User talk:Buidhe/Archive 10

ECtHR
The section "Impact" is not balanced or neutral. You can't create a lengthy section relying on only one single source. The source used (the CoE) is also biased itself towards the court (obviously). A source being biased is not in and of itself a problem (few sources are actually neutral), but for balance other sources must be added too. 123username (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Anti-gender movement
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Why just leave empty sections?
Is that helpful somehow? Instead of having actual information? People should be forced look at another article to get information which the title of this page describes they should get?★Trekker (talk) 22:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Excerpting shows the relevant content on the page. It is not the same as a "see also" link which does force you to click on a link to see more information. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * So far I'm not able to see any text under these sections.★Trekker (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Temp test article.png is what its supposed to look like. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok. I can see it now. Sorry for the confusion on my part.★Trekker (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Progress of GAn review
Hey Buidhe, I was just curious as to when you were going to post some suggestions at Talk:Invasion of South Kasai/GA1. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Image question
As a prolific image reviewer at FAC, I figured you might have some insight. I'm wanting to take a picture of this page in this 1950 publication. Normally I'd assume this wouldn't be allowed, but as a reproduction of music I'm wondering if an exception of some kind exists? Best, Aza24 (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I really appreciate that :) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I second that what Piotrus said, you are doing a fabulous work Buidhe. - GizzyCatBella  🍁  05:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Raid on Gaborone article
You reverted the article back to it's previous, obviously politically biased state, which referred to South Africans leaving the country to escape Apartheid persecution as "terrorists". Due to your actions the article now again uses badly sourced and biased material to spin a narrative that tries to glorify and justify this act of terror against the sovereign nation of Botswana, an act of terror by the Apartheid government which prompted a swift diplomatic response by the United States, the United Kingdom, many other countries and the United Nations. Please refrain from further disruptive edits in favour of extremist narratives! HartaMarta (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Talk:List of villages and towns depopulated of Jews during the Holocaust
Hello, I’d appreciate it if you could weigh in on the question I’ve raised on this page. Many thanks. - Biruitorul Talk 22:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kosovar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Foreign funding of NGOs
—valereee (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Andrew Fraser (lawyer)
has asked for a deletion review of Andrew Fraser (lawyer). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 01:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 40, July – August 2020 
 * New partnerships
 * Al Manhal
 * Ancestry
 * RILM
 * #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
 * AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 40, July – August 2020 
 * New partnerships
 * Al Manhal
 * Ancestry
 * RILM
 * #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
 * AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Pepy I at FAC
Dear Buidhe, would you please consider doing a source review for the article Pepi I Meryre, which is currently at FAC ? The article has been posted there a while ago and as received only one text review so far, so I am worried about it failing for want of reviews, in particular image and source ones. Thank you.Iry-Hor (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I am actually backlogged at the moment, unfortunately, although it's possible I might be able to do it after clearing out what I already promised to do. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  11:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you for your response !Iry-Hor (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bartosz Staszewski
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Twilight of Democracy
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Life and Death of the Radical Historical Jesus
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Milan Mazurek
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Insulting a monument
Hi, the reviewer responded to you almost 2 weeks ago. Yoninah (talk) 12:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Jewish views on lying
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Religion and authoritarianism
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of White Genocide (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on White Genocide (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Czech Association of Freedom Fighters


Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Czech Association of Freedom Fighters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 03:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jewish Code (Slovakia)


Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jewish Code".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Polish Stonewall
The article Polish Stonewall you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Polish Stonewall for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The disambiguation bot is faulty
Hi Buidhe. I see that you are using some king of bot or code that removes wikilinks leading to disamb. pages. Please reconsider. It is allowed on Wiki to set in such links, because they do contain information (mainly by explaining the term in the lead, but not only). If your bot does automatically remove the link, it takes something away from the Wiki user, which goes against the very reason why we have Wiki. Also, some disambig. page does evolve into a proper article and then it's double right to have it linked. There is no downside, nothing to lose. I am careful about where I'm using such links, and Wiki sends me emails when I do and I go back and double-check. But even if other editors don't do that, it should be checked case by case, the criterion always being: does it clarify a term or otherwise add useful info? If it does, the link is justified and should stay on.

Concrete case: please look here, where the link leads to nahala. The linking was intentional, as that page also explains the term and doesn't just disambiguate. Hebrew is not an internationally widely used language :)))

Thank you and have a great day, Arminden (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Greek Case
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Error has no rights
Hello! Your submission of Error has no rights at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7  (discuss)  20:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jananayak Dr. Chowdari Satyanarayana (CSN) Article
Hello Sir, I hope that you would be safe and sound. My name is Mutahar Maqsood. I have uploded the biography of Dr. Chowdari Satyanarayana but it has been removed from the wikipedai and the reason which I have received for the rejection was that the information which is used with the intention of pormoting any agency or company. can you kindly explain it more details it and i will really appreciate that if let me know that still can i revive my article so that i can do the changes there. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mutahar Maqsood (talk • contribs)
 * the article was deleted by an administrator because 1) had no verifiable sources, 2) did not follow WP:NPOV policy by promoting the subject in subjective terms, rather than stating objective accomplishments of the subject. If you write an article in line with Wikipedia policies, making sure to cite all information and maintain a neutral tone, it will not be deleted. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Can you kindly Transfer it in sandbox
I have uploaded the biography of Dr. Chowdari Satyanarayana but it has been removed from Wikipedia and the reason which I have received for the rejection was that the information which is used with the intention of promoting any agency or company. can you kindly explain it more details it and i will really appreciate that if let me know that still can i revive my article so that I can do the changes there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mutahar Maqsood (talk • contribs)
 * I cannot help you as I am not an administrator. You can ask at WP:REFUND. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

GA nomination
Hello Buidhe. I’ve nominated an [article] for GA. After working with many editors and admins to get it to where it is now, I think it’s ready for the process. If time permits, with your help I would like to give it a GA stamp of approval, please. Thank you for your time, and thank you for your consideration. I look forward to any collaborative efforts and guidance.TruthGuardians (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Janáček operas
Please can you tell me where, in the short discussion at Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15, you saw consensus to redirect the template? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , In the discussion, only one person explicitly called for deletion. You did not, and in your comment, you did not state any issue that would be addressed by deleting rather than redirecting the template. My understanding was that redirecting templates is generally preferred to deletion because that causes fewer problems when viewing older revisions of pages that previously transcluded the template. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * My nomination was for deletion and, I think, clearly so. Had I meant redirection, I would have said so; or simply redirected it. There were no people explicitly calling for redirection. If anything, I think redirection will cause more, not fewer, problems on old pages. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I cannot see any actual problem here, but as you wish, I have reversed the closure. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Jeffrey Kimball (historian)
—valereee (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Revert
Thanks for that. Script error. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Rescuer (genocide), which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Decent interval
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Polish Stonewall
Hello! Your submission of Polish Stonewall at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 10:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Jewish war conspiracy theory
You have added a short reference to "Stargardt 2015" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) to highlight such errors in the future. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Internal exile in Greece
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Ooops
I didn't mean to revert all of your changes, but they came on top of edits by what seems to be a problematic WP:SPA account which I was meaning to revert, not you. I suggest discussing this on talk and being careful not to WP:DFTT (i.e. account sof likely indef banned users...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:V. Ravichandran filmography
Hello Buidhe, Greetings! If the filmography section is excluded from the article, then do you agree on moving draft to article? Because many actors of Kannada cinema, have separate article on filmography. -- Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 07:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , It would best to get consensus for this split on the talk page Talk:V. Ravichandran using the procedure in WP:SPLIT. Personally, I would advise against split because the WP:Article size is not large enough to justify it. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Buidhe, Thank you for your suggestion. My one observance is that, the filmography section is considerably large. Dosent it justify for it to be in a seperate article? -- Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 08:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , It actually isn't very long. According to the WP:Article size guideline, the article could be twice as long before the length would justify a split. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it. Thank you Buidhe. -- Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 08:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eliminationism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segregation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Buidhe
What’s the article title of that article? How do you justify this revert? Should I tell you how many times you reverted the word “prison" by now? You are such a great contributor and I like you but sometimes looks like you are having trouble to compromise. GizzyCatBella  🍁  22:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , If it is determined that this article is not covered by your t-ban I would suggest commenting on the last section on the talk page. Surely you know by now that the quality of sources is more important than quantity. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * But it was a prison, there are sources for that. Other names are also in the lead as you wanted. Why this hard stance despite at least 3 people disagreeing with you on that? This is what I’m not getting Buidhe. - GizzyCatBella  🍁  22:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , A prison is where people are held according to the law. This place was not a prison, because the people were not detained according to laws, but according to the whims of the authorities. That is the definition of internment/concentration camp. So far no one has addressed this distinction. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, Buidhe, you know my position on this one, and I hope you will respect it. I'll let you sort this with Piotrus then, but remember what my view is, please -  GizzyCatBella  🍁  22:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Necessary in a democratic society
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Review for Draft:List of programs broadcast by Heart of Asia (TV channel)
Hello Buidhe! I have added more references where the programs are being broadcast from GMA's digital channel Heart of Asia. Can you review my draft that I've edited recently? Would be appreciated if it can be moved back to being an regular article. Thanks! David Isaac C. M. (talk) 00:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Max Nather concerns
Hello,

I inherited http://wwi-cookup.com/ from a prior editor. I backed it up with another cite as can be seen. Should have deleted it at that time. Thanks for the heads up.

The Aerodrome has a bibliography, which by consensus makes a website reliable. We in the WWI aviation history community established that some years ago in a consensus. Also, some of the world's most published and greatest authorities on WWI aviation are behind the site--Greg VanWyngarden, for instance. These are the same historians that we cite when they publish in print. It makes no sense to say they are reliable in print, but not on the internet. Kinda reminiscent of the argument that paper encyclopedias are better than Wikipedia.

Now, off to zap http://wwi-cookup.com/.Georgejdorner (talk) 04:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Er, paper encyclopedias are often reliable sources according to WP:RS; whereas, Wikipedia is never considered a reliable source (WP:CIRCULAR). I will post this to WP:RSN for feedback from uninvolved editors. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I realize that, in my haste, I have been ambiguous. I am not plumping for WP as a self-referential source. And I realize that WP has to legally cover its butt by insisting that, overall, changes will happen. However, the concept that only print sources are grist for an internet encyclopedia goes against the flow of events. MSM is fading as Internet news picks up. Information storage is rising into the Cloud. WP is pretty unchanging except for growth; not much deletion going on.
 * The Aerodrome website has a bibliography page buried deep within. Pain in the tail to find. Some biography pages in the site cite the source(s) at the foot--where the historians cite the very books I use when I can find them.
 * Aerodrome forum as source is forbidden, of course.Georgejdorner (talk) 04:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Distinctive unit insignia concerns
Hi Buidhe, I noticed that your bot edited a portion of the U.S. Army Distinctive unit insignia page. Just a slight heads up that we keep the unit mottos on the insignia as unlinked as often they can get linked to a completely different meaning than what is actually meant by the U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry. The meaning of the mottos on the DUI's gets explained in the units page generally under the Crest sections and comes directly from the TIOH. Rukia8492 (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Greece in the Council of Europe
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Question?
When a specific newspaper edition is used as a source, what should the sourcing details include?

Regards - Pendright (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Usually, the publication date, headline, and name of the newspaper at a minimum. See cite news (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you - Pendright (talk) 18:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nástup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nástup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nástup
The article Nástup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nástup for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Error has no rights
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Failed assassination attempts
Hello, Buidhe,

Why are you moving so many articles out of this category? They've been added to this category over the years and doing an mass emptying is not appropriate. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , I moved them to Category:Failed assassination attempts in Europe. There is no mass emptying (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:WekaFS
Hello Buidhe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:WekaFS, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Need Your help in Begin Sadat Center for strategic studies
I believe that there is a user with multiple fake accounts is trying to vandalize the article and turning it into promotional campiagn instead of encyclopdic work, he is deleting third party sources then added tons of primary sources , then engage din edtiing warring they/he needs to be blocked or something , or You can secure the article maybe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begin%E2%80%93Sadat_Center_for_Strategic_Studies. Thank You AleviQizilbash (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Paradise Chronicle and User User:AppleBsTime turned out to be planning a conspiracy against me on Begin Sadat Center article, they pre planned an escalated dispute to grant me a block , here is the evidence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paradise_Chronicle#Sheikh_Adi_Ibn_Musafir_was_a_Muslim and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wbiases , I believe that they need to be blocked and banned for life along with their IP ranges over their hateful and abusive behavior , Thank You AleviQizilbash (talk) 18:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * We probably have a textbook case of BOOMERANG about to unveil itself. - AppleBsTime (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Die BIF/GA1
Buidhe, you are still listed as the reviewer of this GA nomination, yet you have not been responding to pings. If you are no longer interested in pursuing this review, please let me know and I'll look for another reviewer. If you are, please post in response to the recent comments there. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Thanks
I don't think I've done a GAR before, and I guess I didn't read the instructions closely enough. Thanks for fixing it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Swapping pages with talk pages
Looks like you got hit by the same pageswap bug that I've seen a few other times lately: if you do a pageswap of two pages where one has a talk page and the other doesn't, the redirect from moving the talk page will be improperly suppressed. I just created two missing redirects at Talk:September 1859 geomagnetic storm and Talk:September 1859 geomagnetic storm/Archive 1. Please keep this in mind for future pageswaps. Jackmcbarn (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 15:57:43, 4 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Holcman1
Dear wiki controller,

Could you give me access to my page.

Single_particle_trajectories

The statement of copyright mentioned in your email is non-sense,

1-as I am the corresponding author and own the rights of my papers that you are quoting. Iam OK to give right to wikipedia. 2-I wrote the article by making substancial changes compared to the exiting review. I am not sure how this decision was made.

Thus I reject the statement of the email below. Best, David.

Holcman1 (talk) 15:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hello, thanks for your contributions! Unfortunately, we have to confirm that you have the rights to the content in question. The easiest way to donate your text so that it can be used on Wikipedia is to add somewhere on the website a "The text of this paper is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License." (This is the same free license that Wikipedia uses.)
 * If that is not possible, there are other ways to do it; see WP:DONATETEXT.
 * Once we have established that you have the rights to the text, please let me know and I will ask an administrator to undelete the page. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Once we have established that you have the rights to the text, please let me know and I will ask an administrator to undelete the page. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Once we have established that you have the rights to the text, please let me know and I will ask an administrator to undelete the page. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pelagianism
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pelagianism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding this article submission.
Hello. I probably should have clarified it somewhere, but the purpose of this submission is actually to allow us to move the corresponding section to a separate article, since it's already too long and its disproportionate length hinders addition of new material. So, should I resubmit it? -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Ah, I see. I hadn't checked the size of the other article. I've now passed it. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  11:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * All right, thank you. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Moved to draft
Your name appears in the page history of an article I created, stating you added the AfC box. The article has been moved to the Draft space; something that I have never heard of before, even though I have created 237 pages in Wikipedia. I did find, on the Wikipedia AfC page this sentence "The Articles for Creation (AfC) process is intended to assist editors who cannot (e.g. non-registered or non-autoconfirmed users)... create new articles directly into mainspace." But I am far from "non-regitered" and far from "non-autoconfirmed". I made my first edit in 2006 and I have 9,165 live edits. I have had the same user-name the entire time, and I was logged-in when I created the moved article. I am, to say the least, deeply puzzled as to why it was moved to Drafts. Since your name appears in the history, I hope you can explain why it was moved. I am assuming good faith, but believe some error was made. Nick Beeson (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

RM closure
Good morning, you closed this RM discussion upon a nomination by User:Johnbod very quickly, after only one oppose by User:Place Clichy. Could you please reopen the discussion in order to allow some more reactions? Marcocapelle (talk) 09:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Sure. I have been told by other experts that relisting RMs in general is discouraged. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I am also not too sure if relisting helps to get more reactions, but leaving a discussion open for a longer period because of too few initial reactions certainly doesn't harm. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Víctor Pérez (footballer)
When you moved this page you did not move across the talk page... GiantSnowman 10:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , In fact I did, please see the history of Talk:Víctor Pérez (footballer). (t &#183; c)  buidhe  10:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * no, because Talk:Víctor Pérez Alonso is a standalone talk page, given that Víctor Pérez Alonso redirects to Víctor Pérez (footballer)....so Talk:Víctor Pérez Alonso should be a redirect to Talk:Víctor Pérez (footballer) and not standalone. GiantSnowman 11:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Eric talk 11:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Extended confirmed user - can I start articles direct?
Hello:

You recently contacted me about my translation from the German Wiki on Martin Dibobe. This now appears in the English Wiki and I am pleased about that. I believe that I am now an 'Extended Confirmed User'.

I have new article, this time from the Italian Wiki but with a lot of new information, all of which is cited. It is still in draft form and I will finish it within a day or two.

My question is this: will it have to stay in Draft form until I have submitted it for approval? Or can I just go ahead and put it up onto the English Wiki off my own bat, given that I am an 'Extended Confirmed User'?

Thanks for your advice and help.

--Mikeo1938 (talk) 13:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , the Articles for Creation process is not mandatory. Once you are autoconfirmed you can move drafts to mainspace or start articles in mainspace. See Help:How to move a page for guidance. Thanks for your contributions! (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry - I posted twice! --Mikeo1938 (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Buidhe, for your prompt reply and the info. I will go ahead along those lines. --Mikeo1938 (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

2021 MLB Season

 * Hello. I was just wondering how the 2021 MLB season page can become active and not a draft.  There has been three managerial changes that are on the list now.  Thank you.  posty (talk) 17:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Ronald A. Weinberg
 Reply - Why was Talk:Ronald A. Weinberg only closed after one relist? --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I have been told by knowledgeable editors that it is discouraged to relist move requests more than once. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 *  Reply - "If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me (Jax 0677), so I will be notified". --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Non-admin closure of move request at Exo
Hi, Buidhe. Would you revert your closure of the move request at Talk:Exo (group). Closes of "no consensus" should be done by admins (WP:NACPIT, just an essay). Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As you stated, it's just an essay. Is there an actual problem with the close? (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The Greek Case
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Greek Case has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the article moving forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks so much for the copyedit! it was very helpful for improving the article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Adam Puławski
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)