User talk:Buidhe/Archives/ 1

Your GA nomination of Theresienstadt concentration camp
The article Theresienstadt concentration camp you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theresienstadt concentration camp for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ivanhorod Einsatzgruppen photograph
The article Ivanhorod Einsatzgruppen photograph you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ivanhorod Einsatzgruppen photograph for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Renata3 -- Renata3 (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review. I really appreciate it. Catrìona (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Move review: Paradisus Judaeorum
(sent out exact copy to all AfD participants - apologize if you are aware) Articles for deletion/Heaven for the nobles, Purgatory for the townspeople, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews which you were involved in is in discussion at Move review/Log/2018 December. Input there is welcome.Icewhiz (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Take part in a survey
Hi Catrìona

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Review of 1745 Rising
Can you have a look and let me know if you have Comments on the changes made following your review. Thanks! Robinvp11 (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Wikipedia coverage of firearms
Hello, Catrìona,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Wikipedia coverage of firearms should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Wikipedia coverage of firearms.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 12:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I raised concerns on the (now-deleted talk page) about mentioning and wikilinking users by name, but I don't think Catrìona intended it as an attack page in any way. --Pudeo (talk) 00:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Do you know how to do that star thing?
I've never given an editor a star and don't know how the system works but I wanted to give you props for your edit here.[] Thank you, Springee (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

BTW, your comments are a reminder to myself and others why AGF is so important. As one who was involved it's easy to assume POV push etc in such articles and reply with low level or even open hostility. Your responses to comments etc makes it clear that we don't always have the same base information and thus we shouldn't assume the other editor is pushing vs just writing what seems apparent to them. I'm saying this because I initially read your work with a cynical eye. I'm happy to see my cynicism was unfounded. Springee (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Catrìona, your work with this article has been diligent and gracious. Mountains of respect. All the best, Clayoquot (talk &#124; contribs) 20:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Daddy's Roommate
Thanks for taking a look at the article! I'll try and get this fixed up - this will make for an excellent WikiCup project! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy "whatever floats your boat"!
G'day Catrìona, just wanted to wish you happy Xmas and New Year, or whatever other holiday floats your boat. You have been a revelation this year in the Milhist space, and I have greatly appreciated your work on Holocaust-related articles. Have a good one! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!
I agree, keep up the good work and congrats on your nom as to: "Military history newcomer of the year for 2018". Kierzek (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

draft:Warina Hussain
Thanks for reviewing the page, I will work more for that, however one more draft draft:Areeba Habib is my submission. Will you please check is this draft is ok or not. Geo To Aisay (talk) 17:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It seems like Habib is independently notable from the show. However, currently I can't promote the draft because it would overwrite a redirect to the show. I've nominated the redirect for deletion, and if it gets deleted I will promote the draft. Thanks for your contributions! Catrìona (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Allright, Thank You. I will wait till then. Geo To Aisay (talk) 18:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Slovak, cast off your parasite
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Slovak, cast off your parasite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Slovak, cast off your parasite
The article Slovak, cast off your parasite you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Slovak, cast off your parasite for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jozef Tiso's speech in Holič
The article Jozef Tiso's speech in Holič you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jozef Tiso's speech in Holič for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank You
Catriona}}Thank you for moving the article.One favor could you change the name from John Ferrar (settler) to John Ferrar Deputy Governor (VVirginia Company) he was never a settler,hs visited Virginia but never stayed and he died in London. He was appointed Deputy Governor and Deputy Treasurer, Old article was named John Ferrar, Deputy Treasurer (Virginia Company)Isthat OK?[[User:Oldperson|Oldperson (talk) 21:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Many Thanks
Many thanks and a great redo on John Ferrar. Much cleaner. Would it be inappropriate to make a mention in the first heading along the lines of Not to be confused with John Ferrar the elder of Lonson, Esquire father of {{William Farrar(settler|Councillor William Farrar]].

There is a reason for that. A major error was made in the 18th Century by erstwhile genealogists who thought that William the Settler was a brother of Nicholas Ferrar the elder, father of {{Nicholas Ferrar]] because of the existence of a letter in the Records of the Virginia Company, #696 which is not linkable. This William, an attorney, set sail from London to Virginia on a information gathering mission and never returned. It is not known if he died on the way to or from Virginia. This has resulted in unfortunate circumstances like a "cousin" naming his son Nicholas. And to this day, that belief is scattered all over the internet, even though the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, amongst others, have since corrected the idea (originally perpetrated nationally by the same). I know the purpose of WP is not to set the record straight, But a one line sentence might helpful to others seeking information, which is what WP is regularly and routinely used for. What do you think?Oldperson (talk) 22:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * {{ping|Oldperson}} It depends on whether the other person is notable. If they're not notable, there shouldn't be a hatnote. If they are notable, then the hatnote is usually only helpful if the other article exists. Catrìona (talk) 22:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * That's right. I forgot all about that. I tried to put a hatnote on the John Ferrar page but there is something wrong with my syntaxOldperson (talk) 23:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Topoľčany pogrom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Topoľčany pogrom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Cardano pre review
, Thank you for your review. I took your advice on refbombing and deleted and reorded the references. Is this ok for now? Please reply on this Cardano talk page so everybody can see. Best regards, --FlippyFlink (talk) 09:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know enough about cryptocurrency to assess notability; I was just noting a common mistake that makes it very difficult to review AfC submissions. I suggest you put it back in the reviewing queue, so that a more knowledgeable editor can assess notability. Catrìona (talk) 17:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Catrìona, no problem. Thnx for the quick reply. --FlippyFlink (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stefan Baretzki
The article Stefan Baretzki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stefan Baretzki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 17:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Slovak Jewish Center retraining course (1941).jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Deportation of Jews from Slovakia to Auschwitz, 1942.jpeg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Shoah, Claude Lanzmann
Howdy. If you haven't already watched it, Claude Lanzmann's 1985 film Shoah and the accompanying book (Shoah: An Oral History) would probably be useful to you. The film deals chiefly with the Shoah in Poland and has interviews of victims, perpetrators and eyewitnesses. Rudolf Vrba mentions Freddy Hirsch by name no less than eight times. The film is around 9.5 hours in length, though, so you'll have to clear some time on your calendar to watch it all. Here are "Eras" One and Two on YouTube. Best wishes and continued fortune. – ♠Vami _IV†♠  14:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Tks for the recommendation. I have never seen it, but maybe I should. So many things, so little time... Catrìona (talk) 07:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Gennaro Brooks-Church
Thank you for your assistance with this submission. We feared there was another attempt at publishing an article about Mr. Brroks-Church, but I gather there is not based on your comments. I have many more sources and notoriety for the subject and will bolster soon. THanks again and nice to work with you! Jay Bestille (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Telegram notifying Litzmannstadt Gestapo of Siegfried Lederer's escape.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

2018 Military History Newcomer of the Year

 * Congratulations - well deserved! Chetsford (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Question
Is User:Catrìona the same as User:Buidhe? Because I just gave you both credit on Template:Did you know nominations/Slovak, cast off your parasite!. Yoninah (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I changed my username because it was getting annoying that others were pinging Catriona by accident. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 23:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that was a good idea. I'll adjust the DYK credits. Best, Yoninah (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Request on 01:04:15, 4 January 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by ControlSee
Hi, I see that you have not accepted my article on All These Creatures, citing that the references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. However this submission includes the same and more references of the previous Palme d'Or winning films of previous years. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Gentle_Night

Can you please tell me why this article is deemed not worthy of wikipedia and previous Cannes short film winners are? Especially as this article contains the same references they do?

Thanks

ControlSee (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Other stuff exists is not considered a good argument for notability. The problem is that you have not given references for this film that are a) independent, b) reliable, and c) have significant coverage of the subject. The best place to look is for reviews in independent publications. If these don't exist, the film is not notable. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 01:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nakam
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nakam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

2018 Year in Review

 * Thank you! bui<b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 21:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nakam
The article Nakam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nakam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 00:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Madueke
It appears that you and I both reviewed the resubmission on Mark Okoye and rejected the submission at the same time and reported the sockpuppetry at the same time. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Name change
Hi Bhuide

Happy New Year. I was looking at the review of MX's GAN and thinking that this Bhuide editor is a cheeky monkey - they seem to be taking claim for some of Catrìona's articles. All is revealed. Would that be Scots Gaelic? As in Beinn Bhuide and Meall Buidhe? Gog the Mild (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes, and yes (although Catrìona is also a Gaelic name). I changed my username because people were pinging User:Catriona by accident. "Buidhe" is Scottish Gaelic for "yellow", so it shows up in place names, either Buidhe or Bhuidhe depending on whether the previous word is masculine or feminine. It also has an association with luck, and who doesn't need more of that? Anyway—have a great 2019. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 04:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Good. Nice choice. (I have fond memories of both of my trips up Meall Bhuidhe; and more mixed ones about Beinn Bhuidhe, where it all got a bit "interesting".) I didn't realise that it was associated with luck; and had never understood why there is sometimes an h and sometimes not; my lesson for today. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Tá sí an buíocán uibhe anois :)   ——  SerialNumber  54129  15:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Abair smuain neònach a tha sin... <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 20:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Miloslavov tent camp.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Oswald Boelcke RFC
Hello,

I have posted a Request For Comment concerning our debate about Boelcke's legacy. It may be reached at Talk:Oswald Boelcke. You are welcome to submit any further comment on this matter.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Jews hiding in the Carpathians during the Slovak National Uprising.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jews hiding in the Carpathians during the Slovak National Uprising.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

File mover granted
Hello Buidhe. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ABuidhe granted] the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Enclave law
Buidhe, I was wondering whether you would be willing to return to your review here, even though it's been several months. The article was renamed in the interim, and new hooks proposed to reflect the new name. Mifter, who had reviewed in the interim, has not returned after the previous ping (and has yet to edit this year). Thanks, and Happy New Year. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Request for deletion
Hello, thank for you reviewing Draft:Aquaman (soundtrack). Could you delete the page if possible? Someone has already created the article at Aquaman (soundtrack). I just feel it ain't right being there and not deleted, thanks and apologies. Nwyde (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not an administrator, so I can't delete the article, but I did request its deletion. In the future, you can request deletion of your own articles using speedy deletion—articles can be speedily deleted by author request. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 23:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, Thanks a lot! Nwyde (talk) 01:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

✅! – Athaenara  ✉  03:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karl Plagge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karl Plagge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Laragh McCann
I realized quickly after starting the draft that she wouldn’t meet GNG but didn’t want to just abandon it like that. But she does meet NMODEL, and lately around here “some” people seem with dogged stubbornness seem to believe, especially over at the current AfD that I nominated for Kätlin Aas who has absolutely no independent reliable sources, no significant coverage, and not even routine coverage, that if a model meets NMODEL then she doesn’t have to meet GNG. So, given the circumstances, what should I do? An RfC? Trillfendi (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Trillfendi Hmm. I always thought that GNG outweighed the subject specific guidelines. However, if NMODEL is too loose and letting cases like this through, then an RfC to tighten this would be in order. There's no use in permastubs, and, imho, one can't write a good article from only one substantial source. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 02:34, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Buidhe That is exactly what I’ve been trying to say to them this whole time. In trying to bring this info up to them and do an RfC over that other article (and in case the “feds” are watching, I’m not in any way shape or form trying to canvass you for that AfD or anything related to it. Seriously. I’m just letting you know that I took your opinion into account) the narrative has become that I’m “seething” about the article being declined (obviously I knew the article was gonna get declined for the very reason you said), for giving numerous examples of comments by other administrators that GNG > NMODEL and somehow it’s “inappropriate” for me to do an RfC during AfD, and that I’m mad things aren’t “going my way”. If trying to make them see that NMODEL isn’t exempt from GNG isn’t going my way then they’re right on that. But I’m also trying to get some type of clarity on if that article is kept, should that standard be applied to every single model article. I trust administrators opinions more than anyone else’s and I’m going off what I’ve been told for years. Trillfendi (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Theresienstadt Ghetto
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Theresienstadt Ghetto
Hi Buidhe, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia; I found this an interesting article. I notice you reverted my edits, but don't fully understand your comments. The logic for my changes was:
 * "beautification" is not a great translation of "Verschönerung" in this context. The Nazis implemented a 'clean up' both in the literal sense and metaphorical senses. I accept there may be a better word than either of those.
 * "Prominent" in the middle of a sentence should not be capitalised. If its a quotation, there should be a citation.
 * "superior quarters" is an odd turn of phrase in English. We don't generally talk about living in quarters (unless someone is in the Forces) and "superior" makes it sound as if their original accommodation was actually pretty good, which it clearly wasn't. Bermicourt (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you liked the article! I am a major contributor and got it to GA status.
 * I don't know enough German to say what the correct translation for "Verschönerung" is. However, in the context of Theresienstadt it is typically translated as "beautification" in English language sources. See, for example
 * Likewise, in sources discussing Theresienstadt the "Prominent" prisoners are typically capitalized. However, after checking more sources it seems they differ, so I don't mind if you make the change so long as you apply it to the entire article so it's internally consistent.
 * I would that the third change you suggested is an improvement. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 05:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Cool - well done. I must get some of mine to GA status some time. About "beautification": if the sources widely use it, then that's fine. It's really quite a literal translation, though, and doesn't IMHO take the context into account. But hey ho. Re "Prominent", I guess it depends on whether it's part of a fuller phrase i.e. "Prominent Jews" used in the sources, in which case the "" may need to be around both words. Finally, I think you've missed a word out because I can't tell whether you agree that the third change is an improvement or not! Thanks for being understanding. Bermicourt (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the third one should read "I would agree...". <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 09:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Probably trivial, but "beautification" is what Herman Wouk uses in War and Remembrance. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Hartmann
The contributors must have a chance for a final say. Coffmann must not be allowed to make a decision based on his own opinions and assumptions. Dapi89 (talk) 10:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, followed the procedures of Good article reassessment correctly. If you disagree with the close, either renominate it or ask at WP:Good article help. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">ui</b><b style="color: White">dhe</b> (formerly Catrìona) 10:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No, Coffmann didn't. The concerns were satisfied and he had no support for the latest remarks. Worst still there was no time given to address them. Dapi89 (talk) 10:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

The "How do you do it?" award

 * Wow! I really appreciate it. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 21:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust in Slovakia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Holocaust in Slovakia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 02:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust in Slovakia
The article The Holocaust in Slovakia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Holocaust in Slovakia for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kaufering concentration camp complex
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kaufering concentration camp complex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kaufering concentration camp complex
The article Kaufering concentration camp complex you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kaufering concentration camp complex for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Flossenbürg concentration camp
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flossenbürg concentration camp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Flossenbürg concentration camp
The article Flossenbürg concentration camp you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Flossenbürg concentration camp for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I am extremely impressed by your ability to do so many reviews in a short time. I will try to keep up. :) Thanks! <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 16:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siegfried Lederer.png
Thanks for uploading File:Siegfried Lederer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Dieter Wisliceny.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Helmut Kleinicke.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Helmut Kleinicke
Hello! Your submission of Helmut Kleinicke at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine  ✍  18:46, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945
The article Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for The Holocaust in Slovakia
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

GAR for Molders
Hi Buidhe, my reading of the requirements for delisting an article that has been classed as GA prior to FAC or Milhist ACR delisting is that the article goes back to GA and then a GAR process is undertaken to delist it to whatever class it becomes under WikiProject assessment scales. A GAR can be done individually or as a community process. In this case, an individual GAR seems the most streamlined way to go given there has been good community consensus for delisting at FAR and ACR. I don't wish to be overly bureaucratic about it, but we should follow the established processes for these things, IMHO. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Höss has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Operation Höss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Operation_H%C3%B6ss help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * Why was this submitted to AfC?, Buidhe is autopatrolled. ——  SerialNumber  54129  13:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I found it Pending G13 and used the AfC tools to check for copyvio etc before sending to mainspace. System posted a note here by default. Legacypac (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, no problem. Although—I think it was unfinished? There's a lot of empty sections. ——  SerialNumber  54129  13:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * On reconsideration, Buidhe, I've moved it to your usert space for now, so you can do what you like with it in your own time, without the pressure of clear-up tags. Hope that's OK. ——  SerialNumber  54129  14:33, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theresienstadt Ghetto and the Red Cross
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Theresienstadt Ghetto and the Red Cross you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theresienstadt Ghetto and the Red Cross
The article Theresienstadt Ghetto and the Red Cross you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theresienstadt Ghetto and the Red Cross for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Presidential exemption (Slovak State)
Amakuru (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for AIDS–Holocaust metaphor
Amakuru (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kaufering concentration camp complex
The article Kaufering concentration camp complex you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kaufering concentration camp complex for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust in Slovakia
The article The Holocaust in Slovakia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Holocaust in Slovakia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karl Plagge
The article Karl Plagge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Karl Plagge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)