User talk:Bullenwächter

Category
Do you need to have your page User:Bullenwächter/Test1 on the category "Ancient Germanic Peoples"? It doesn't look serious...
 * Hello - not yet as I am still working on this page and I will add it soon to the encyclopedia when it is ready. Bullenwächter 20:06, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lentienses
Hi Andreas. I've just done some work on this article, but there are a couple of passages that I couldn't understand. I've taken them out and put them on the Talk:Lentienses page. I'd be very grateful if you could let me know what you meant by them, so that I can rewrite them and put them back in the article. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I've looked at the material that you left on the talk page. I was still a little unsure about the second sentence; could you check the main Lentienses article to make sure that I've understood you correctly? Many thanks. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:26, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please feel free to send me the text to look at. And if I ever have the courage to try translating any of my work into German, perhaps I could send it to you? (Don't worry &mdash; it won't happen soon, if at all.). Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 10:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I've now worked on all four articles mentioned on your User page; it would be good if you could look at them to make sure that I haven't made any factual errors. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 13:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ah, yes, I wondered about castle. Perhaps I'll just add more detail; see what you think. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 15:20, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I've just edited the Francisca and Iller articles; there's just one sentence in the former that I don't understand, which I've copied to Talk:Francisca. Could you check the main articles too, in case I've made any errors? Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 17:06, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The articles seem to be OK --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Stoneyislandman
Hi Bullenwächter! Glad you liked it. Won't be able to dig up the notes for a few days yet; will also see if I can find any purely academic references to it. Will be in touch sometime in January. Merry Christmas! Fergananim (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Hi! Thank you! --Bullenwächter (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Help!
Hello, Bullenwächter

I looked over your article, and I corrected what I was able to. I do have a question though; It said The collected his information from archives...Was the 'the' supposed to be meaning that someone collected his information? Or was it supposed to be 'the'. I hope you succeed with your article, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Gourami Watcher! Thank you a lot for your help. The sentence should read: He collectd his information ..... I will correct it. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Image Editing Request
Hi, Bullenwächter, I saw your picture of the Husbäke man, I noticed it was a little dark, would it be okay with you if I edited it to make it brighter? Thank you, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello Gourami Watcher. Thanks for your proposal. It was very hard to make a photo of the Husbäke man, as the big windows in the background were gleaning on the large glass plate in front of the exhibits and you can see me shadowing the upper body of the Husbäke man. That time I only had a compact camera, with my actual camera this problem will not be so big and I hope I will have the opportunity soon to visit the museum in the near future again. Now to your request. On the right side of the picture is a region which was shadowed from the background illumination. I would purpose to make splitted density changes to the image. Only to brighten up the head and chest of Husbäke man on the right side to a density like his pelvis and legs. I would advise NOT to brigten up the legs and pelvis as they are roughly depicting the acutal colour of the body. On the other hand I would purpose to darken up the left side of the lower and upper turf wall to the density of the right side. (if possible) The turf wall is a real turf profile displaying the body on his original depth from the ground surface but it is more or less a decorational object.

What do you think about it? --Bullenwächter (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do. Thank you!--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 23:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Alternativel I can also ask the Photo-Workshop at the German Wikipedia. --Bullenwächter (talk) 09:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that would probably work better, since I'm not as experienced as they are there. Thanks :)

--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I will ask them in the next days. --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Bog body identification
Sorry to bother you, Bullenwächter, I am working on a userspace for the List of bog bodies, and I was wondering if since you seen to know a lot about bog bodies, if you could maybe tell me if the the bog body in the link that I have attached is that of the "Mädchen von Röst". Thank you, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 23:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello Gourami Watcher! Yes that is the "Mädchen von Röst" (Röst Girl), unfortunately her remains were destroyed in Kiel by bombs in WW-II. Your bog bodies list is a good idea. In case you need any assistance please contact me. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 19:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

List of bog bodies
Hi Bullenwachter, the userspace that we were working on I had publicly moved under List of bog bodies on the English wiki. Thanks agian for your help! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi! I have seen it already. Great work! --Bullenwächter (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Andi,

I noticed that the Rost Girl was discovered in 1926, and the picture of her might have had its copyright expired, and could be used as a. Because I'm still learning about images, do you think you could help me by uploading the image? Thank you,  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 18:28, 3 July 2011
 * Hi, According to German law the copyright is expyring 70 years after the photographers death and as the name of the photographer and his day of death is not known to me the use of the licence would be problematic. I don't know if there is an original photo available of the find which can be uploaded. Unfortunately I have not yet received any answers from Archaeological Museum of Schleswig-Holstein on several requests. I think I have to try to find other contacts either via my membership at Archaeological Society of Schleswig-Holstein or on the next coming EXAR-Conference in October at the Museum. I'l try to get an official scan of the photo. --Bullenwächter (talk) talk:Bullenwächter#top|talk]])
 * Alright, thanks. I apreciate your reply. --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Andi, I hope you had a great trip!

I noticed that the entries for the Peiting Woman and the Skrydstrup Woman on the Bog body list... were they different people or the smame person?? Anyway, I'd really like to thank you for your help on the list...
 * Hi Gourami Watcher! Thanks for the Barnstar ;-) The Skrystrup Woman is NOT a bog body, her body survived in a nearly water logged oak-koffin in a mound dating to the nordic bronze age in Denmark. Here you will find more infos for the moment and you should remove her from the list. The Peiting woman is from Bavaria, Germany, she is a bog body dated to the middle ages, approx. 3000 yearl later than Skrystrup woman. --Bullenwächter (talk) 10:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome! Thank you for your help once again :-) --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 22:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk Back
I came across this image of some bog remains at the Landesmuseum Natur und Mensch. Could it be that of Damendorf 1884, Damendorf 1934, Husbäke 1931, Dätgen 1906 or Brammer man 1906?--   Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 22:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The image does not show a bog body, this are two pieces of peat and a piece of human hairs between them. According to the page Mummytomb they have been found 1886 in the Bog Molberger Dose. I have been at the Landesmuseum Oldenburg twice, but unfortunately I havn't photographed this hair and its information board. There are many finds of human hair pieces and hair braids reported from Germany and Denmark. For example look here National Museum of Denmark in the box on the top right of the page (unfortunately not available in English. --Bullenwächter (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Once again, thank you for your help! I am also fixing the Jurdenerfeld Man's image as well as the Hubake Man because I had previously increased the brigtness too much. The commons won't let me re upload them again... would you know how to? --   Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 14:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * There is a link on the images page "Upload a new version of this file" which you have to use for uploading the corrected version of the image. I would also reccomend to reduce the brightness of commons:File:Mann_aus_Jührdenerfeld.jpg and commons:File:Husbäke Man 1936.jpg approximately to the half of the original compared to your last versions. They are definitively too bright. --Bullenwächter (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I admit I did add too much brigtness, but the brightness of the image will not change... there must be something wrong. I found this image of a woman from "the 1600s" at the Archäologische Staatssammlung museum, could you please tell me who she would be? Image thank you! --   Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 01:32, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please wait with the images of Jührdenerfeld Man and Husbäke Man. I will try to adjust the brightness and contrast on the original images in my archive and upload them again. The Mummy of Archäologische Staatssammlung München is a peruanian mummy of 15-17th century, which has been excarvated by Bavarian Princess Therese von Bayern 1898 and brought the Ethnological Muesum in Munich, later it has been transferred to the Anatomical Museum which has been destroyd by bombs during WW-II. The Mummy has been found in the ruins of the museum and was buried by the workers beleiving it was a modern victim of the bobings. Shortly later it has been excarvated again by the museums staff beleiving it was a bog body from a bog near Dachau. The mummy was transferred to Archäologische Staatssammlung Bavarian State Archaeological Collection in 1977 and been on display there and described as bog Body. 2007 the mummy was removed from the display due to a parasites affection and after recognition that it could not be a bog body it has undergone intensive scientific investigations which proved that it is a mummy from a specific region in Chile/Peru, most probably belonging to Chinchorro culture. Sadly I have not yet found any English literature about her. Here ist the German article: de:Mumie aus dem Dachauer Moos --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll wait with the images. Thank you for the link!--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 02:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Help
Okay Andi! I'll look over it as soon as possible! Auf Wiederzerhen! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article looks fine and only had minimal errors. Danke, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Images
Hallo Andi, I've uploaded some fair use images of some bog bodies for the English Wikipedia, but I would like to have them on the German Wikipedia as well. Do you thing you could help me?
 * File:Yde Face Reconstruction.jpg
 * File:Kayhausen Boy.jpg
 * File:Emmer-Erfscheidenveen Man.jpg
 * File:Amcotts Moor Woman Shoe.jpg
 * File:Elling Woman.jpg
 * File:Moora Digital Face Reconstruction.jpg
 * File:Borremose Man.jpg (Uploaded on my alternate account)

Hi. Some of the images I already uploaded to commons such as Yde Face Reco, Emmer-Erfscheindenveen Man but they have been deleted as I was not able to get a proper permission from the Drents Museum in Assen Netherlands where I get the photos. That was a pitty. As far as I know fair use taged images can be used in the English WP, but not in the German WP for local copyright regulations, which are much more strict. Images can be enterd into the German Wikipedia when they are uploaded at commons. In the German WP we can use images only with a written permission from the author/photographer/painter or when he died more than 70 year ago.--Bullenwächter (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Sometimes copyright can be a real bother! I uploaded the images with a "Non-free historic image" liscense, so they could be used as low resolution images, so they aren't actually free liscense images. Would this make any difference?--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 23:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately not. Also small and low resolution copies of copyrighted materials are protected by the copyright, except when the image has been substantially edited so that it turns into an own creative work, but that is hard to reach with images of bog bodies as. Copyright is such a difficoult issue. For example the image File:Moora Digital Face Reconstruction.jpg has been made with a modern facial composite software usted by Kriminalpolizei. The software contains thousands of different images of face components which have been made/edited by many different people, this components can be rendered to a complete image. I guess there was not only one single person working on Mooras face reconstruction image, additionally the background or purpose of the image is not to be an artwork but it is an scientific illustration and still is is copyright protected. Even a X-ray image of the Kayhausen Boy has been deleted on commons as it was classifed as an copyright protected artwork ;-( Sometimes it is hard for me to understand the borderline between a copyright protected (art)wortk and a free work. I think one has to be a lawyer for that.... Have a nice sunday --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, at least we can still link the images. Danke! :) --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 19:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Tschüs
I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Tschüs-- Amy Z (talk) 05:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Korrecktur lesen ihre Artikel
Hallo Andi, I looked at your article and all it really needed was a few commas or apostrophes. I'd advise you to add more to the blank section Publications. Tag!
 * Hallo! Danke für Deine Korrekturen. I know it but it was too late yesterday evening for collecting the information for his English publications. Now I have added some titles. Ich wünsche Dir einen Schönen Tag. Tschüß! --Bullenwächter (talk) 11:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Viel Glück mit Ihrem Artikel! Haben einen schönen Tag! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 00:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Skrydstrup Woman
Hallo Men Freund! A few weeks ago I had found a very good image of the Skrystrup Woman in the Commons or Wikipedia, but when I added an entry about her on the mummy article, I could not find that image. Could you help me please? Bis dann, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 00:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Hallo! The name of the woman is Skrydstrup Woman. As far as I can see there is only a photo of her hair net available at commmons but no photo of the body is available. I think I have photos of her but they are of a very poor quality as it was very dark in the exhibition room. I will look at home if I can do something. Tschüß --Bullenwächter (talk) 14:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Danke schön! That would be great! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 23:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I have no photos of the Skrydstrup woman, as it was not possible in the exhibition hall with my old camera ;-(( --Bullenwächter (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I did however find an image of her by searching through the commons. I added it to the Frau von Skrydstrup article, Danke schön for your efforts on finding your own image. Tschüß!--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 02:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thats funny, I already had the file on my watchlist, but ditn't find it, now everything is clear - Thanks --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sie sind Welkommen! I suppose that because the image was uploaded with a Swedish file name made it quite a bit harder to find. Auf wiedersehn! :)

--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 18:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Windeby
I do have just one other question about Windeby I. The picture File:Windeby I bones.jpg shows the bones of the mummy, so did the actual corpse decompose? Or were they just replicas? I'm a little confused about this. Danke schön, --   Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 23:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Servus! As far as I recall it from the literature Karls Schlabow, who conserved the find has very poorly documented his procedures. The bones has been removed from the body, the skull has been opened and the brain was taken out and cut into pieces, all intesitnals has been removed for examination. The remained hide and soft tissue has been tanned and treated with (mineralic) oil, tar or other substances. The hide has been mounted on a base of something to achieve a form that looks like the body after its excavation. What you seen of the body on display in the museum is only the covering hide tissue on a model of turf or other material. But please don't use this info as reference as I only recalled it and I read the relevant literatur some year ago and the German article is still waiting to be extended. --Bullenwächter (talk) 10:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Danke schön! It's always good to learn something new. --   Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 15:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Tschüs
Hi. Although I  agree entirely about  the use of the word Tschüs, the article is still  completely  unsourced and as it  stands is WP:OR. If it is not  referenced soon,  my  fear is that  it  may  be in  line for deletion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

On second thoughts, I  realised that there is an entry  for this on  Wiktionary, so  I've made a soft  redirect. Feel free to improve or expand the Wiktionary  entry. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Mike Parker Pearson
See Talk:Mike Parker Pearson, I reverted your rename as WP:COMMONNAME is clear that the most common usage should be used when choosing the name of an article. Having done that I also reverted the changes you made to articles linking to Pearson. I hope you are OK with that, but if you aren't please discuss on the article's talk page as any rename back to Michael would clearly need discussing as a controversial move. Thanks. --Bob Re-born (talk) 10:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Bob Re-born. Its a bit strange to me, when I look into his publications or when I search library catalogues I will only find "Michael". In my opinion a decision on seach engie results is a bit problematic as we don't know the search engine providers policy of presenting its results. But its OK for me, as far as a redirection form his full name Michael Parker Pearson exists. --Bullenwächter (talk) 11:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Catalogues tend to use full names for all authors, but if you look at the covers of any of his books, or his own profile at University of Sheffield you will see him referred to as Mike. Furthermore he is credited as Mike on the TV programmes that he has appeared on e.g. PBS, and National Geographic. Other examples include his IMDB profile. --Bob Re-born (talk) 12:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * When I search at the Northern Germany GBV Union catalogue it's 18 (Michael) : 6 (Mike). The British Library gives 21 results for Mike and 22 for Michael. I can find no rule behind the use of his first name and his nick name and it doesn't seem that Mike is used form certain time on. He uses both names in his scientific and popular publications. --Bullenwächter (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Questions
Hallo Andi! Because I am not as knowledgeable about bog bodies as you, I fear I may have miss titled the image File:Nederfrederikmose Tunic.jpg which may come from a completely different bog body. Would you know the answer? Tschuss, --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 03:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Its correct. According to http://www.frederiksdal-info.dk/frederiksdalmanden.htm the tunic has been found near Nederfrederiksdal Man (also knows as Kragelund Man). --Bullenwächter (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Danke schőn!--  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 19:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Gourami Watcher/list of bog bodies
Hallo mein Freund,

I've been working on a new organization for the English article for the bog body list at User:Gourami Watcher/list of bog bodies. I'm looking for the city/town state that the bog body was found although my resources are limited. Would you help me on this please? Danke schön. --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 01:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Gourami Watcher! Of course I like to help you. Please let me know which data you are looking for exactly. --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Andi,

I'd like to have for the location section of each bog body the state that it was found in, for example, Windeby I would have, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Bis Dann! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have entered the regions as far as I know them. For the missing ones I have to look into the literature. --Bullenwächter (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Danke schön for you efforts! I have now merged the userspace to the original article. Once again, Thank You! --  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 17:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.
Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis, currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

'''Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone!''' :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=82379912 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry I was not able to participate yet. --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Image description
Hello, here You've requested translation for image description. I managed to translate the first sentence, but I don't know what the ghost lines are. Can You please explain this to me, so I can continue with translation? --Murúg (talk) 13:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Murúg. Ghost lines are cutting marks from the adzes blade on the wood of the threes stump when wooden chips has been cut out of it. I hope this will clarify the term a bit if not, please ask again... --Bullenwächter (talk) 21:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Wulfsen horse burial site
Hello, unfortunately I can't read or write German. I saw the images in Wikimedia Commons, and noticed that they didn't have an article in English or French. I ran the German site through Google translate, and I put up what came out, with grammar corrections. That's all I know about the burial site, even a Google search didn't turn up much... Oaktree b (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Parts of the discussion transferred to Talk:Wulfsen horse burial site --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Oaktree b! Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the wulfsen horse burial is only present in scientific archaeological publications, therefore almost no information in English language are available in the Internet. I will ask a native English speaker which I met last week end on a Wikipedia photo workshop at Hamburgmuseum. - I'll try to translate some more articles into English in the next days out of the category: de:Kategorie:Archäologisches Museum Hamburg. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I just saw the article you put up, very good! Collaboration at it's best. Thanks! Oaktree b (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks - now I hope someone will be able to translate the article French - Have a nice weekend --Bullenwächter (talk) 15:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you for your nice work on various archaeology-related articles. The pictures are great, too! We could use more of your good work at the DYK section on Wikipedia's MainPage. I have nominated two of your recent articles. You can see the nominations at T:TDYK and at T:TDYK. DYK reviewers may have questions or ask for more footnotes, etc., so please be encouraged to join the discussion there. Please also be encouraged to nominate your upcoming wikiarticles for DYK. Thank you. --PFHLai (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi PFHLai! Thank you that's a great honour. I'll try my best to anser the reviewers questions. --Bullenwächter (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Template for translated pages
You may find Translated page useful. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Andy! thank you for the hint, I have added the template to the tal page of some of the relevant articles. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Duvensee paddle
Hello! Your submission of Duvensee paddle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pumpkin Sky  talk  18:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Duvensee paddle
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - It's now also featured on Portal:Germany. If you have more DYK related to Germany, please feel free to add there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you - It's a great honour for me that the article is mentioned on the main page ;-) --Bullenwächter (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Did you know that you also hit the stats?
 * Whow - cool --Bullenwächter (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Precious
Thank you soo much! --Bullenwächter (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * A year ago, you were the 246th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks again - Ill try to continue my work ..... --Bullenwächter (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Tangendorf disk brooch
Hello, Bullenwächter. Thank you your additions to this article. Can we have more footnotes, please? Thanks in advance. --PFHLai (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello PFHLai! Thank you for your request. The literature quoted in the article is all what has been published yet being of scientific relevance. I have tried to reference all statements to the correspondent sources of information. I am afraid but in my opinion more footnotes would bring no additional value. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added a citation for the first sentence. --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Tangendorf disk brooch
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wijnand van der Sanden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wijnand van der Sanden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wijnand van der Sanden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Slashme (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Forsbrook Pendant
Hi,

I just wrote Forsbrook Pendant and thought it might interest you. Hope you are well; good wishes for 2013. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Mastitis
This is work in progress, see User:Richiez/Drafts. Not sure where I would fit the image in the new structure. Richiez (talk) 11:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello Richiez! I'm not an medic or a veterinary but I think the position in article Mastitis would be OK or in sections regarding mastitis of animals. --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Archaeology of Kosovo
You might enjoy Archaeology of Kosovo, which someone I'm mentoring started today. May be you or one of your friends could kindly translate it into German? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The article won the competition, being judged the best one from the event! Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello! Thanks for your info but I fear my time is too limited for such a project presently. I'll do my best but I can't promise anything. --Bullenwächter (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I thought perhaps you could inform other de.Wikipedia editors who might be interested? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * OK I will ask the relevant instances --Bullenwächter (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Did you see the recent news, that stolen Kosovan artefacts of archaeological interest were recovered in Germany? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Roeland Paardekooper for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roeland Paardekooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Roeland Paardekooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

New Bog Body documentary
Hallo Andi,

I came across this very recent moorleiche documentary that premiered yesterday in the U.S. As I send you this, I am just starting it. It's in English, but I hope you enjoy it.

Tschüss! -- Gourami Watcher  (Gulp) 02:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hallo Nicholas! Wie geht es Dir? Ich habe lange schon nichts mehr von Dir gehört. Thanks for your tip. It sounds interesting and I hope I'll have the opportunity to wacht the film. It is funny, just on Wednesday I have been contacted by Bearkatt Productions from UK that they are also preparing a documentary about north european bog body finds and asking for copyright infos about File:KreepenMan.jpg. From my side the bog archaeology as become a bit quiet as I am working on a new private and very interesting project about very early firearms in the city defece of Hamburg around 1400 AD Bummsbrigade Hamborch ;-) --Bullenwächter (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Aymestrey burial
Hello,

I recently saw the Aymestrey burial in a small museum, so of course I wrote an article, and thought you might like it. I trust you are well, Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Andy! Of course I am well - especially after last night. Thank you for the nice article. --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
  archeological treasures

Thank you for sharing your knowledge in quality articles such as Duvensee paddle and Tangendorf disk brooch, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC) Two years ago, you were the 246th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 246 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Than you Gerda, I appreciate that. Unfortunately my time now is a bit limited so that I'm not able to contribute as much as I want. But I'll try to carry on ... --Bullenwächter (talk) 09:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * That's fine ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Gourami Watcher  (?) 01:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Puttees of Søgårds Mose Man
On the Puttee article, I see you added a photo of a bog body with leg coverings. Are these really puttees? They don't appear to match the description in the article. Could you add some text to connect the photo subject? --Theodore Kloba (talk) 16:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The German word for Puttees is Wadenwickel which matches the type of the Søgårds Mose Man, the English term may have a deviating meaning - I'm not sure if Leg Wraps wourld be a better English term. --Bullenwächter (talk) 07:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I see the hatnote on Wadenwickel says that Wickelgamasche is a better translation for puttee. The leg wrappings on the Søgårds Mose Man are wide cloths, not strips wrapped spirally, so they look more like Leg warmers or Gaiters.  Definitely not Leg wraps since that article is focused on horses. --Theodore Kloba (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you Gerda Arendt. Bullenwächter (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Kartëhl moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kartëhl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UricdivineTalkToMe 19:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks. I will observe the progress of the album release and will add furhter information and refernces once available. Bullenwächter (talk) 09:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Than you so much, Gerda, you are precious too Bullenwächter (talk) 11:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
Your edit to Mëkanïk Dëstruktïẁ Kömmandöh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello. I have translated the story line from the article on deWiki, and I have tried to interprete Pter Thelen's message. Bullenwächter (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kartëhl
Hello, Bullenwächter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kartëhl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kartëhl


Hello, Bullenwächter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kartëhl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)