User talk:Bull-Doser/Archive 3

NAIAS
Well, not this Saturday. It is traditional for me to go the last weekend, as that is when there are less crowds. I will be going twice, actually. Next week on a school field trip, and that Saturday. The field trip will be a very good opportunity for pictures, because there will be less crowds there. I think. I just got fresh batteries in my camera, so I'm ready!

BTW BD, thank you. I am so glad to get a comment on my talk page that isn't one of the GM Minivan vandals attacking me. Karrmann (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:QMLogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:QMLogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Better photo for Suzuki Swift+
Do you think you could snap a better pic of the Swift+. The only Photo in the commons shows a great angle of an Orange Swift+, but it has an accessory wind deflector just above the grill... which hurts the point of the image, since it is to distinquish the difference for instance from a Wave or Aveo... which occurs right at the grille. Thanks. 842U (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Date formats in citations
As per Template:Cite web and any other citation template, stop changing date formats on cites to non-ISO 8601 formats and stop wikilinking access dates in cites as you've done so in this and many other edits. Roguegeek (talk) 00:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Once again, please do not introduce any more incorrect date formats on citations as you have recently done so here once more. It might be a good idea to actually read how to use those citation tags correctly so that editors don't have to constantly fix the reoccurring errors you continually introduce. Roguegeek (talk) 08:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Acura TSX
I somehow had missed your edit to Acura TSX and reverted it. Unless you have any source that the TSX is NOT a predecessor to the Integra Sedan, it will stay like that. Thank you. Ryou-kun16 (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

User:IFCAR
Sockpuppet? ;-) -72.93.80.5 (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No. I'm not a sockpuppet of IFCAR. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Chrysler Aspen Hybrid AfD
Hi, Bull-Doser. Thought you might want to add a comment to the AfD for Chrysler Aspen Hybrid. Also, I've warned User_talk:68DANNY2 for his inappropriate removal of the merge proposal template you applied. If you look at his talk page and contribs, you'll see we are dealing with a bit of an interesting character here. I suspect he will probably sooner than later wind up with some sort of a temporary block. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:QMLogo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:QMLogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Meetup/Montreal
I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in:Meetup/Montreal. Add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Time and place haven't been decided yet. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 13:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Date is set for May 3rd 2008 and Buffet La Stanza is the proposed location. If you have another idea for the location; propose away! Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you maybe aware of and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 05:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Where, in the borough of St. Laurent? -- Bull-Doser (talk) 05:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't want to go, because I went to some people's house for dinner, then a bit of my house and finally the Brasseie Le Manoir. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 22:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank You.
Thank you for changing the tid bit in the FJ Cruiser article that said it was a 2 door. I was going to do so but couldn't think of a way to word it. LAZZO (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Go ahead and leave me a message if there are anymore problems with the FJ Cruiser article.

Mercury Mariner
It seems we are back in contacting you because of a very trivial revert war with you. Yes, although it is good to have a Hybrid image in the article, I don't understand why you insist on making it the head image, especially because it is of poor quality. The wipers are up, and the image is blurry. A FoMoCo promotional image is available freely for us to use, so I don't understand why you insist on using a poor rent parking lot shot instead. Karrmann (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * This probably wouldn't be a problem if you used images with proper copyright, Karrmann. The image you want to use fails fair use because it is a non-commercial CC license. You tagged it improperly and, perhaps, without knowing so. Images with this license are not allowed on Commons. I have flagged it for deletion. Roguegeek (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The copyright had nothing to do with the revert. He reverted the image because it wasn't that of a particular model. Karrmann (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * But the copyright has everything to do with it belonging here or not in the first place. Roguegeek (talk) 20:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:InuYasha.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:InuYasha.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

test
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. &mdash; Blue. 05:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kia Sephia.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kia Sephia.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 12:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Buick Velite.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Buick Velite.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:XMlogo.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:XMlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 21:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

MGM
Hello, I see that you made an edit to the MGM page and asked if it was a private company. Why do you think it is a private company? That just peaked my curiosity. Canyouhearmenow 11:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello! Are you interested in a serious Wikimeetup? -- Crea m y! Talk 01:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess so. Either meet me in Toronto, Montreal (where I live) or Ottawa. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem with Image:'00-'02 Ford E-350 School Bus.JPG
I noticed you uploaded Image:'00-'02 Ford E-350 School Bus.JPG, as your own work with permission as: "All Rights Reserved", as well as in public domain. This is a contradiction. Public domain is "No rights reserved". If this is a mistake, please change it. Otherwise, the image should be deleted from Wikipedia as it is replaceable. Thanks. Cavenba (talk • contribs) 21:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fagget
A tag has been placed on Fagget requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Dadude3320  01:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Geo Metro and Pontiac Firefly
Note, there are discussion pages for these articles, where merging them with the Cultus article was considered and done. This conforms with WPA guidelines. Note that the Cultus article has subsections on the Geo Metro and the Pontiac Firefly.

I will merge these back to the way they were before today. Please discuss and gain consensus before seperating out the Firefly and Metro again. 842U (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Mitsubishi GTO
Your last edit to this page was not minor. Please do not mark it as such in future. Also, it removed information for no reason I can see, so I had to revert it. --DeLarge (talk) 08:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Rear-wheel drive? Where do you get this stuff from? --DeLarge (talk) 07:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * www.automotix.net/partshotline-mitsubishi-3000gt-lights-requests.html -- Bull-Doser (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Moving of "More than a Feeling"
I noticed you moved the "More than a Feeling" article to "More Than a Feeling". I have since moved it back, as both WP:MUSTARD and WP:CAPS specifically state that prepositions (and conjunctions) under five letters should not be capitalized in song titles. "Than" can be both a preposition and a conjunction (see its merriam-webster.com definition.) Thanks for your understanding, Xnux   the   Echidna  01:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

The Beatles infobox
See the discussion at which indicates that if a group lineup was stable during the years the group was famous and are universally known by that lineup, then they can be listed in the "current members" section of the band infobox template. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Whale tails need your help
I have trying to put together a comprehensive story of the Porsche 911 whale tail rear spoilers. But, the without much prior knowledge, the more I am delving into the stuff the ore I am getting lost. May be you can help. Take a look, please. Aditya (talk • contribs) 15:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Old Enough
Do you have a link that "Old Enough" is the next single by the Raconteurs. As fans were told it's "Many Shades of Black".  Red157  ( talk •  contribs )  14:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I heard on R&R's AAA chart it is the 2nd single. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Move Kia Mohave/Borrego back to Kia Borrego?
Hi there, I have been working offsite on an update to this page. However, I think it makes sense to move the page back to being simply "Kia Borrego." I understand Mohave is the Korean name, but surely other Kia vehicles have alternate names there? So, I am inclined to move it back in the interests of consistency and referring to the vehicle as it is referred to in English-language markets. Let me know if you have any objections. NMS Bill (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * NMS Bill, you should request this move from an admin since only they have privileges to change it back. The current naming convention is completely inconsistent with just about every automobile article out there and Bull-Doser, the self-proclaimed best automobile editor, knows this. It shouldn't have been moved in the first place.  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 22:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

convert
Can you please start using the proper convert tag instead of the inaccurate auto in tags? Use convert anytime you need to do a measurement so we don't have to clean up the messes you introduce.  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 02:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Images
Hi Bull-Doser, I've noticed that most of the photos you upload on the Commons have the date of file generation watermarked on the bottom right-hand corner. Since this watermarking looks pretty bad, would you be able to disable that feature on your camera. This information is redundant because the information is already stored in the photo's metadata. For example, if you go to this image and scroll to the page bottom under "Metadata", you will see that the date "01:25, 5 June 2008" in the "Date and time of data generation" field matches the date directly on the image. Regards OSX (talk • contributions) 05:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Pajero (#2)
Your latest edits to Mitsubishi Pajero have been reverted. They (a) contained several grammatical errors, (b) gave precedence to non-metric units in the convert template, even though the correct, metric-first style was already being used, (c) switched from mm to cm for no reason I'm aware of, and (d) removed many existing wikilinks to other articles for no obvious reason. --DeLarge (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: I notice that at User talk:Bull-Doser above, almost exactly one year ago I asked you not to switch around metric and non-metric units. Yet here you are again, on exactly the same article, doing the same thing. Do you have any reason for this continued systematic disruption? Is it a deliberate attempt at fighting metricization? If you want to add the convert template, all you need to do is add the existing metric values already on the page. --DeLarge (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Images (again)
Hi Bull-Doser, I've noticed again that most of the photos you upload on the Commons have the date of file generation watermarked on the bottom right-hand corner. Since this watermarking looks pretty bad, would you be able to disable that feature on your camera. This information is redundant because the information is already stored in the photo's metadata. For example, if you go to this image and scroll to the page bottom under "Metadata", you will see that the date "01:25, 5 June 2008" in the "Date and time of data generation" field matches the date directly on the image. Regards OSX (talk • contributions) 05:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Suzuki Cultus
Did you happen to notice that in your recent editing work on the Suzuki Cultus article, it is now formatted such that large empty spaces show up on the page. Do you want to go back and fix that? 842U (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Challenger
Your edits have been summarily reverted, for the same reasons as Mitsubishi Pajero (see above). --DeLarge (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you can't be bothered to ensure that you're using an image of the correct generation (or even the correct car), stop adding them. This is unacceptable and we aren't going to tolerate your newest method of being disruptive. --Sable232 (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sable232 (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Recent image additions
For the past couple months I've noticed you inserting images of the wrong year or model into articles, most recently here. Others include this (wrong decade), this (wrong decade), this (wrong model of car and wrong decade), and this (wrong year). What's the deal? As far as I know this hasn't been an issue before. It is not all that difficult to find a collector car sales website and simply match the details of the car you photographed to the correct year. Otherwise, maybe you need to request assistance in identifying the cars before you put the images somewhere. Please take note of this. --Sable232 (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I want to second this. Although I appreciate your enthusiasm to contribute to Wikipedia, you MUST research your sources before making edits. The vast majority of your contributions have been resoundingly inaccurate.  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 10:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Date Links
Hey, I saw that you're still linking dates. I figured you would see where I reverted your edit a while back, but I guess not. Per MOS:Dates, we're not linking dates anymore.--Flash176 (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Archiving assistance
Hi Bull-Doser, I saw the archive request on your page. Is it alright if I set up an archivebot? Then that will automatically archive inactive threads every so often, and you won't have to worry about it anymore. :) --Elonka 03:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah. - Bull-Doser (talk) 03:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. I went ahead and manually archived the threads from 2007, and set up the bot to check for anything that has had no activity for 60 days.  I'm not sure when the next pulse is, but it should kick in within the next 24 hours or so.  If you would like it to archive faster than 60 days (or slower), let me know and I'll tweak it for you.  :) --Elonka 05:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

5th-gen Camaro
What is wrong with you? Why do you continually introduce inaccurate information and upload copyrighted images? The 5th-gen production Camaro has been shown at SEVERAL car shows in the US already at did not debut in Paris. If you can not check sources before you add info, I suggest you do not edit on Wikipedia at all.  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 03:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Is there any response to this or can I just assume you will continue to introduce incorrect information?  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 21:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No response?  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 05:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

1st-gen Camaro pics
Bull-Doser, I have removed all images you added into the First-generation Chevrolet Camaro article for several reasons. Most are due to the inaccurate years in which you claim the vehicles are. Others are due to the vehicles being heavily customized. Then there's the poor quality issue as well. As per WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions, I will immediately remove any image of a vehicle that do not meet quality standards, are improperly tagged, or are of a vehicle with any customization on it.  roguegeek  ( talk · cont ) 17:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Date format in cite tag
How many times have editors told you to stop changing the date formats within cite tags? I've lost count. Yet, even with everyone telling you otherwise and pointing you to the template where the documentation specifically reads: "in ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD format, for example "accessdate = 2008-10-17""

...you still decide to make edits like this. Why do you continue to ignore proper template usage? roguegeek (talk·cont) 16:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Important!
Bull-Doser, I know you have a tendency to simply ignore or not respond to most of the requests made on your talk page, but I would highly recommend you join this conversation that is currently taking place. It would definitely benefit all parties involved. roguegeek (talk·cont) 23:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Valentine (restaurant)
Please be more careful when creating articles and redirects. Your creation of the above article and subsequent redirect of the older Valentine (Restaurant) page has wrecked the page history, meaning the article is no longer in compliance with the GFDL. --DeLarge (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Ford F-Series

 * WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions#Images
 * WikiProject Automobiles: Ford press images: free or no?

Please read the policy and the discussion. It's allowed and even DESIRED.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 11:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
Please stop replacing V8 with V8. Redirects are a feature, not a bug. This is a waste of time and server resources. If you don't have anything better to do, ever consider just not editing? --Sable232 (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, what &uarr; he &uarr; said. Please stop making pointless and counterproductive edits. Where you see V8, it's a link to the correct page. Please stop changing it into V8 ; it is one of the behaviours that is getting you talked about and will likely eventually wind you up with restrictions on your ability to edit, so it'll be best if you'll make the grownup decision to edit coöperatively from here on in, thanks. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Your continued disruptive editing after repeated requests to stop is becoming tiring. I have no problem with requesting to have sanctions placed upon you if this continues. --Sable232 (talk) 22:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Images (again)
Hi Bull-Doser, I've noticed again that most of the photos you upload on the Commons have the date of file generation watermarked on the bottom right-hand corner. Since this watermarking looks pretty bad, would you be able to disable that feature on your camera. This information is redundant because the information is already stored in the photo's metadata. For example, if you go to this image and scroll to the page bottom under "Metadata", you will see that the date "01:25, 5 June 2008" in the "Date and time of data generation" field matches the date directly on the image. Regards OSX (talk • contributions) 05:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Bull-Doser, are you actually going to respond? OSX (talk • contributions) 05:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Led Zeppelin Radio
Led Zeppelin Radio is on Channel 12, not 33. Please read the press release at. It will stay on Channel 12 til at least December 31st. MegX (talk) 02:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you intend ignoring this information, I intend marking the edits as vandalism. MegX (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You are using out of date information. The link you added then deleted is referring to last years channel changes, not this year. The channel changes you listed occured before November 2008. MegX (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you check the Sirius site? Also, the changes of The Pulse moving to ch. 12 is from this year. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The site is out-of-date. The channel listing published was before November 1st. Nowhere in the link you provided does it say it was changed on November 12. MegX (talk) 03:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, where's your proof? There is nothing listed in the media that channel changed over on November 12, no official announcement from Sirius either. The press release states that Led Zeppelin Radio is on Channel 12 til December 31st 2008 . MegX (talk) 03:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Check a local Best Buy or other electronics store and tune to the Sirius tuner if ch. 12 lists The Pulse. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've sent an email to Sirius to confirm or deny what is on Channel 12. MegX (talk) 03:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I was at Best Buy today and The Pulse was on ch. 12 and Led Zeppelin Radio was on ch. 33. The tuner listed The Bridge, but played Led Zeppelin music instead, and was still Led Zeppelin Radio. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

1234
Fine on the retitling, but are you going to fix all the articles that link to 1234 (song), to eliminate the link to a redirect?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/1234_(song)&limit=500

Jbening (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Suzuki Cultus
Would you mind looking at that again... it doesn't seem clear. 842U (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Infobox changes
Please stop this latest round of edits. I've no idea what you're trying to do, but the discussion does not prescribe changing calendar years to model years, or changing  to. --DeLarge (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

endash vs hyphen
Please do not demove the endash per this edit, unless it is being improperly used. The relevant sections of the Manual of Style read as follows:
 * WP:DASH: "En dashes... convey the sense of to or through, particularly in ranges (pp. 211–19, 64–75%, the 1939–45 war, May–November)"
 * WP:YEAR: "Year ranges, like all ranges, are separated by an en dash, not a hyphen or slash."

I hope this is clear. --DeLarge (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheBay'08.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:TheBay'08.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Endeavor
Per your edit summary for this diff, that is the very definition of original research and a violation of one of Wikipedia's core policies. Everything you add to Wikipedia, and I mean everything, should be capable of being sourced to a reliable third party. Something somebody "told you" is irrelevant, regardless of whether or not it is true. It would be great if you took some time to familiarize yourself with the Policies and guidelines page, as someone who has been editing as long as you has absolutely no excuse for not following them. The courtesy we extend to newcomers who are unfamiliar with these conventions is not something we should have to extend to you, and your constant flouting of these rules leads to editors wasting their time reverting additions you should never have made in the first place. --DeLarge (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Mitsubishi PS platform, Mitsubishi 380
And again, where are your sources for the edits you made to the above articles? Like I said only yesterday in the above section about the Endeavor, contributions should be based on citing third party sources, not inserting commentary about what you know (or think you know). I've edited and/or reverted your additions, and until you learn to start following Wikipedia guidelines a little more closely, I will continue to do so.

It would also be appreciated, by myself and other editors who've requested it in the past, if you could occasionally respond to comments on these pages, if for no other reason than to acknowledge you've read them. Editing Wikipedia is a consensual process. --DeLarge (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

ERP
Is there any place where it's written that we're required to express a radio station's transmitter power in the format "35,000 watts" rather than "35 kilowatts"? Bearcat (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Various radio station pages use just simplay "watts." -- Bull-Doser (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Orange Julep
Hi. I've been meaning to create an article on the landmark Orange Julep on Decarie. Would you have any photos of the big Orange ball? All I could find in your Commons category were car photos where the restaurant was scarcely visible in the background. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File:'80 MG MGB Roadster (Hudson).JPG

 * Hi, the above image of yours from Commons is on the MGB article. It's difficult to tell from the picture but being described as a 1980 model, I presume it was a chrome bumper conversion to pre 73? Could you clarify, many thanks? Paste  Let’s have a chat. 09:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Forzani Group
Please note that while Athletes World no longer exists in Quebec, it still does in the other provinces. Therefore I have re-added it in the Forzani Group artice.

Regards,

Farine (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CMT 2008 Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:CMT 2008 Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Flash176 (talk) 05:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

KIA Rio
Hi Bull-Doser, why you write in Kia Rio page, that hatchback have new lenght for models 2009? I cannot find source for this information. I find article http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2009-03-19-test-drive-kia-rio-review_N.htm, but i think author is wrong, because sedan lenght have -1 inch. (sorry for my english. russian kia rio fan) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.85.90 (talk) 11:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

56 Chevy image
Hello- I spent quite a bit of time revising this article getting it ready for GA or FL status and will it be nominated shortly. I revised the generations and infoboxes (that were incorrect). The 17 images I included are Chevrolet factory photos and look quite good together. Your '56 Sedan photo was inserted in Gallery by model year to maintain the article's uniform appearance that helps the article. I hope your OK with this. Thanks Vegavairbob (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Bionix
PLEASE stop editing the Bionix article unless you have a tangible proof (i.e. a press release) of what you are saying. 74.58.0.142 (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Model A Ford
I have reverted your change to Ford Model A (1927-1931). While you could make an argument that hot rod culture is important to the history of these cars, the image you took is totally inappropriate for the side bar with info on the original car. -- Bdentremont (talk) 06:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Subaru Legacy (fifth generation)
I have nominated Subaru Legacy (fifth generation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Subaru Legacy (fifth generation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Biker Biker (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

WWPX-DT, among others
Even if the station is digital only, the callsign may officially remain WWPX-TV according to the FCC. No station is required to change their callsign, that is up to the station. Some do, like WTVQ-DT, some don't, like WTOV-TV. It is up to the station. The redirects are not required. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 00:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

WBCN FM
There is no official callsign as WBZ-HD2. That will need to be moved back. Please stop. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 01:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of WTOV-DT
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 01:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 01:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Pandora hearts
Pandora Hearts holds no similarity to Kingdom hearts in ANY way other than the word "hearts' in the name. The two are completely different. Kingdom hearts is about 'hearts' while pandora hearts merely has the word 'hearts' in the title.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Class of Tucson
These your edits are wrong.


 * Tucson (Compact) = Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, Kia Sportage (yes, hyundai undercut the price than CR-V, but it is a same class)
 * Evidence


 * 1) Competitors of CR-V, the Official Honda Web Site
 * 2) Similar Vehicles of Tucson, the Official Hyundai Web Site
 * Check it out. It is a CR-V class


 * Santa Fe (Mid Size) = Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Kia Sorento
 * Veracruz (Luxury) = Lexus RX (without luxury badge), Kia Mohave
 * Check Engine displacement and exterior size of Lexus RX and Veracruz. AND, Verazruz size is identically similar with Lexus RX. See this photo 660gd4qo (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Wrong. Santa Fe is basically a Venza/Edge/Murano fighter.  Veracruz is the Highlander/Pilot/Flex competitor. Veracruz is closer in size & price to the Honda Pilot, and more mainstream over the luxury Lexus RX (whose competitors are Infiniti FX, Volvo XC90 & Cadillac SRX). -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No. That is your subjective opnion. Check Euro Ncap classification.
 * Hyundai Tucson = Honda CR-V = Toyta RAV4 ; Same Class
 * Hyundai Santafe & Kia Sorento = Nissan Pathfinder. Hyundai Santafe & Kia Sorento are cleary out of CR-V class.
 * I prove by very trusted references (Honda, Hyundai official websites, Euro Ncap classification... and i can find more. eg. EPA class), but what is your evidence? 660gd4qo (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) SantaFe is not same class with RAV4 & CR-V.
 * 2) Tucson is a same class with RAV4 & CR-V.
 * 3) Veracruz is not a highlander class. It is a essentially Lexus RX class without luxury badge. (size, engine displacement, luxury features...) even their looks are same.660gd4qo (talk) 03:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Veracruz in North America is priced less over Pilot, Traverse, Flex, CX-9, etc. Pathfinder is a 4Runner/Explorer/Grand Cherokee/H3 competitor. Santa Fe is a competitor to Edge, Venza, Murano, Outback, Endeavor, etc.   The Dodge Journey, which is priced less over a Veracruz, is longer than a Hyundai Veracruz.  I live in Canada, and we've got mostly U.S.-spec vehicles. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 04:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I know Hyundai undercut the price than their competitors. According to price range, maybe your claim is right. But, Actually thery are not same class. Hyundai sonata is same class with Toyota Camry, Honda Accord. But, its price similar with Honda Civic, Toyota corolla. But, it is hard to say, Hyundai sonata is same class with civic & corolla. I point out acutual competitor. not price competiotor.

My reference based on...
 * 1) EPA, Euro NCAP Classification
 * 2) Official website of manufacturers
 * 3) Exterior Size, Interior Volume, Features, Engine displacement
 * 4) Ignore badge, price 660gd4qo (talk) 04:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sonata is classified as a large car by the EPA, and sized more like the midsize Volkswagen Passat, even though Camry & Altima are an inch longer, and Accord is 5 inches longer than Passat & Sonata. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

2010 models/fueleconomy.gov
"According to Fueleconomy.gov, there's a '10 Solstice."

Fueleconomy.gov is not a reliable source of what actually makes it to market. GM may have tested a '10 model with EPA at one point, but reality obviously changed rapidly for Pontiac and Saturn this summer. Likewise, GM's 2010 Fleet PDF is outdated and shows 2010 models which have since been cancelled. The only reliable sources of a '10 model are a press release by the company with price, and its existence in dealer inventories. --Vossanova o< 15:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Canwest reorganization
I've reverted a couple of your changes which seem to suggest that Canwest's TV operations are up for sale. As best as I understand it, Canwest is filing for bankruptcy protection as part of a reorganization that is supposed to keep the company intact (albeit under new ownership by Canwest's creditors). While certainly not impossible, any suggestion that Canwest will be selling more assets is purely speculation. &mdash; stickguy (:^›)&mdash; || talk || 01:14, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Place Ville-Marie
Hi there,

I see on your user page that you live in Montreal. I am going to assume that you have heard of Place Ville-Marie in asking you this question. The reports of the number of floors in Place Ville-Marie vary from 43 to 46. Do you, with your Montreal expertise, know the actual number of floors in this structure, or could you possibly visit this building to find out? Thanks,

-Stuck in Edmonton 117Avenue (talk) 22:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


 * No. And I will NOT visit this building! -- Bull-Doser (talk) 00:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks anyways, 117Avenue (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Flat engines
Are you going to move flat-twin, flat-12 and flat-16 to be consistent with the other article moves? I think you should. --Biker Biker (talk) 07:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Dodge Truck?


This is a GMC, not a Dodge. The grille, the side marker lights, all point to GM, not Dodge. Plus take a close look at the hubcaps.

See here for another example of this truck.

Regards. --Manway (talk) 22:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Not Advance Design
This picture is of a pre-1947 Chevrolet and not an Advance Design truck.--Ridge Runner (talk) 09:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)



ZDX
You reverted the addition of what looks like a user created image of the production model of this vehicle, saying that it was improper use of fair use. It doesn't look like the image is a fair use image, it is apparently user created and released to the public domain. --Leivick (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The image was a blatant copyright violation (Acura press photo) and has been tagged on Commons for speedy deletion. --Sable232 (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Facelift sections
There is absolutely no "rule" about where the image of a facelifted vehicle can be included in an article. Infobox images are determined first and foremost by image quality. IFCAR (talk) 12:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Ford Fiesta
Please only change pictures being better than the old one! Your Fiesta-picture is not as good as mine. Best wishes. -- S 400 HYBRID (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Dude, I understand self-esteem is important, but would you mind removing your pic from the Mark VI specs please? First of all, I already uploaded a similar version below, and this is not a picture contest, if you think that you "lost the race" - maybe go do something else, like, I dunno, shoot butterflies. Second, the 2011 sedan is not in production yet. Wikipedia doesn't need unmarketed content as examples, this is clearly not a picture to have in the description blank for Mark VI. I agree that having two same pictures (at the top and there) is lame, but yours just doesn't help the case, sorry. So... would you mind? Thanks, Shadiac (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Toyota Sienna
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toyota_Sienna&oldid=339659347 appears to constitute vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Don't make me push the red button, dude. Shadiac (talk) 20:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Meadows Frisky
Hi Bull-Dozer

I've reverted your edits to the infobox in the above article because they duplicate information already provided in the article or more clearly shown in the table at the foot of the page. Ultimately it would be better to have an individual page for each version of the car which could have a more detailed infobox, in the same way as its done on Ford Mustang and First-generation_Ford_Mustang for example, but trying to cover every variation in asingle infobox brings it close to the Ponte Vecchio example cited on this page Disinfoboxes. Regards Mighty Antar (talk) 14:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for discussing your changes on the talk page in a rational and sensible manner. The idea behind wikipedia is actually to improve the thing. Something you might be able to do better if you used common sense and discussed things rather than making blanket statements "Infoboxes are the correct place for dimensions & engine info." may be correct where you are talking about a single car, but not in this instance.Mighty Antar (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Bull-Dozer

I've removed the picture of the 59 Frisky you added to the above page because the car has been heavily customised. The car in your photo was originally a Frisky Family Three saloon and Frisky never built any three wheeled convertibles. I've added it to the Meadows vehicles category on commons. Mighty Antar (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Anime Channel
I have nominated The Anime Channel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Anime Channel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CHOM &#39;10.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CHOM &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Car photo taken on 8/16/08 at the Rassemblement Car Show
I was wondering if you knew the Tires Sizes on a Chevy Monte Carlo SS it is the one you took photos of at the Rassemblement Rigaud Car Show that posted at the wikipedia page about the fourth generation Monte Carlo. If you do not remember I would like to know if you had the car owners information.

(Al) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.14.133 (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

CKPK-FM
You need to provide an actual media source to prove that a station's format is actually changing from adult album alternative to modern rock; it's not okay to simply assert that it is, especially when the station's current Top 30 chart on its own website is still top-to-bottom Metric-Great Lake Swimmers-Vince Vacarro-Avett Brothers-David Gray AAA. Bearcat (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please comment
Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:07, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:96RockLogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:96RockLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Final warning
In regards to this edit: The next time you deliberately use incorrect formatting or otherwise violate the Manual of Style, you will be reported to AN/I. --Sable232 (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I was just posting an '80 Oldsmobile Omega sedan image in the streets of New Westminster, a suburb of Vancouver, even though it was the last day of the 2010 Winter Olympics. No one can find Oldsmobile Omegas the streets of Montreal, where I currently live. But, I once found a rare '84-'85 Ford Tempo back in 2007 in Montreal. I have also been supporting rare old cars in Montreal, such as the early Hyundai Sonata models, even the Sonata's predecessor, the Hyundai Stellar. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * You don't really think this had anything to do with the image, do you? I was talking about your refusal to use spaces between a figure and a unit (e.g. 2.8 L) and the standard that pre-1980 vehicles use cubic inches, not liters, both pursuant to WP:AUN, the first also per MOSNUM. --Sable232 (talk) 00:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Mazda RX-7
Just to tell you that you should change the image of the black RX-7, cause it have a V-8 instead of a rotary, so it's not a true RX-7. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Eff (talk • contribs) 02:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

You're invited!
Hello, Bull-Doser,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec) Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Carrefour Laval
It would be a great idea to check your sources before posting information. What you posted was not only trivial, it was patently false. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * KFC was there a long time ago, but it had closed down. I was there at the mall back then, but I went more recently, and KFC disappeared.  It's not at the new food court, either. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you marked it as having shut down in 2006. Its last day of operation was the Friday before the new food court opened. (I remember being told they had no soft drinks left.) Anyway, since it's not an anchor, mentioning it violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Suzuki Jimny
Hello, I appreciate some of the work you did on the Suzuki Jimny page but have some serious reservations:

Replacing 359 cc with 21.9 cuin is not an improvement. The Jimny/Samurai/etc etc have been sold all over the world, with only a comparably limited presence in the United States. They have only ever been marketed in SI terms, with all model names reflecting the engine size in ccs/litres - Jimny 55, LJ80, SJ413 and so on. Most engine options were never even offered stateside in the first place, I believe only the 1324 cc engine was ever officially sold here. Additionally, with such small displacement engines the difference between for instance a 543 and a 539 cc engine will not even show if they're both displayed as 0.5L. This has been discussed any number of times, and please also visit the WikiProject Automobiles Conventions page, in particular AUN.

I frankly don't see a need to include CIs on the Jimny page at all: Engines of such small displacement are rarely referred to in terms of cube inches, compare with motorcycles for instance. In any case, the Jimny is not a pre-1980 US car nor a pre-1974 Australian car.

Also, why remove all of the Japanese text from the page and replace it with question marks? Even if it may not show up in some people's browsers, it may still be useful to some. Again, I am glad for all the other edits (removing links to years and such), I will try to make that available again. Best,  ⊂ Mr.choppers ⊃   (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lexus MC


The article Lexus MC has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This page is based on pure speculation from 2006+ that has yet to eventuate. Google brings up nothing relevant on the subject of "Lexus MC" and the alternative "Lexus JX" name is only based on speculation. No reliable sources can confirm the existence of this car.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OSX (talk • contributions) 07:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Ford Transit
In your recent edit of the Ford Transit page you make reference to it replacing the Ford Freestar. You appear to have confused the Ford Transit with the Ford Transit Connect and looking at the Ford Freestar it's more likely that the Ford Tourneo Connect is the vehicle that replaced it, both of the Connect vehicles have separate pages. The Transit Connect is a cargo van and the Tourneo Connect is a passenger carrying vehicle.90.206.63.221 (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Bruno Mars
Hi Bull-Doser. What's going on with radio stations and Bruno Mars? (You have not provided sourcing for your edits.) Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

timestamp watermarks
Hello,

Thanks for all car's pictures. Juste coul'd you not use timestamp watermarks. This is a lot of work to supress thats marks.

--Titimaster (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Merger discussion
As the main contributors to the Honda Civic Hybrid I would like to let you know that this merger discussion is taking place here just in case you want to participate.-Mariordo (talk) 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops, I did not realized you also are the main contributor to the Honda Accord Hybrid. There is also a discussion about it going on here just in case you want to participate.-Mariordo (talk) 21:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

WLNK
I saw references to this on another site. Where exactly, though, did you get the information about WLNK being moved from hot AC to AC? Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 17:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * http://addboard.mediabase.com/menu.asp and click on "AC" on the "Reporting Panel" section. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 00:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I added that to the article. What about Nielsen? Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Old Radio Margaritaville.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Old Radio Margaritaville.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Old Luxury Car edits
I appreciate your enthusiasm but please be careful in your photographic edits.

1) I love the 1961 Lincoln Continental image you replaced the previous one with. It's a substantial improvement over the one with the man walking in front.

2) The image you inserted into the Coupe de Ville page was not of an image of a 1965-70 Coupe de Ville El Clasico. It was a 1971 or 1972 Eldorado El Clasico convertible. 1971-76 Eldorados belong with 1971-1976 Eldorados. (And there are no "convertible Coupe de Villes" only "de Ville convertibles." There are significant defects with the de Ville pages and I'm about to remedy some of them.)

3) I've done a lot of work on the Imperial page and most of the images there have been very carefully selected by me. The fuzzy akilter image you inserted of a 1966 Imperial front end works at cross purposes with the text I wrote. Significant changes occurred to the rear end in 1966 and that is therefore a distinctive one year only appearance.

So I've undone two of the three changes you made (at least that I've noticed so far). Please don't view this as an "edit war". As I said before I very much love one of the changes you made. If you dig up any other high quality images that fit in with the text I'll gladly leave them alone. But keep in mind these are meant to be encyclopedic entries and the images are frequently there on purpose to connect with the text, so please be careful.

Sadowski (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo (F07)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo (F07). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Srobak (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Talk:BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo (F07)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Talk:BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo (F07). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Talk:BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Talk:BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Srobak (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo (F07)
Please ignore the warnings above. There's never anything wrong with creating a plausible redirect to an existing article. Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not plausible - it's redundant. Please take a close look at the name of the article, and then the name of the redirect. Srobak (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

MGB photo
Could you check your file description at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%2775_MG_MGB_(Orange_Julep).jpg? I left some comments on discussion as I believe it is not a 1975 as described. CompRhetoric (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Help to date a photo
I noticed that you may be an expert on old automobiles. May I ask for your assistance to date an old photo? The date on this photo is vague, it only said "191?" on the site I got it from, so that would mean it dates back to the decade of the 1910's. I believe the automobiles pictured may be later models and would not fit a 1910's dating. What do you think? (I am interested in the photo of the bridge itself, the automobiles would help me date the photo.) Thank you for any opinions you may offer. Gamweb (talk) 10:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Pics
Hi You're doing good job snapping pics of classic cars, but Please stop putting Your pictures everywhere and replace perfectly fine with irrelevant ones, disregarding context (just because You want Yours to be exposed?). For instance just recently You've put picture of Eldorado (You marked it as de Ville but it's Eldo actually) into Coupe de Ville article, and now You've deleted gallery with body styles in Mustang article and put some picture of nose which is pointless as current pictures are there in purpose - to show the differences in bodies and it doesn't matter that mach 1 has own article at that point, because it's there to show body style not the trim.

If You'd like to do something good however, You could replace picture of 1971-1973 Mustang convertible with original one as in currently featured car owner changed grille to the one from mach 1, but convertible was never offered in this trim.

SHAMAN 13:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Valiant images
Bull-Doser, you're in Canada, which explains how you're able to get nice pics of Canadian cars. Please keep contributing good quality images like these, but please take care to mind the differences between Canadian- and US-model cars, particularly pre-1967, and name, caption, and apply the images appropriately. Would you mind please double-checking and fixing the file names, categories, and (as applicable) captions on your photos of pre-1967 North American vehicles to make sure they're accurate? Thanks. In Plymouth Valiant, I've moved this image of the turquoise '64 Canadian Valiant convertible to the relevant section of the article. It is clearly a Canadian model; take a look at the rear quarter panels and the "VALIANT" nose badge. That also means it is not a Plymouth; Valiants were not sold as such in Canada until 1967. Likewise, this image of the '63 Signet, while it is of good quality, might not be the most appropriate one for the infobox. It shows a Canadian 1963 Valiant Signet—again, very obvious by the quarter panels and rear side glass shape, and again, not a Plymouth. Same deal again with this image. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 20:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

And again
Bull-Doser, it is not acceptable for you to refuse to engage in discussion of your contributions, particularly ones that have been called out as problematic. I have removed your latest improperly-placed image of an improperly-identified car in Plymouth Valiant. I know you are capable of understanding the simple problem. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 22:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Dodge Dart and Dodge Aspen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bull-Doser, much as I hate to issue a warning like this to an experienced editor such as yourself, you refuse to engage with ordinary attempts at discussion and so I have no choice. You need to stop making changes to model succession information based only on what you think you know. I have just finished cleaning up the mess you made of the succession info in Dodge Dart and Dodge Aspen, now must go and see what other articles you've damaged. You will never find a reliable source to support your bizarre claim that the Diplomat replaced the Dart, that the Aspen didn't replace the Dart, or that the Challenger and Barracuda were succeeded by the Aspen/Volaré. It is clear you do not have the knowledge you think you have in this area, so please just stop now and take a few moments to remember that WP:V and WP:CITE apply to you just as to all other editors. Do not make changes based on guesses or assumptions. Just stop! —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 08:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

WZFT / WWMX / WIAD
Hi! WIAD and WWMX, while sister stations, are in different markets. The fact that the two markets, Baltimore and Washington, share many of the signals does not mean that the stations are operated as the same cluster (which is what your reasoning seems to claim). Mediabase classifies both WIAD and WWMX as Hot ACs. The musical direction of WWMX should not be included in an article about WZFT as a basis for any adjustment by Clear Channel to 104.3 without being sourced. The reason that CC flipped Channel 104.3 to Z104.3 was to bring CHR to Baltimore and beat CBS to the punch, as it had been rumored within the radio industry that CBS may have been looking at WWMX as the next "Amp" or "Now" brand. The adjustments to the music on WWMX came after Z104.3 was launched. --Strikerforce (talk) 05:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Excellent Change in Photos but Wrong Generation
Let me congratulate you on finding a lovely photo of a stock 1947 Oldsmobile 98 as well as a good photo of a 1949 Oldsmobile 98. I had inserted a custom car photo in the 1948-53 section hoping that a better one would come along. You found one.

But the photo you inserted in the infobox for the 1948-1953s was actually a 1947. But it was better than the 1947 photo I had put in the info box previously so I moved your's there.

In short your photo additions are greatly desired. But I have to spend time moving them around so things are more correct.

May I make a suggestion? For one who is so interested in old American cars, why not purchase the Standard Catalog of American Cars (Krause piblications in three volumes)? I love your image additions but I hate spending the time correcting what I consider are silly mistakes. And I may not be around forever to correct your mistakes. Someone will have to carry on. Let it be you.

Sadowski (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

CKPK-FM
The Peak's own website features Florence and the Machine in the banner, and artists like The Black Keys, Adele, Mumford and Sons, Mother Mother, Ray Lamontagne, The Decemberists, The National, Jack Johnson, Broken Bells and Arcade Fire in its current Top 30 chart. That bears absolutely no relation whatsoever to what gets played on modern rock stations in 2011; it's an adult album alternative playlist through and through. Leave the article alone, please; this isn't the first time I've pointed out to you that the station's playlist has absolutely nothing "modern rock" about it. Bearcat (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3rd Gen Civic Sedan.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:3rd Gen Civic Sedan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Toyota Sequoia
I've noticed that you've undid my edits to Toyota Sequoia. I understand that all engines are V8s and that they are built in the US. But when I put (US), I meant that the car is a US model. Are all Sequoias US models? 161.130.178.7 (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Grand Prix picture
Good morning!

I noticed your addition to the Grand Prix page, the picture of the gold Grand Prix at Les chauds vendredis.

I didn't think Pontiac made any more full size Grand Prix vehicles after 1968? I may be wrong and way too American-centric in my thinking, and please correct me if I am, but I believe what you have there is a 1970 Bonneville.

Here are two pictures to compare: http://files.americar.de/trade_images/2008/08/b1b94fac6e263296a0b1276c1c82b386.jpg is a 1970 Bonneville

http://www.pontiacserver.com/70gp_blk.jpg is a 1970 Grand Prix.

Two completely different vehicles. Unless there was a special Grand Prix model made for Canada? I'm an old Pontiac fan (all my parents ever bought in the 1960s and early '70s) and I don't remember a special model.

Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, -- Man way  14:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)