User talk:Buffs/Archive 2

OLDAG07
Exams weren't too bad. might have something close to a 4.0 this semester. gradation is friday. thanks for your concern. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oldag07 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC).

Flag
Thank you for your kind comments. I'm just an old-fashioned American. :) Wahkeenah 00:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

BlueAg09
Thanks for the reward sir! Finals went well, and I'm glad the semester's over with. How's the Air Force treating you? Those stories are hilarious, thanks for the laughs. By the way, thank you for all the hard work you put in to the A&M articles. With the push for FA status, we can show the world what a fine institution A&M is.

Thought you might like this on your userpage:


 * I'm not in the Corps, but I had I chose another major outside of engineering, I would have joined it. I was in marching band throughout high school, so I probably would have joined the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band. Blue Ag09  (Talk) 21:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

GA
Thought I'd return the favor. Thanks for the medal, and thanks so much for organizing the GA and FA push! Karanacs 14:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

A&M images
You like it? A generous Aggie on Flickr uploads all his images under the CC-Attribution license. I put that image on the Aggie Band page, but I don't think I put the proper caption. Blue Ag09  (Talk) 22:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

ThanksOldag07 01:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye
I'm leaving Wikipedia because I have too little friends. Bye. :( --Defend er 9 11  22:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * What are their names and just how tall are they? >:) Wahkeenah 22:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Campus
So what do you think about creating the campus article? Look under "Residential life possibilities" to see what I'm talking about.  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Related content dispute
Given our discussion on the Talk:B-1 Lancer page over the inclusion on the Boeing 2707, you might want to look at User talk:BillCJ. An long-time WP:AIR editor who took a nearly two-year hiatus is back, and wants to restrict the "related development" field to just immediately-related designs, per this diff. Thanks. - BillCJ 16:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

See Also Section
What section in WP:MoS concerns "See Also". Maybe we could define that section for articles that aren't another A&M article. -- Hut101 01:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

History Section
If you are talking about the discussion about how to word the sentence involving the number of Aggies serving in World War II, I agree with your new word choice. If you could back that up with some sort of article discussing the reasoning behind the formation of the Former Student Association as it relates to this particular issue that would be even better. -- Hut101 12:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

A&M Work - need help?
You seem overextended on the A&M stuff. If you want to pass on any of the sections that you volunteered for, let me know and I'll work on it tonight. Karanacs 19:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Enjoy your break -- you deserve it! You are probably the most qualified for the Corps section and it's fine with me if you take traditions.  I'll put my thinking cap on for athletics and I'll work on activities too, since I just noticed it was now unassigned. Karanacs 19:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Univ of OK FA candidate
You deleted some comments (one was mine). Can you please restore them? Thanks! --ElKevbo 04:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Senior Military College
Thanks BQZ, I stand corrected in my correction of IP poster. --Claygate 04:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem, will help review and check off a section of the article. Although I didn't go to A&M (am an Oklahoma State Aggie), our son-in-law is an Aggie and I've learned a lot from him and by contributing to the article. --Claygate 13:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * He graduated A&M 10 years ago in pre-med and got his MD at UT-Med school in Houston (but not tu). Currently he's a flight surgeon in the USAF. --67.142.130.24 23:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC) (this is Claygate but can't login now for some reason)


 * I figured as much. At least he didn't go to that overglorified junior college in Austin... — BQZip01 —  talk 23:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Out of town message
Sorry, i was out of town without internet connection for about a week. Ill see if i can get some more pictures, and read over it a few more times.Oldag07 19:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Finish Texas A&M University article
I will be glad to help. I'll read it over, comparing it to FA guidelines, and post my feedback on the article's discussion page. All of you have done a lot of work. If it's not FA-grade now, it shouldn't take very much to get it there. --Wordbuilder 20:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Notable people list
Way to go on finding this list. I was wondering why we didn't have many people in business. I'll add those people onto the notable people article soon.  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I did mean the notable people article.  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

"Updates" on riddle...
Super long list of questions answered. Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 19:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You are correct (and it took you how many guesses...). Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just one. — BQZip01 —  talk 21:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Add picts
Note to self, download & upload
 * http://flickr.com/photos/brentf/434281284/in/pool-19789280@N00/ -- This one is copyrighted. Make sure the images have the right license on them. (Click on license to the right of the photo page.)  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * http://flickr.com/photos/stuseeger/328605688/in/pool-19789280@N00/
 * http://flickr.com/photos/msarz/391615106/in/pool-19789280@N00/

Texas A&M
Sorry, I've been out of town since Friday, visiting an Aggie friend in Austin. It looks like you guys have done lots of work in my absence! I'm sorry if I was the one adding double spaces; I didn't mean to, which doesn't mean I didn't do it on accident. I've read through the article again and added my signoff to several sections. I thought the article was in great shape before you kicked off this round of changes, but I am wowed now. This is an extremely thorough article, without a lot of unnecessary detail, and it reads very well. I also took a look through the FA criteria on our subpage again, and it looks like we've covered everything. I only had one question -- Reference 84 points to Keepers of the Spirit, but it doesn't look like the citation is complete (no page number, author name, etc). Other than that, I think we are ready for FA submission :). Will you do the honors, please?  Karanacs 01:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

New userbox for you
Its true! :) --Defend er 9 11  10:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

FA Status, Here We Come
I agree with your list of the order we should cut, if necessary. Thanks for getting so much done last night even after the celebrating ;) 216.99.65.10 13:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Turns out my cookie died. Above message was from Karanacs 13:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I think we are doing really well.  We got two people in support of us so far.  we are only 5000 bites longer then duke, but we are a whole university system and are significantly larger population and landwise.  I think the extra 5000 bites is jusitified.  Got to my parents home (Dallas) from BCS a few days and have been bored.  probably why i have made almost too many edits.  good stuff. as for wikipedia, well, I am here for texas a&m only.  Writing is not a strong suit for me.  Good luck.  Thanks and gig em!  Oldag07 02:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * going to nominate our article in the wikiproject Texas and universities for featured article statues. that should attract more reviewers to read our article.  just got to beat ou.  think about how those sippers will feel when they realize that ou and a&m get fa status before they do.  :-) Oldag07 05:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * been messaging past reviews of our site to come back and review us again. i messaged the guy who announced that we got the good article status.  he has given is some good stuff.  I just messaged the people who gave us advice on our peer review the following. 
 * Howdy! First of, I on behalf of the editors of the Texas A&M University page would like to thank you for taking the time to peer review our page.  We have made a whole lot of changes since the last peer review.  We have obtained good article status, and we are a FA nominee.  We were just wondering if you could give us a few more comments because of the enormous amount of changes we have made.  Thank you so much for your help.  As we say at our school Thanks, and Gig em Oldag07 02:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you have any ideas of who else to message up? I want to get this FA thing done. we already have had 4 people in support our nomination no people opposing it.  Oldag07 02:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just be patient, Raul will close it shortly especially as its been reviewed and you've addressed issues when asked. There really isnt any need to chase further opinions whether you have 4 or 40 comments all supporting its still a consensus. Gnangarra 11:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted References
Sorry about that, I thought Hopgood covered it all. I've added back the missing reference, so it should be good now :) Karanacs 20:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

UO
LOL, I did notice that when I was looking through the FA candidate page. You got 'em good!  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

2010 class
Thanks for the information, not being from the "states" there are somethings especially with the school system that I know very little beyond the media interpretations. The advantages in that is when reviewing unexplained and local terminology stand out. Maybe a supporting article to explain the use of it, how its socially developed etc then you could revert back knowing that its clearly explain. BTW I found the article informative, its a credit yourself and the other editors who put the effort in. Gnangarra 05:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

OU
removed a bunch of deadwood phrases on the OU site. I am assuming some OU people are going to look at my talk page to thank me. so i deleted your message. just to let you know. btw, lets not try to burn our bridges with other sites. your review was correct and all, but be careful. gig em! Oldag07 23:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * i already did, but I mostly did my hard nosed deadwood phrase removal, and converted much of the phrases from a passive voice to an active one. Oldag07 03:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Working on that page dug up a fact that you might want to know, and might be good for one of our pages. a&m won the Sudler Trophy in 2001.  i'll give you the honors of posting that up considering the fact and in the band toothat and your year was 2001 too.   Oldag07 13:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

12th Man pic
Isn't the picture a bit too large? What do you say if we remove it for now, and I retake a better shot once I return to Aggieland and upload it on June 3rd? I think the picture we have now is fine on the 12th man article, but probably not on the A&M article as it takes up a lot of room. I actually had the original picture deleted on Wikicommons since copyrighted stuff isn't allowed on there. Then I accidentally deleted it...D'oh!  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 08:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

bomb comment
LOL. That's a good one. reply on my talk page. Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

More is there. Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

A belated thank you
This has been an extremely difficult month, in the wake of my sister's passing, and I cannot tell you how much it meant to me, how reassuring, it was when I got home from the two week roadtrip to Florida and South Carolina, to find that an un-acquaintance, only known through the magic of the web, had left such a thoughtful and kind message.

My sincerest thanks! Bless you!

Sub* Mark Sublette 23:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette 23:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Daylight saving time FAC review
Thanks for your FAC review comments about Daylight saving time. I changed the article and responded to your comments at the end of Featured article candidates/Daylight saving time. Eubulides 02:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Customising names
I cant find any way of customising my user tag could you direct me to the page? Peace keeper II 22:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Bullshit
Sorry for the comment to defender911 about bullshit (my mom made the comment while I was away from the computer) --Cbennett0811 17:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Texas A&M University and vacations
Hi BQ. I just wanted to let you know that I probably won't be around to help much with the A&M article for the next two weeks. My husband and I are taking a long-overdue toddler-free vacation and most likely won't be near a computer. I had hoped that our FA status would have been decided one way or another by now, but at least there doesn't seem to be a lot of requested changes anymore, which is probably a good thing. I'll probably be spending a little bit of time online this weekend, but then that will be it until about June 18th. Good luck with the article and I'll be checking in again when I get back :) Karanacs 15:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Plug-in hybrid
What kind of currency changes are you suggesting? BenB4 06:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your help. I have done as many of your suggestions as I can.  I am sorry I came off as rude.  Do you think that the non-breaking space discourages editing? BenB4 07:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, you said four paragraphs was too long when WP:LEAD says 3 or 4. BenB4 07:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Question
I don't know if you play video games, but I said in the article if you lose, you restart. How excatly do I reference that? I have heard of referencing the game itself, but I've only done that once before quite a while ago, and I don't remember how. Otherwise I don't know many people who would challenge "the player must retire and restart the race." Do you think I should reference the game anyway?--Clyde (talk) 04:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't own the manual, but I will see what I can do. Maybe even open it up to VG if they know a website that has photocopies of manuals, I'm not sure.--Clyde (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with you (I completely forgot about the manual), and would prefer to have it, read through it, add more to gameplay, and properly cite things using the manual. I'm still looking around, and I would almost being willing to pay the 99 cents to buy it off of ebay.--Clyde (talk) 03:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

FUR
Image:Texas AMU logo.png doesn't have a fair use rationale. I was actually impressed with the FUR for the first image. I left similar GA comments at almost all of the passed educational institutions for lack of FURs. The article looks really good, I don't know how this FUR was missed. --Nehrams2020 07:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Our Page got FA Status
The bot hasn't come though, but according to one the influential FA editor SandyGeorgia (see my talk page), we got it Oldag07 22:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, Thanks again for leading the charge. not exactly sure how to do that "barnstar" thingy.  I guess it is not my type of thing.  Anyways, Thanks and Gig em Oldag07 03:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

TAMU articles
That sounds super. We can definitely boost up A&M's reputation through here. Besides, Wikipedia is one of the top ten most visited websites globally. Imagine how many people will read the articles!  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 02:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Texas A&M Pictures
I am not sure if you know about this, but here are some good pictures of A&M, including a good band one. maybe a replacement for the one in our site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_of_Texas_A%26M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lone_Star_Showdown_2006_TAMU_band.jpg

Slocum's edits
I don't know if you noticed this, but a while back Slocum edited his own article. I thought I would point this out to you. My theory is he was bored one day sitting on his desk in the Administration Building and googled his name. The wiki article turned out to be the first result!  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 05:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

personal page
This is the most amusing user page I´ve come across... (dots used so as not to end with a preposition)--Xareu bs 17:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Karmichael Hunt
Could you peer review Karmichael Hunt? It would be much appreciated.

Article - Karmichael Hunt Peer review - Peer review/Karmichael Hunt

Thanks. SpecialWindler 01:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I looked on WP:PR and you gave a very detailed review another article and therefore asked you. I am looking for detailed reviews because I'd like to get Karmichael Hunt to FA. Thanks. SpecialWindler 21:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but you did say you'd do later toady/tomorrow. SpecialWindler 21:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Response to your peer review
I know you haven't completed, but per Manual of Style (biographies) I think the date of birth should be there. SpecialWindler 22:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have done as much as your peer review has requested/reviewed but there a a few thing I don't understand which I have commented and has a ❌ next to them.Special Windler talk 01:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review.


 * ✅I have merged most of the "short, choppy" sentences
 * ✅ The image [[Image:Karmichael Hunt training.jpg]] is not fair use because he is living, so it will be removed. I took your suggestion of club logo etc, and put one of Australia. I don't know if the [[Image:Brisbane Broncos 2000.jpg]] is fair used on this page, but I'll see. I'm trying to get a free image of Hunt playing league.
 * I am seriously lost in the apostrophies section. I don't know if you want to or have the time, but it would be much appreciated if you did this. (though you don't)
 * ✅ Hopefully all the references arn't mid sentence any more.
 * I don't get the whole "passive voice" thingo. I understand it, but why?
 * ✅ Wikified all dates
 * It seems I start to many sentences with either "Hunt" or "he", this arcording to User:Awadewit makes it "seem repetitive when actually it is not", but I don't know how to differ it?

Special Windler  12:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

PS. I am not very good at english.
 * Which you probably figured out. Special  Windler  12:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thanks. I'm actually at peace with it, and plan on nominating again. Probably work on the prose, and find the last reference I need first.--Clyde (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I actually am using Mozilla Firefox right now. I don't know how updated it is, nor if I put certain settings that would disable spell check, but it doesn't work for me.--Clyde (talk) 18:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll look into it though, thanks.--Clyde (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

9/11 conspiracy talk page
Sorry this took so long to get back to you. I guess it's a judgement call...talking about how issues fit into the article is one thing but just arguing over how steel reacts to fires is a little off topic (as regards to the article). We're not trying to come to any conclusions about that kind of research, all we should be talking about is how/if some research fits into the article. I know it can be a little bit of a grey area but those pages go sideways so often sometimes it's good to just nip it in the bud...I don't do it too often though! Thanks for the note. RxS 15:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The Penn and Teller thing is great, I first saw it on The West Wing of all places. As far as I'm concerned, it says all there needs to be said about what Freedom of Speech really means and should be required viewing for all Americans. As far as the other thing, maybe I should rephrase it. We shouldn't be debating how steel reacts in different environments, we should be debating what reliable and verifiable sources say about how steel reacts. That's the crucial difference: one is debating and judging what belongs in an encyclopedia, the other is what amounts to original research where we all chime in on how we think material would have acted under the circumstances. Anyway, I don't know if that makes sense but that's how I saw it when I closed that section. RxS 04:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Oldag07
Unloaded my suggestions on the Aggie Band page. Good luck. Oldag07 16:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Good stuff. I am not one for technical stuff like references.  I like it.  I could do some minor trimming and i think you addressed my concerns Oldag07 21:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Aggie Band
Why not put it up for peer review? You'll get more insight from other editors.  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 17:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Date linking in Duke Talk page
Can you please correct your broken examples in the Duke Talk page? 1-12-2007 is not a correct way to wikilink a full date. I'm not bothered your mistake (I make them all of the time!) but it does seem to have possibly confused at least one new(er) editor. Thanks and happy editing! --ElKevbo 21:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I'm not trying to pick on you or nitpick - I promise!  --ElKevbo 21:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikiprojects
What type of maintenence is needed on a wikiproject Oldag07 21:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Aggie band
This picture Image:1st Aggie Band 1894.gif, doesn't have a pic? Otherwise it's a good article. Special Windler  09:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry it's my preferences. Special  Windler  10:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You may want to put a pic in the top right corner of the article (or in infobox). Special  Windler  10:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your help with Karmichael Hunt (pity I can't return the favour), I'm just waiting for a good copyedit of the article (which will take some time, and I get p***** off with it) and a few pics and I will nominate it for FA, thanks. Special  Windler  10:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't normally contribute to FAC's because I'm not the greatest reviewer in the world. I could say Support if there are other supports and I can say per above or blah blah blah's comments. Special  Windler  10:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ps. You may want to start archiving your talk page as it takes some time to load. Special  Windler  10:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Tceh spelling and A&M ma+h
Thought you might like these. The only thing as bad as Red Raider spelling is Aggie math (Example 1, Example 2. --Wordbuilder 17:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * On my talk page, you wrote, "As for the score, that ain't right (the website says otherwise) and would be easy to manipulate in a simple graphic editing program like Paint. On top of that, the total wins and losses is the same and that is not how the page looks, so it clearly was altered a little, probably by some techie with too much time on his hands..."
 * Nope, it wasn't altered. The web page did show it as a "W" but has apparently since been corrected. I made the screen capture myself using SnagIt 8, which accounts for the nifty torn edges. I would have taken the whole page but it's too long and I didn't want to piece it together and shrink it. The only modifications I made were pasting in the page's address and putting the red box around the point of interest. You can argue I have too much time on my hands but I am honest. --Wordbuilder 21:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Texas A&M Wikiproject
Starting the groundwork for a Texas A&M wikiproject. I can't promise ill be active in it. I am sure future aggie wikipedians will pick it up. I just made a list of wikipedia entries that are a&m related. please add on, and organize. Talk:Texas_A%26M_University/WPPrep as for the project itself. I think i will start it once Karanacs comes back. WikiProject  Proposed it with the wikiproject council. Put your name down if you are interested in joining Proposal I think after i make this project, of course i will remain sort of active with this group, but i am not just and Aggie. I have many more interests. I think i am going to help bring the Star Trek page to FA status. Gig em Oldag07 03:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * We have to add articles to the wikiproject first. the counter will start working.  a bot goes though every day or so to update the counter.  of course i am not sure if are stuff is working yet.  we will see in the next couple of days.

To add an article to our page,


 * Add: WikiProject Texas A&M
 * Strike off this list: Talk:Texas A&M University/WPPrep

Unicorn Painting
What's the significance of the Unicorn painting that this guy keeps adding to the A&M article? He says it's not trivia, but it certainly looks like it in the context of the article? Can you please add a judgment to that. He made it difficult to correct those bad numbers that another anon user added, but I got those removed finally. I'm guessing it's just a troll. Thanks. --Claygate 17:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting that. On further review I noticed the originating user has vandalized this page before with nastier edits and then blanked his talk page to hide the history. One of those embarrassing sips.  I reported to admin intervention due to blanking. --Claygate 14:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: WP:TAMU statistics help
Hi – Have patience, my young Aggie padawan.

'Article Statistics' links to a summary page by quality at Version_1.0_Editorial_Team. Every WikiProject with stats links to that page. Since your project is new, WP 1.0 bot hasn't had a chance to update it yet. Tag some talk pages and wait – it only updates our stats every two weeks so it will probably be a week or more before you get an update on the main project page. Have fun tagging stuff, and let me know if you need anything else! - Krakatoa  Katie  16:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Talk Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas A&M
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas A&M, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas A&M is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas A&M, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Talk Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas A&M itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
You're gonna have to be a little more specific --Closedmouth 04:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Texas A&M --Closedmouth 04:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Check the deletion log. The explanation is right there. --Closedmouth 05:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

FTAB
I changed to support -- thanks for being so quick with the changes I requested. I hope you don't think I'm too picky, but I'm part of the Wikiproject Biography so I tend to be a stickler for the naming rules. You did a great job on the article--I learned things about the band that I didn't know. As for my vacation, my lips are sealed, but thanks for asking ;) Karanacs 20:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

List of A&M people
Hi BQ, I was wondering if you could help me out on the lead in the List of Texas A&M University people article. Is there anything in the lead that is missing or can be expanded on more?  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 21:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations -- that was a very short FA review!!! :) Karanacs 18:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Congratulations on Fightin' Texas Aggie Band making FA status. I did look a thte article, but given Alan's (Akredeki) comments, had nothing new to add. Btw, if you need voluteers to read the article to past and present band members, I'd be happy to help. :) - BillCJ 19:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats on 2 Aggie FA's
Congrats on getting the A&M and Fightin' Texas Aggie Band both up to FA status. As you have probably noticed, I have not been around much in the past few weeks. Off-wiki stuff just keeps interfering! I hope to be around more soon to admire your great work! Johntex\talk 21:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats and you're welcome for the assistance. --Claygate 22:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Yea
I am trying to back off wikipedia too. i got a summer job, and really i just need some change in my life. I am in a funk good luck with everything. see ya. Oldag07 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

i think you should post this on the band page: featured article  this template gives you the star on the article. Oldag07 22:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

First off:
 * The bot updates the infobox, we update the page. I was the privileged one who put up the star on the Texas A&M main page.
 * As for the articles that fall under the radar, That is what the project is for. if you have any articles that you feel need to be added add the wikiproject, and update the list.  Wikiproject Texas A&M
 * One goal that our wikiproject could do is shoot for featured topic status.  Only one university got that,  Michigan State.  The criteria seems to favor smaller topics.  But we don't have to make all our articles FA's, it seems like most of the major articles must be GA'S.
 * Best of luck. Yea, i don't plan of being very active anymore.  I had a lot of free time, so i got into it.  I  got ticked off by some of the comments on the UT page.  Pretty much why i became a wikipedian.  i  guess i will take my name off the inactive list.  I feel like I am letting everyone down, but yes. wikipedia, is a very low priority/ hobby of mine.  although, wikipedia is a lot more enjoyable then texags.  the company is worldsbetter.  Oldag07 01:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:1st_Aggie_Band_1894.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:1st_Aggie_Band_1894.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Karmichael Hunt
Congrats on your featured article.

On Karmichael Hunt, thanks for all your help. I may soon put this up for FAC but

I'm thinking about restructing the article, like on this page. (note it isn't formatted, etc.). Do you have an opinion or objection.

Could you reply on my talk page, as I will unlikely remember to look here. Thanks.  SpecialWindler   talk  06:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Margate F.C.
Thanks for the kind words! ChrisTheDude 07:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Starting 2 core Texas A&M Pages
I created chimera test articles from different articles for new pages that I have suggested should we choose to go for the featured topic award. Most of what i did was copy and paste. none of the sections flow.
 * Academics of Texas A&M University
 * Student Life of Texas A&M University

I need some suggestions on where to continue. especially on student life, although we could expand some of the colleges.

remember to get featured topic status just have to get them to GA status. i don't think these articles are FA type articles anyways. Thanks for your help. Oldag07 12:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Well i am trying to back off wikipedia too. but i will make contributions here and there.
 * Academics does not show distinctiveness very well, but It is probably the easier one of the two to write. it would allow us to put lot more information than cut during the fa nomination. see Michigan State University academics. it is a middle man type article.  most of the information on it is already on Wikipedia. But it is disorganized.  we probably couldn't make it an FA quality article, no.  but it could be a solid GA article.  featured topics seem to be more going for comprehensiveness over quality.

my free time just went down the drain too. back to the real world. Oldag07 23:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * btw, Good luck with pilot training. i am glad you are doing better medically.  Oldag07 23:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)