User talk:BuffaloSoldier716

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jason Dawe (ice hockey) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jason Dawe (ice hockey) was changed by BuffaloSoldier716 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878734 on 2019-10-18T03:32:12+00:00

Speedy deletion nomination of Elyse Smith


A tag has been placed on Elyse Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Largoplazo (talk) 00:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elyse Smith


The article Elyse Smith has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I declined a speedy request because there's a good faith claim of importance, but in searching for more sources to show notability I'm coming up short."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Fabrictramp &#124;  talk to me  00:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Elyse Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elyse Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elyse Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

She is a legitimate professional and I believe this article is useful and new information will be provided within article in the future BuffaloSoldier716 (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

If you want the administrator who eventually closes the discussion to take your comments into consideration, you have to make them at the discussion, linked above. Note that the rationale for deletion isn't based on doubts as to her legitimacy or her professional status but on an assessment of her "notability" as that term is defined on Wikipedia. Simply being a legitimate professional is insufficient to qualify as the subject of an article. The fact of being on television also doesn't suffice. Largoplazo (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

She is a legitimate professional and I believe this article is useful and new information will be provided within article in the future BuffaloSoldier716 (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

If you want the administrator who eventually closes the discussion to take your comments into consideration, you have to make them at the discussion, linked above. Note that the rationale for deletion isn't based on doubts as to her legitimacy or her professional status but on an assessment of her "notability" as that term is defined on Wikipedia. Simply being a legitimate professional is insufficient to qualify as the subject of an article. The fact of being on television also doesn't suffice. Largoplazo (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)