User talk:Buildbackbetter

September 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michelle Benson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Removed large sections of political commentary and opinion by users. Also corrected reference incorrectly formatted Buildbackbetter (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

DS alert
 Java Hurricane  13:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Also, if you believe that sources cited to support article content are unreliable, you need to explain why. The mere fact that someone who has created a Wikipedia account says they don't believe something isn't enough to justify rejecting sourced material without further explanation. JBW (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.