User talk:Buggie111/November 2009-May 2010

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the new article announcements and the project discussion page. You might even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:00, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

I have yet to tell you how my account was born. LOL. I posted somthuing in the village pump two days ago, and was suspected of being a sock puppet. But, enough with that. I am now currently trying to expand the article on Bronnitsy ( my Russian hometown) by translating it from Russian to English.
 * Well, best of luck with the translation! This kind of work is always appreciated.  If you need help or have questions, don't hesitate to post on WT:RUSSIA, or feel free to contact me directly.  Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:30, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Shane Day
Hiya, thanks for volunteering to work on Shane Day. His official bio hasn't been posted at yet, but here's the link to his cached 49ers bio:



Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I know talking to a bot is stupid, but I remembered that one second after I saved and placed it in immedietly. Whoops, forgot to sign Buggie111 (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Kirill [talk] [prof] 04:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

NetCollect
Maybe having two templates will get it deleted faster... Supertouch (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the help Buggie111 (talk) 15:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review
Thanks for asking me. Your edits tell me you have made a good begining, and I am sure that you will keep up the good work. Cheers.-Shahab (talk) 11:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Adoption offer
Hello! My name is Strdst grl, and if you are interested I would be happy to adopt you. You can find out more about me through my user page and my userboxes, and you can reply to this message either at my talk page or my adoption page. strdst_grl  (call me Stardust) 16:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * If you would rather wait for a specific editor (I don't mind if you do), I suggest you post messages asking about adoption to their talk pages and add the adoptme template back on to your user page to show you are still waiting for more offers. Then you can get back to me in a few days if nothing comes of it. strdst_grl   (call me Stardust) 09:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, I don't really know why I asked to be adopted. To be certain, my questions have already been answered by me staring at the MoS page for 5 hours. So, I don't see the need for it.

Buggie111 (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Moscow Monorail Transit System
Hello! Your submission of Moscow Monorail Transit System  at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Intelligent  sium  01:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Responded. Buggie111 (talk) 01:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Added comments at T:TDYK. Materialscientist (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Spam
re user talk:Altenmann: Please always indicate which wikipedia article you are referring to. I tend to have no idea what I did 3 hours ago :-) As for galleries, see Gallery tag. - Altenmann >t 05:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Some months agou I tested out three gallery methods, you can see the result at User:Redrose64/Sandbox4. Click "edit" tab to see how they were done. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, those should teach me.

Buggie111 (talk) 13:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review
In case you forgot to put it on your watchlist, I've left you an editor review. I'm sorry it took so long, but there seems to be a large backlog of people lately. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 01:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh Holy Grace! I'll read it right now.

Thank you, Buggie111 (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Just added my update to it. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 13:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I have also left you a quick review, with suggestions of other locations you could help out. Hope this helps, contact me if you have any questions at all. Happy editing, --Taelus (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

re Redirecting a skeleton
Hi. I am unable to redirect an ip account page. This is because the ip is not tied to you, the editor, and may be used by another editor at some future date. The notice on the ip talkpage notes that it belongs to an ISP's pool, so this is quite likely. As long as you edit appropriately with this account, then there is no need to look at edits from earlier ip addresses. I hope this answers your query. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. And I will not make any more good of the order edits.

Buggie111 (talk) 13:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Metro list
Hi, Buggie! I think your best bet would be to present this new format at WP:SOVMETRO. I am not a member of that project, but I think its participants would be interested to look at your proposal.

If you want my personal opinion, though, I think that upgrading the list is a good idea overall, but I don't quite like the implementation. For my tastes, there's too much pink, the table borders are too thick, the navigational template could use some cleanup, and the table layout still needs work. But I think you are on the right track with this. Hope this helps. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:41, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Set Sail   For The   Seven Seas   317° 19' 15" NET   21:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Superbowl Summary
you can do that im working on the scores ''' Kreyg Talk''' 23:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

SUPERBOWL
im not creating the game summary ''' Kreyg Talk''' 00:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Trustworthiness:Vendor reliability:Privacy:Child safety:

Meaning, you don't want me to make it, or that you yourself aren't making it, and someone else will.

Which one?

Buggie111 (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Super Bowl Drive Chart
I'm curious, what do you think it should include? I'll look at previous games for guidance. Doc Quintana (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SkyBonTalk/Contributions 09:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your RfA Support
User: - Thanks for your participation and support in my recent successful RfA. Your confidence and trust in me is much appreciated. As a new admin I will try hard to keep from wading in too deep over the tops of my waders, nor shall I let the Buffalo intimidate me.--Mike Cline (talk) 09:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

When I first looked at the picture, I didn't know what a Green Beret was doing in the middle of the Great Plains. But I understand it now. Good Luck with the mop.

Buggie111 (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
If you are watching my talk page already, please let me know and I won't continue to tb template you. :) Taelus (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from the article on Moscow monorail
I do not think that this is a good idea. The section is supposed to have a brief, but complete overview of Russian monorail design. I will expand these sentences later. SA ru (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC) I know. It just looked like as if it wouldn't be expanded. Buggie111 (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Reach Out to the Truth 22:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage a few days ago, it was so fast and efficient I didn't even notice it till now! Happy editing, --Taelus (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

National varieties of English
Hi!. Just a short note to let you know I have reverted this edit of yours made at Caversham, New Zealand.

It may be worth your while familiarising yourself with Manual of Style, New Zealand English and American and British English differences for future reference. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 01:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Help with navbox on article
Navbox on User:Buggie111/List of Moscow metro stations (v2.0) was once small, off to the side, perfectly fine. Now it's messed up. I moved it to the bottom so as not to mess up the page. Any help? Buggie111 (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see any problem with it; but if it is supposed to be smaller, can you give me the link to the original template? (Assuming that there was an original template in the template namespace that was smaller and off to the side.) Cheers – Samwb123T (R)-C-E 23:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see any small version - did you only use preview and not save for the intermediate versions? - there are only 2 versions in the page history. The only error is see is no closing to the table - you need to add |} at the end.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, but I can give you the ru.wiki page, to show an idea of what I wanted. 

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Daventry Express
I moved this into "article space". Is that O.K.? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Well, now it looks good, so ya. Buggie111 (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Kostas Exarhis
My bad, you better keep an eye on me ;) J04n(talk page) 15:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Contest
In regards to your question on my talk page, I think when in doubt bring it up on the contest talk page. This first month we'll probably be making a few 'rules' up as we go so it is probably the best idea to have input from everyone that is participating. By opinion by the way is to give yourself the points. It's all in good fun and whatever keeps folks motivated enough to work on the backlog is a good think. J04n(talk page) 21:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Errrrrr
Well, I don't know about the question, but I agree with your assessment: I think candidate is a shoo-in. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I;ll remove it. I'm a bit of a beginner, so please do not consider this a disruption. Buggie111 (talk) 16:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

My apologies - it seems I didn't communicate my opinion clearly enough. I have no opinion, either way, about your question, and no intention or desire that you remove it. Nor do I think it disruptive, or anything else for that matter - my apologies for confusing you.

I do, however, have an opinion about your assessment, and my opinion is that I agree with your assessment.

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

re:Battle of the Arges
Greetings, I think that a proper name for such an article would be "Battle of the Arges". Unfortunately, the amount of reliable English sources regarding Romania in World War I is very limited so it would be almost impossible to make a broad article on this topic. Feel free to create the article, add as much info as you can, and I'll promise to look over it and try to improve its quality. Regarding your adminship offer, I wish to thank you for it but I'll be forced to decline since my wiki-time is currently very limited and I'm considering even not to candidate for another term as a WPMILHIST coordinator. Thanks and best regards, --Eurocopter (talk) 20:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

re: Your Edits to Nagato class
Your fix of that really clumsy sentence was good, but you lost some content there. That treaty prohibited the building of new battleships with one minor exception, except to replace old ones. So both the US and Japan (probably Great Britain also, but I haven't read that much about British battelships) did extensive rebuilds of most of their existing ships. I'm going to edit your edit and see what you think, but possibly not today.--Busaccsb (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

So you mean it allowed rebuilding of war losses? Haven't really read the article. Buggie111 (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

A link to the full text of the treaty can be found on the Washington Naval Treaty page. The treaty was pretty amazing. It stipulated a 5:5:3 ratio of capital ship tonnage for the US, Britain, and Japan and stipulated exactly which ships (by name) were to be kept and which were to be scrapped. Almost all capital ships under construction were to be scrapped. A couple were allowed to be completed to their original design, and a couple were allowed to be completed as carriers. Construction of only two new ships was authorized: the Britis were allowed to build two ships (the Nelson) class. These and all future capital ships were limited to 35,000 tons. All the ships to be kept were allowed to be scrapped and replaced after 20 years (and this is spelled out ship by ship). In case of accidental loss, a ship could be replaced immediately. As for modernizations, the treaty also spelled out what kinds of modernizations were allowable, and this had a tonnage limit. --Busaccsb (talk) 23:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Help with USS United States (CC-6)
helpme I was just having trouble using ref name in USS United States (CC-6), and I can't for the life of me figure it out. Please help with fixing the refs on the article and/or teaching me. Buggie111 (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a Wikipedia help page at Referencing for beginners. Blue question mark.svg If you require any further assistance, please join the editors on IRC by clicking here. Please insure you join the "#wikipedia-en-help." This is the default channel. Mike  moral  ♪♫  00:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Got it. Will get working. Thank you. Buggie111 (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
-MBK004 21:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC) Just saw it. TY. Buggie111 (talk) 21:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Your comment on BigDom's RfA
I was surprised to read In other words, your how (this editor) should look like. This reads to me as a personal attack on the editor which you named - and seems unnecessary to the RfA it was placed on.

I wouldn't object to you contacting the named editor and making a comment along those lines on their talk page, but I feel that it is inappropriate on the above RfA, and so I would like to ask that you remove that part of your support (rather than to strike it out, as then it would still be there) - I may agree with your sentiments, but BigDom's RfA is not the place to put it!

Regards, -- Phantom Steve /talk &#124;contribs \ 09:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Incidently, I know I have made a comment about another editor's neutral vote which could be seen as approaching a personal attack, but the difference is that the editor has (a) left a !vote (b) will be watching the page, and can respond. The editor you linked to in your comment has not commented on the RfA, and may not do so, so we have no way of knowing if they will see your comment and have the opportunity to respond to it if they should want to do so.
 * I thought I'd add this, as I don't want you to think that I'm being hypocritical! If the other editor had left a !vote or a comment on BigDom's RfA, I would not have contacted you. -- Phantom Steve /talk &#124;contribs \ 11:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies. I'll reqord that vote. I really did not want to make a personal attack. I just ment that he's a good role model. Buggie111 (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries! Although you might want to leave it until you see if BigDom gets adminship - then you can use him as an example! -- <font color="#307D7E">Phantom <font color="#55CAFA">Steve /<font color="#008000">talk &#124;<font color="#000080">contribs \ 16:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Re Jewel Geyser
Just fell off the map for some reason. I moved it to the article space. Thanks for the reminder.--Mike Cline (talk) 22:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Imperatritsa Mariya GAR
Hey, you got mixed up between the class article, which you claimed, and the ship article, which is the one you actually reviewed, on the WP:GAN page. You need to fix it to prevent confusion and to get your second opinion directed to the right place.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up!

Buggie111 (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, you asked for a second opinion? I've given my thoughts at Talk:Russian battleship Imperatritsa Mariya/GA1. I'll be back in a day or so, but if you want me before, feel free to leave me a note (or a talkback if you reply here). Best, <font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">HJ Mitchell | <font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts?   01:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've responded to the comments, check it out to see if you're satisfied with the revisions.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * She passed! I'll update OMT. Buggie111 (talk) 23:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

RE:Samwest
If we can get it to the point of being a viable article, I'm all for including it. As for Paris, that's somewhat peripheral to Normandy, which officially ended with the closing of the Falaise Gap on 21 August. Paris was a few days later and wasn't technically part of the Battle of Normandy in that regard. Cam (Chat) 15:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator election
for your support MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Likewise. Just a quick note to thank you for your support at the election, very much appreciated. See you around the Milhist pages! Ranger Steve (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Moscow monorail
Oh wow, I'm not sure I'm the right person for this task. I'm neither a metro enthusiast, nor an engineer, nor even really a techie, and that section uses a lot of very specialized terminology. I could certainly try and do my best, and the result will probably even make some sense in English, but if you can think of a different person to ask, I'd recommend you try them first. Please let me know what you decide. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 27, 2010; 20:31 (UTC)

Notice
Hello Buggie111. You might want to check this out: WP:AN/I#Personal attacks from User:Buggie111. Cheers, -- <font color="#3d2b1f"> Meäghân talk   23:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"warn for comments in template talk space"?
Hi, a misplaced comment at Template talk:Talkback is not vandalism,, and it certainly doesn't warrant any kind of warning,. It's a mistake. Happens a lot. Educate the editor who makes it, don't threaten them, please. Amalthea 23:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Sure. I'll try not to do so in the future. Buggie111 (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Article redirects
When you are redirecting articles, be sure to go back and blank the talk pages, and not to leave a redirect on the talk pages. Otherwise the redirects will still show up as assessed articles in the assessment categories of the wikiprojects. -MBK004 23:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Ok. Sorry. Buggie111 (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Most wikiproject banner templates allow for an "NA" class and some even a "Redirect" class, so it's not necessary to blank the talk page, and definitely not advisable if there's any existing discussion history on the talk page. -- &oelig; &trade; 09:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

You're fast!
I just felt the earthquake, and see you've already put up a stub! Wikipedia is where to go for news these days it seems ... Antandrus (talk) 23:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Yup. I got a "friendly pointer" that all the things in our house were shaking. I always wanted to be the creator of such an article. Buggie111 (talk) 23:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Ciudad Juarez GAN
Hi, I noticed you picked this article up. Just wanted to drop you a note that this is actually my first GA nom (I've worked on others but never nominated one myself) so please be patient and extra understanding.radek (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I was wondering if you've had time to do any further review of the article.radek (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Colorado State Highway 263
Hello! Your submission of Colorado State Highway 263 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Ciudad Juárez/GA1
Are you intending to carry on with this? It is marked as 2nd opinion at WP:GAN, but no review has been undertaken yet? –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Nope. I know that I shouldn't abbandon things in mid-stride, but yes. I've notified the user, so, if you want to do the review,you can do all of the aspec ts that I have not covered. See you along! Buggie111 (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, for future reference, it is best to leave a note at WT:GA or the drive talk page, if you have to abandon, but no worries, I shall review it later today. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

TB
--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 23:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Solveig's song
Hi, I saw you'd translated the Norwegian, but it looks like a machine translation? I fixed it up, but if you did get it from Google Translate or somewhere, you should know that's held to be worse than no translation, because the output never makes much sense. --Yngvadottir (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I took it for too much of a given, since the lyrics in English looked comprhensible. I'll stick to Russian and Spanish. Buggie111 (talk) 13:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
~ N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 13:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand
Hey, we hammered that article out pretty well. I saw you nominated it for DYK, do you mind if I add my name to the nomination to get credit for it too? Parsecboy (talk) 16:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC) Sure..., just found another ref, but not much to add. Buggie111 (talk) 16:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I was the one who beat you to it! I was just trying to help out :)--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 16:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand
IMHO, you should nominate it for a GA now. I've gone through it and fixed several issues that would result in a quick fail (periods and commas after the citation, inconsitencies ect..) I've even added a few citations myself and expanded the last paragraph a very little bit. I think that this article is good to go.--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 17:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I;m leaving now though, so I'll nom when I get back (5 hours) (No hijacking of it!). Buggie111 (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh Yes! (I'm just kidding, if anything I'd get .1% credit for it) Good luck and I'll try to help you out in the GAN ;)--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 17:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, you did everything without me :( I did'nt even get a chance to make any edits, now I cannot claim my 1% credit!--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 22:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

RE
--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 23:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Regina Elena
I was updating the Regina Elena infobox to include conversions and noticed that Jane's Battleships differs significantly from Conway's which is what I used. I'm going to bring this up at the OMT talk page so we can get other people to check their sources as I'm not sure that Jane's isn't just a reprint of the contemporary wartime (and unreliable) volumes of Jane's Fighting Ships. I had planned to work on this class this week as I told you when I said that I had no plans for the Franz Ferdinand. My normal policy is not to claim a ship or class until I'm ready to work on it, but you've claimed a number well in excess of your ability to work in the immediate future. Please trim back your plans to include only those ships that you can write about now. You can always reclaim them whenever you're ready to work on them if nobody else has started work. Please note that my name and Parsecboy's may be all over the page, but only on articles we've worked on or plan to shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

I know, mister 50 GA writer. I didn't really want to be "Just like the big league players", but basically just thought that getting a couple of facts into one-sentance stubs wouldn't hurt. I'll trim down a lot (heck with it, a gets me another wiki-space edit). And also, I'll try to either a.Get the Conway's book or b.) cut back on Armament citing from Janes and only use it for history (which it describes in a very short and annoying manenr). See ya, Buggie111 (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

French battleship République (1902)
do you want to help me out with this one? We can get it to a DYK then a GA in a week or so. Just be sure to allow me to add stuff in as well! I call adding in sources from teh external links that are already in the article and you can...well I'm not sure but my library on French warships is somewhat lacking so those are the only sources I've got to use while you seem to own several books on the subject. Thanks!--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 01:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Sure, but not at this exact moment. Buggie111 (talk) 02:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Oklahoma
Hey man, thanks for your additions to USS Oklahoma (BB-37)! However, could I ask you to add page numbers in place of the chapters? The "Chapter" field is meant for individual sections of books (something like the country sections in Conway's), and page numbers are required for any assessment of B or above. Thanks! :) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face"> Ed  (talk  •  majestic titan)  04:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, thanks for the pointer. Buggie111 (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and one more thing: the book's language is English, no |language= is required in the template, as it is assumed. If you want, I'd be happy to collaborate with you on this article in the summer. I did write USS Nevada (BB-36), after all... ;) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face"> Ed  (talk  •  majestic titan)  19:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * In the summer, I'll be here, my Russian hometown, with nearly no opportunity to edit. We could do so now, or in late July. Either is fine. Buggie111 (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I could start helping in roughly 1 1/2 weeks, but late July would be fine too&mdash;your call. —<font face="Baskerville Old Face"> Ed  (talk  •  majestic titan)  19:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * 1.5 weeks. Hmmm, that's about a week before my check in date for my book. So what, I'm fine with that. I can't get it right now, as I'm going to have to leave in 10 minutes. You've got too many exams to start this later today? Buggie111 (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I missed your reply. I can't start helping until roughly Wednesday or Thursday, because that's when I will be truly free and at home with my books again. —<font face="Baskerville Old Face"> Ed  (talk  •  majestic titan)  18:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok then. I'll get to work in a couple of hours removing chpater= from the refs. Buggie111 (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Request

 * Hey, do you want to help me expand the SMS Babenberg? I've already expanded the SMS Arpad and the SMS Habsburg to DYK eligibility and even GA status if I nominate them. In order to not leave you out of the action, lets work on this one so you some credit in the GTC.--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 00:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Look, first, I'm fine with Republique. I'm fine with anything. Second, I don't care if I get let out. I've had time cosntraints and so forth. But, heck with it. Let's go. Buggie111 (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Great. I'll let you make a few edits and then I'll finish it off. Then its on for three GA's!--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 00:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Your so kind, and fast. I'm going to start Virbuis Unitus later today if I have time. I hsould never have let this editor see OMT . Buggie111 (talk) 00:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I should have joined OTM months ago --<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 01:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK issue
Your DYK nom for Colorado State highway 263 still has an issue that needs to be fixed bfore we can pass it.--<font style="color:#191970">White Shadows <font style="color:#DC143C">you're breaking up 01:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Buggie111 (talk) 01:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand

 * Nice work on this article; it was a great read! — Kralizec! (talk) 14:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

GAN backlog elimination drive - 1 week to go
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

GAN backlog elimination drive - 1 week to go
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Solveig's Song
Just wanted to thank you for providing the translation. What a wonderful song! Just need to find the tune now... ;-) Thanks again. Best wishes --Haruth (talk) 10:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Umm,see the above post. I was lazy. Buggie111 (talk) 12:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * lol. At least you tried, my friend... I just passed it along... :-) Best wishes --Haruth (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Battleships portal
Please don't add hooks to existing DYK panels as you did here. There is a holding area for hooks on the talk page, and I am trying to keep the national variety throughout each panel so once enough different nationalities are available, I create another panel for the portal. To that end I try to not put a German and Austro-Hungarian hook on the same panel, as you did. -MBK004 20:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC) Ahh, I see. Well, sorry there. And thanks for mopping up after all of my mistakes. Buggie111 (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
— AustralianRupert (talk) 23:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Douglas (2002)
The article Hurricane Douglas (2002) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hurricane Douglas (2002) for things which need to be addressed. S Masters (talk) 08:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

2010 Aaron's 499
Excuse me, but I would appriciate it if you would make this article like this article (as in article format) so the article can be later nominated for GA status. Thank You. -- Nascar 1996  23:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've got work, but I'll try. Tommorow night I should be free. Buggie111 (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a good reference to go by on the article. -- Nascar 1996  00:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I found the lap by lap. I'm all in. Buggie111 (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please remove all the references exept the first and the last one. Also can you please spell Kevin Harvick right. I may have to completely redo the first ten laps to show you how I would like it to be done, but your work will be hidden if you want to change it back. I have three good article, working on my fourth, and all of them are 2010 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series races. Thanks. Sorry for this inconvienience. -- Nascar  1996  01:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've done so, but how did I misspell it? Buggie111 (talk) 02:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Harwik. I also gave you a good example to do lap 11-20. -- Nascar 1996  02:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll try and do so. Buggie111 (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I finished the Race Summary; so if you want, you can finish the Results. Thanks for trying to help with the article; it is well appriciated. Also if the article makes it to GA, you will get part of the credit. Thanks again -- Nascar 1996  00:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC).

DYK for Number 13 class battleship
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kii class battleship
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for German submarine U-450
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Douglas (2002)
The article Hurricane Douglas (2002) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Douglas (2002) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! S Masters (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elmer H. Inman
Hello! Your submission of Elmer H. Inman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PleaseStand (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ message • changes) 23:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
—<font face="Baskerville Old Face"> Ed  (talk  •  majestic titan)  02:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SMS Babenberg
Materialscientist (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SMS Árpád
Materialscientist (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SMS Prinz Eugen
Materialscientist (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for SMS Tegetthoff
Materialscientist (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The golden cue
Sorry about the confusion. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Mediterranean Division
Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your support
Thanks for your support at my RfA. I was a little surprised by the nomination, and I am unable to go through with it at this time, but I appreciate your support. Regards, P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 17:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Start class to GA
Is there some reason why you're bypassing a B-class assessment and going directly to GA? The more eyes on an article the better it will be. Especially with typos, etc. And you've missed one major sortie in the Viribis Unitis article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I"ll withdraw. What is that sortie, the sinking of the Istvan? Buggie111 (talk) 21:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's the one. I'm not saying that you should withdraw your current nominations, but I'd strongly suggest going over them again to catch the little stuff like typos, incomplete citations, etc. Don't be in such a rush to get a GA in the future; like many things articles are often better the more time that you spend with them. The extra time allows you to go through them and see what you actually wrote, versus what you meant to say.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought I mentioned that one. HWI, I'll work them over after Brazilian battleship Riachuelo. Buggie111 (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
— AustralianRupert (talk) 00:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)