User talk:Bullsman89

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight  talk   18:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

March 5, 2006
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Monkeyman(talk) 18:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as [removed]. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 04:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Paul Mazzuca, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --otherlleft 03:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Gomper Syndrome
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Gomper Syndrome) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 04:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Paul Mazzuca) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Finngall  talk  05:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * For the record, there were three things that happened to the article, of which I am only responible for one:
 * Placement of the tag--this was done by another user.
 * Placement of the speedy deletion tag--this one was mine.
 * Deletion of the article--this was done by an administrator. I am not an administrator and do not have the power to delete articles myself.  Indeed, I have no more power, rights, privileges, etc., than any other general user, yourself included.


 * It should also be noted that I tagged only one of the three incarnations of the article, each of which was speedily deleted by a different admin, so if you have a complaint, I'm hardly the only one you should be talking to here.


 * I did look at your references, and I did a Google search in addition to this. I found nothing to suppoort the more outlandish claims made in the article, and a "legend in his own field" would certainly merit more than 49 Google hits anyway.  The article appeared to be complete bollocks, so I tagged it as a nonsense article, and the deleting admin apparently agreed.


 * It appears that your contributions to Wikipedia thus far have amounted to little more than the creation of nonsense articles and minor vandalism of existing articles. I don't want to sound like I have a stick up my butt here, but Wikipedia is (mostly) a serious project, and I hope that your future contributions will reflect this.  If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.  Thanks, and take care. -- Finngall   talk  16:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)