User talk:Bullcat99

Conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. BlueAzure (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd appreciate a fuller accounting of how I fall under any of these guidelines. Apparently examining neutral, objective information and providing an analysis of said information leads to a accusations of a personal nature. I am happy to discuss issues about objective facts, but find bare accusations offensive. I hope you will keep the discourse civil and address it on its merits, rather than engage in ad hominem attacks. Bullcat99 (talk) 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)