User talk:Bumpsy

Re the above, what other third party sources? The references listed is what there is, besides listings at National Defence HQ of the Canadian Forces, of which The CAV do not have access and listings from other web sites. The material at the references list all.

Insofar as no links to this article, yes there is. What more do you want?

______________________________________________________________________________

14 Aug 2008: I have read, been advised, and followed all that was needed for the page. As stated above, primary, reliable sources to this page have been provided.

If this is insufficient, then please expand on the definitions of 'primary source' and 'reliable source'.

CJ (aka Bumpsy) mailto:corporate@thecav.ca[corporate@thecav.ca

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:VVi ad2.gif
Thanks for uploading File:VVi ad2.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:24, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Bumpsy/VeteranVoice.info has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VeteranVoice.info, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   15:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)


 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tobyc75 (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

While there are citations in the article. None of them are reliable, 3rd-party citations that specifically mention the organization and indicate how it is notable. The citations simply establish that the Canadian military organizations exist and that some of the veterans organizations have linked to it.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VeteranVoice.info
You asked about what was wanted on the references. References are needed to establish whether VeteranVoice.info meets Wikipedia's notability standards. For something to be notable, it has to have multiple, third-party, non-trivial articles or websites that discuss the organization. Take a look the the specific notability standards.

ref 1 is to VeteranVoice's own website, so it's not a third-party website ref 2 proves that the RCMP exists, but I can't find any references to VeteranVoice.info ref 3 proves that Canadian forces exist, but I can't find any references to VeteranVoice.info ref 4 proves that Veterans Affairs Canada exist, but I can't find any references to VeteranVoice.info ref 5 just mentions Canadian Copyright laws, no specific part of Canadian Copyright laws and doesn't mention VeteranVoice.info ref 6 comes from VeteranVoice's own website, so it's not a third-party website ref 7 the CAV website contains a link to VeteranVoice's own website, along with numerous others. If it specifically mentions VV and clearly discusses how the two organizations interact, then it might help establish notability. Please provide a link to the specific section in the CAV website ref 8 proves that PPCLI exists, but I can't even find any links to the VV website or how the two organizations work together.

Only Ref 7 and 8 have a slight chance to establish notability. Let me know if you have any further questions. Tobyc75 (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:VVi ad2.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VVi ad2.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

__________________________________________________________________ I omitted to complete some of the fields when I uploaded the image. It was an error on my part.

The image is not copyright. It was developed by myself and is free for anyone to use.

If this explanation is insufficient to aloow the upload and use of the image, please advise how to correct. I can simply delete the image and re-upload if you wish.

Bumpsy [mailto:publisher@veteranvoice.info publisher@veteranvoice.info]

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 00:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VeteranVoice.info logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:VeteranVoice.info logo.gif, which you've sourced to http://veteranvoice.info. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VeteranVoice.info Title.gif
Thanks for uploading File:VeteranVoice.info Title.gif, which you've sourced to http://www.veteranvoice.info/webpages/9volunteer_jvsp_vetaid_dbsearch.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

veteranvoice.info
I give up! Everything is owned by me. I do not have the time to mess about over such a ridiculous bureaucratic process to just post an article. I have to do that with the federal gov't every day, but I am not spending the hours to verify everything is owned by myself.

It's a shame that Wikepedia has created more rules and regulations then are necessary. I thought Wikipedia may have had a future. With the new rules, like some many others are telling me, it is about to become just a fad that will fade. Shame!

CJ (aka Bumpsy) publisher@veteranvoice.info

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VeteranVoice.info, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SQL Server (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Veteranvoice.info logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Veteranvoice.info logo.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:VeteranVoice.info


A tag has been placed on Draft:VeteranVoice.info requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.veteranvoice.info/vvi/WebPages/1home.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)