User talk:BumbleBeast57445

October 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi - I'm confused by your recent editing. From your userpage, you appear to know what edit warring is, and looking at your recent edit summaries you appear to be admitting to adding fake content to an article. I'm a bit confused about this - on balance, while your edit summaries might leave something to be desired in terms of brevity and clarity, you appear to have been editing constructively. Maybe you just need to take a break from the screen for a while or something, so I've only blocked for 24 hours at the moment, but I'd be interested to hear from you about whether you actually want to contribute constructively here, or whether you're just messing around. If you want to continue here, please put a bit more effort in to collaborate with others, discuss changes when someone reverts you, and don't give the impression that you're vandalising. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  19:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cyhi the Prynce, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Why would you remove a freely licensed image? Just because the image you uploaded was a copyright violation does not mean that you should remove a freely licensed one. Also done here.'' Whpq (talk) 01:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed the freely licenced images on both articles and if I added new ones then it was for a reason it clearly states on each file description which website they belong to and y'all are going to delete them regardless BumbleBeast57445 01:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to be removing the images. You have provided no sensible explanation. -- Whpq (talk) 01:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * oh? how so? BumbleBeast57445 01:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —  Newslinger  talk   02:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I've revoked your access to this talk page for the duration of this block. I strongly recommend that you change your approach if you return to editing when the block expires - further disruption will likely result in an indefinite block. Girth Summit  (blether)  07:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)