All you need to do is click on the name and youll see that the person was born in the 40's. Why do you always find it necessary to delete the stuff i put on here man.

Edit Warring at 1940s
I count 5 reverts between you and the IP...Modernist (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ...Modernist (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DMacks (talk) 10:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)