User talk:Bugz97

Speedy deletion of Welcome 2 Tha Hood
A tag has been placed on Welcome 2 Tha Hood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an album which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dekisugi (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Time 2 Find Those Hoes (Nate Dogg album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Time 2 Find Those Hoes (Nate Dogg album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No sources and not obviously noteworthy at present.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 22:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Grammar
Please use correct grammar when making articles. Capitalizing the first letter of every word is not correct grammar. Chocolate Bar 15:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Again. No capitalizing every word. Okay? Chocolate Bar 23:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Time 2 Find Those Hoes (Nate Dogg album)
I have nominated Time 2 Find Those Hoes (Nate Dogg album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Time 2 Find Those Hoes (Nate Dogg album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 03:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blood Money 2 (Mobb Deep Album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blood Money 2 (Mobb Deep Album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No references, unreleased album, content is too incoherent to turn into an encyclopedic article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Havoc.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Havoc.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Swifty McVay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Swifty McVay.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Money And The Power (Nate Dogg album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Money And The Power (Nate Dogg album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Uncited future album, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diverse Mentality  21:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of three articles
I have proposed articles that you created, Welcome To The Dogg House (Nate Dogg album), The Underestimated Vol. 2 and The Infamous M.O.B.B D.E.E.P for deletion. These articles appear to be unsourced and uncorfirmed and I couldn't find any reliable sources about these "upcoming albums" by making a simple google search. No offense, but I advise you to think twice next time you're creating another article. If an article doesn't have any reliable sources, it will be deleted because for example, upcoming albums have to be verified. Karppinen (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Paul Cooke.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Cooke.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Todd Byrne.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Todd Byrne.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)