User talk:Buidhe/Archive 26

Keerbergs Transport Racing draftification
Why did you moved the article into draftspace? Formula Downforce (talk) 14:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Per WP:NORG, there needs to be significant coverage of the team in independent sources for it to be notable. For example, in depth news reporting on the team. If you make sure to cite significant coverage whenever you create a new article, it won't be draftified. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  17:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Grupo Herdez. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Buidhe,
 * If you disagree with an article being moved to Draft space, please move it back, do not cut & paste content into a new main space article. Now we have a main space page and a Draft on the same subject with different page histories. It's fine to object to draftification, but please keep the page history in tact. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * if you look at both articles you can see that no content was copied via cut and paste move. The article at Grupo Herdez was written from scratch. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Reverts
Please do not revert everything if you’re just editing. E.g., if you are changing a redirect to a full article, you just change it. You don’t revert and then make the new article. Reverting implies that there was a bad edit, which in the case of these crawdads, was not. You are just expanding to a full article. awkwafaba (📥) 11:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * ?? (t &#183; c)  buidhe  16:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

copyright problem
Can you solve this problem? Thanks.  –MinisterOfReligion  (Talk) 07:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello , Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to ), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also. Software news: and  have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved. Suggestions:
 * There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
 * Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
 * Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
 * This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog: Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

first homosexual movement
buidhe, i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. was the scientific-humanitarian committee "the world's first LGBT organization", as asserted in the blurb, or "the first LGBT rights organization in history", as asserted in the article on the committee? this statement in the blurb deals with a superlative, so i wanted to make sure it was correct. i am admittedly also wary of using the wording "the world's first homosexual organization", as seen in the article lead, to describe the committee, since groups such as the sacred band of thebes could be thought to have been established earlier, under a reasonable interpretation of the phrase.also, after i noticed that there seemed to be some confusion during the drafting of the blurb, i thought you might like to know that, when determining the length of a blurb, the link to the featured article at the end of a blurb is generally included in the character count, as was explained to me. (there is a space after the last parenthesis, but i usually do not include that in the count.) the blurb's length is fine now, but this is just for future reference. hope this helps! dying (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I will take a look later today. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this to WP:ERRORS ... I'm fine with your suggestions, but I'd prefer to let someone else make the edit here ... ERRORS is watched by a lot of people ... probably someone will make the edit and probably you'll be happy with it ... but I'll keep an eye on it, and if nothing happens before it goes live, I'll make the edit. You might want to respond at ERRORS to let folks know whether you're happy with FFF's suggestion. - Dank (push to talk) 19:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you today for the article, introduced (and I smiled): "This article is marginally less depressing than the stuff that you guys usually get from me." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ... and today, thank you for Sayfo, "about the lesser known sibling of the Armenian genocide." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the image review of Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Politics of resentment


The article Politics of resentment has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lacks any real merit"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Backlog drive - issues and options
After the backlog was momentarily brought down to 0, participants are having a tough time getting pages to review. This has possibly led to a lot of unnecessarily quick rejections or draftifications, as can be evidenced by the thread on the main NPP discussion page. Some options: I think we should do option 1. It is the simplest. Thoughts? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Close the backlog drive early, say on 24th. We could say 15th-24th (10 days) is considered as the 3rd week. This is unprecedented, but the backlog hitting 0 has also never happened before.
 * 2) Change the consideration for streak awards for the last week: Whatever level of streak they got for the last week will be considered as one level higher than normal. So if a person's weekly score was 110, 115, 105 and 75, then they still get the streak award for above 100. This will not affect the total score and the award tiers there. This is somewhat complicated, but i'm willing to do the calculations necessary, after the drive.
 * 3) Do nothing i.e. leave the rules as is and let the drive continue till the 31st.


 * I would support 1 as well. Call it a success! (t &#183; c)  buidhe  02:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Total success! So successful that we are having problems. Could you do the announcement on the drive talk page please? I'll do a followup after I talk to Tol. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Buidhe@MPGuy2824. What we could do is run the drive but just limit the streak awards to weeks 1-3 and therefore doing nothing in week 4 isn’t going to impact your streak. I’m open to 1 as well. Zippybonzo &#124; Talk (he&#124;him) 07:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pull-up (exercise)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pull-up (exercise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Early end of the backlog drive
A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.

Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.

Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Just FYI
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/14/more-than-half-of-countries-are-democratic/ Moxy - 23:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Featured_picture_candidates/Geraldine_Ulmar_as_Yum-Yum
Could you clarify if, like me, you support both, but prefer the original, or would only like to see the original promoted? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 21:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Empire of the People
Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Empire of the People, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your opinion, if you have a moment?
I noticed a recent clean-up you did, so thought you might be willing to advise or intervene? An IP [who appears to have extensive WP experience] has recently been editing European integration, especially European integration. My attempt to engage at talk:European integration has been rebuffed, with even an NPA allegation at my talk page to boot. Clearly I'm not going to go to ANI with a content dispute but I have no idea how to negotiate with a blank wall. Any advice?

No worries if you decline, I'm sure you have more productive things to do with your time. I can try the Teahouse instead. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus
Pinging you since you did comment on the second FAC, in case you have suggestions for resolving the issues noted there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Empire of the People


Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Empire of the People".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Stan Oklobdzija
Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stan Oklobdzija, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia barnstars for you
Thanks werldwayd (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions review: proposed decision and community review
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process. The Proposed Decision phase of the discretionary sanctions review process has now opened. A five-day public review period for the proposed decision, before arbitrators cast votes on the proposed decision, is open through November 18. Any interested editors are invited to comment on the proposed decision talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Pull-up (exercise)
Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2022 British Medical Association industrial action
Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 British Medical Association industrial action, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer
If you are still looking for candidates for new page reviewers, I have just put in my request along with reasons why I should. Thank you in advance if I am able to have a chance with this wonderful opportunity.

Karaokelegend (talk) 02:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pull-up (exercise)
The article Pull-up (exercise) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pull-up (exercise) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pull-up (exercise)
The article Pull-up (exercise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pull-up (exercise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 53
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 53, September – October 2022 
 * New collections:
 * Edward Elgar
 * E-Yearbook
 * Corriere della Serra
 * Wikilala
 * Collections moved to Library Bundle:
 * Ancestry
 * New feature: Outage notification
 * Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Weimar decadence theory
Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weimar decadence theory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Slovak Republic (1939–1945)
Hello, Buidhe.

I noticed you reverted my edit at Slovak Republic (1939–1945). When changing that heading, I considered changing the one about the Slovak-Soviet interactions, but decided against it, partly because they were more a rear-guard force behind the Germans. This heading conflicting with the target of the Template:Main beneath it is more serious than conflicting with the other heading.

What do you think? Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 02:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Personally I do not think that "Slovak invasion of Poland" or "Slovak invasion of the Soviet Union" is the right terminology at all, given that this terminology basically does not occur in reliable sources and the Slovak party was pretty insignificant to both conflicts. However, I do think it should be consistent within the article. It is not required for a section heading to be the same title as another Wikipedia article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

GOOD JOB deleting the quotations in the 1st move advantage chess wikipedia page.
What's your opinion on the quotations in the 9LX wiki page please?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fischer_random_chess#Quote_farm_once_again,_with_feeling Thewriter006 (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Referring a feedback request for History Good Article nomination to you
Hi Buidhe! As a Feedback Request Service subscriber, I received a request for feedback on an ethnic cleansing article, & I thought I would let you know, since you have edited extensively in this area.

Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Massacres of Azerbaijanis in Armenia in 1917–1921&#32; on a "History" Good Article nomination. Peaceray (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Frederick the Great
You may be interested to know that I have added some notes to the article on the sexuality of Frederick the Great. Kunst-Theodor (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2022 British Medical Association industrial action


Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 British Medical Association industrial action".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 09:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Fatma Müge Göçek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatma Müge Göçek, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Fatma Müge Göçek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Qudshanis
Hello. I noticed you renamed Qudshanis last year[1 ] but now that articles have been created for most of the villages in the province, we're in a situation that the title of this article is the odd one out (as you can see here Category:Villages in Hakkâri Province. I see the issue if Qudshanis is more common, but I wanted to ask if you would be opposed to a name change to ' Konak, Hakkâri' for harmozation reasons? Semsûrî (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I believe that Konak currently has a population about 30. When I renamed it, I could not find evidence that it's even notable in its current form, since all in-depth sources addressed the Assyrian history of the location. Instead of renaming, if both are notable it may make more sense to split. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  19:43, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There's not much post-genocide info on the village other than the residing Kurdish tribe and attempts to restore the church. But national and local media tend to use the name Konak with one of the many renditions of the historical name in parenthesislike here. All of these renditions of the historical name (Koçanis, Koçannes, Qudshanis, Koçanız etc) are not helpful either and I wonder if the article can be found by people that are interested in the topic having it titled 'Qudshanis' if they search with a different spelling. Konak could be helpful here as news outlets frequently use it. Semsûrî (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Ethnic cleansing
Hello, first of all I apologize for my previous undue information input. I re-entered information on the subject, but in a different form, I hope it's okay now. --LukeWiller (talk) 19:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC).

Contentious topics procedure adopted
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process.

The Arbitration Committee has concluded the 2021-22 review of the contentious topics system (formerly known as discretionary sanctions), and its final decision is viewable at the revision process page. As part of the review process, the Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

This motion initiates a one-month implementation period for the updates to the contentious topics system. The Arbitration Committee will announce when the initial implementation of the Committee's decision has concluded and the amendments made by the drafting arbitrators in accordance with the Committee's decision take effect. Any editors interested in the implementation process are invited to assist at the implementation talk page, and editors interested in updates may subscribe to the update list.

For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Discuss this at: 

Your draft article, Draft:Weimar decadence theory


Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weimar decadence theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Anton Schmid article
The article doesn't name Schmid, but multiple articles online explicitly state that this was a blanket measure. I see no reason to believe that it would not automatically apply to Schmid, given that this measure was blanket. Lightiggy (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Trial records for the case do not survive, making it difficult to know how Schmid may have been affected by the general amnesty. Furthermore, saying that he was pardoned without a source that directly states it is still original research since this fact is not stated in the cited source. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that’s fair Lightiggy (talk) 05:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

GAR mentor
Hi! If you have some free time, would you be willing to be my GA review mentor? I plan to review the iMac G3 nomination, which would be my first review. The criteria seem straightforward enough; I'd just like someone to make sure I'm not making any obvious mistakes. Have a nice day! DFlhb (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not sure I will have enough time to help, and technology is not the area I usually edit in. So, for best results you might ask another editor. Still, if you finish the review and would like me to look it over, I think I could do that. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:14, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks; how about I let you know when I feel the article is GA-ready, before I actually pass it, that way you can skim through it and see if anything stands out as wrong? I checking all claims are verified by the citations, and will follow the criteria methodically, so please don't feel any need to do these checks yourself; I just asked out of an abundance of caution, to be fair to the nominator, given my inexperience. DFlhb (talk) 12:39, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I've just now finished the review, would appreciate a quick look-over. If you're busy these days (understandably!) I can ask another mentor, just let me know. Thanks! DFlhb (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 27, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 27, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Looking forward to that! - In the context: Draft:Bund für Menschenrecht was deleted as the work of a now banned user, then restored as draft, - it needs editors in good standing to confirm that the context has value. You know the topic best, - could you please check it out? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Dear Buidhe, Thank you very much for all your contributions to our encyclopaedia, including your support in reviewing some of the articles I created. I send my very best wishes to you and yours for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year in 2023, in good health, joyful spirits, and a sense of achievement in all that you do, here in Wikipedia and in real life. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 12:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Buidhe : Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --A.S. Brown (talk) 04:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--176.219.153.254 (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Herman Bernstein 1915 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette piece about Russian persecution of the Jews
Happy New Year Buidhe! By serendipity, I came across this full page (broadsheet) article / editorial by Herman Bernstein & thought of your work on genocide articles. I thought you might know the appropriate article(s) in which to cite it. I do not know if you already have access to newspapers.com, but if not, you can request it at https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/. Even if you do not have access to newspapers.com yet, you should be able to view the URL as it is a "clipping" that I made. Peaceray (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

New Year's Wishes!
 Happy New Year, Buidhe! Thank you for your vital work at FAC this year, which contributes to furthering Wikipedia's reputation as a well-written and trustworthy encyclopaedia. Phenomenal work on torture as well, and thanks for organising the (albeit somewhat flawed) NPP backlog drive in July! Additionally, thanks for peer reviewing my first (thus far only) FA at the start of this year. I really appreciate all the work you do for this project and for helping me out. Yours truly,  𓃦 LunaEatsTuna  (💬) 00:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC) (It is now New Year's Day in UTC)

Happy New Year, Buidhe!


Happy New Year! Buidhe, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello , The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
 * Backlog
 * 2022 Awards

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from  to  '''

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as and  have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Third opinions
I was wondering if you had general advice? Pinging people who weren't previously involved probably isn't the best idea going forward but I also don't want to create unnessecary RFCs. Also maybe I should just wait a bit more in general since this ended up working out? I guess, basically, what is your general advice for resolving content disputes? I really do appreciate your opinions. Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 07:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't feel that I'm the right person to ask about this. Resolving content disputes has never been my focus. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * That's alright. Is there someone you would suggest I ask advice for instead? It's okay if you don't have any ideas for that either. I'm sure I'll eventually figure something out. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 07:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, maybe Vanamonde. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Shiotani
The matter of Shiotani's birth date took me ages to document -- which was particularly irritating, because I can't see how anyone's opinion of him or his work would change on learning that he was born two full months earlier or later than is commonly stated, let alone two measly days. Thank you again for prodding me, indirectly, to look at the teiko.jp page again, which led to my conclusion that the great day really, really was the 24th. Elimination of this tiny mystery has so cheered me that I have informed the Wikipedia-reading masses when to celebrate what I hereby name "Shiotani Day". (I don't remember ever having previously added a birthday to one of those pages.) As for your other proddings, the prospect of attending to them all makes me miserable. Which just means that it's time for me to stop whining and instead HTFU! -- Hoary (talk) 08:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SC DHfK Leipzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diving.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Contentious topics procedure now in effect
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's contentious topics procedure revision process.

In December, the Arbitration Committee adopted the contentious topics procedure, which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. The drafting arbitrators warmly thank all those who have worked to implement the new procedure during this implementation period and beyond. KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 19:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * For a detailed summary of the changes from the discretionary sanctions system, see WP:DSVSCT.
 * A brief guide for administrators may be found at Contentious topics/Administrator instructions.
 * Updated templates may be found at Template:Contentious topics.
 * Suggestions and concerns may be directed to the arbitration clerk team at WT:AC/C.
 * Discuss this at: 

Concern regarding Draft:Forced anal examinations
Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Forced anal examinations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 54, November – December 2022 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
 * New collections:
 * British Newspaper Archive
 * Findmypast
 * University of Michigan Press
 * ACLS
 * Duke University Press
 * 1Lib1Ref 2023
 * Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Buidhe!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Buidhe, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 03:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 03:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany, introduced "I found this article in terrible shape last December and decided to rewrite it based on recent research."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Seconding this! What an excellent and serious contribution! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 11:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with these policies
Hello Buidhe, please familiarize yourself with these policies: WP:3RR, which you have broken today, and WP:OWN, which you seem unaware of. Good day! Str1977 (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

The Holocaust in Greece
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 15 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to write the draft blurb, at Today's featured article/March 2023, to amend it once written, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for 1995 Quebec referendum
1995 Quebec referendum has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I closed the individual GAR as "Keep - no consensus" and set this a community review page. As a participant in the previous discussion, you are invited to comment on the community review page. Z1720 (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration case notification
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, GeneralNotability (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

A new article
Glaukopis - fyi :-) TrangaBellam (talk) 18:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, Wojciech Muszyński is under construction ... TrangaBellam (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)