User talk:Bucsolp

talk with me

Welcome!
Hello, Bucsolp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Murry1975 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Bucsolp. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tower Hamlets College, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 21:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Plain and simple
You are a teacher at the school, you continually add through IPs and this SPA unsourced quite favourable edits. Stop. Also my edit had an edit summary, so thats a falsehood. Murry1975 (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:DONTBITE is good, so is COI and everything I told you as an IP. You are not new you are recurring. Murry1975 (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Actually, i am not that ip.


 * Then one last time for your benefit,
 * We do not link everything WP:OVERLINK
 * We do not use flags in inofobxes WP:MOSFLAG
 * We do not use peacock phrases or any other expressions to big-up something
 * And we use sources, as you alluded to yet fail to give. Murry1975 (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)