User talk:Buddy23Lee/2016 Archive

Category:Open source philosophy has been nominated for discussion
Category:Open source philosophy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Are you actually trying to get consensus at Generation X?
Since this article was just reported at WP:AN3 any further edits are under a microscope. You've just made a new edit that might appear to be continuation of the war. I don't notice anyone on talk supporting this change. Consider reverting yourself until such time as at least one person expresses support. Or wait a decent interval before restoring similar material. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I made those edits specifically with the other editors opinion in mind, insofar as he or she would convey it. Consensus at this point is not waiting for the normally reasoned and active discussion amongst many to yield some direction, it is simply satisfying the tastes of one other editor. Since he or she does not seem overly interested in dialog but does clearly possess a willingness to revert or remove content, I figured that operating under WP:CYCLE was going to be the most likely way out of this conflict, without it stalling out in waiting for a reply that might never come. I wasn't planning on finding assistance should my edits be reverted again, but instead working through it. Given the apparent impunity the other editor has had in flaunting the 3RR rule, I realize it's up to me and me alone to work this out and that's exactly what I'm trying to do. I apologize for wasting your time in reporting this; you don't have to worry about it anymore, we'll work it out. Thanks. Buddy23Lee (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gelitin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Third Opinion Decline - no substantive discussion yet
I have removed your request at Third opinion on the grounds that there hasn't yet been a thorough discussion at the Talk page link you had provided, as required. Once that has occurred you are welcome to re-list the discussion. You are also welcome to pursue other forms of dispute resolution. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Maintenance collaboration of the week
Hello! I'm interested in reviving the Maintenance collaboration of the week and noticed that you're a member of the Uncategorized Task Force, which does similar tasks. Would you be interested in helping to restart the Maintenance collaboration of the week up again? Chickadee46 (talk&#124;contribs) 00:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)