User talk:BunBuns13

August 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cabbage Patch Kids. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 11:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cabbage Patch Kids, you may be blocked from editing. Discuss this material on the article's talk page or leave it alone Meters (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I did not make an edit to any Cabbage patch articles. BunBuns13 (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Susan Collins, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Susan Collins. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lisa Murkowski, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Boebert. Nightmare Rarity Enter the palace 00:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't believe I should be banned, as it's very clear that right wing politicians are labeled as "alt or far" right when there is NO reason for then to be listed as such. When you do not do the same to the left wing politicians. They are NEVER labeled as "alt" or "far" left. I will stop editing that but I want to get my point across that this is EXTREMELY BIASED and there for is NOT " the encyclopedia" that you state this is supposed to be. If you're going to do it, at least be fair in what your allowing. Ilhan Omar? Far Left? Alexandria Ocasio Cortez? Far Left? Yes and yes. Yet it's not on there! Yet MTG and Lauren Boebert are labeled as "far right" and "alt right"??? Right? If you are going to label an ENTIRE group as such, you're fooling yourself if you think you're not being left wing bias. Once this happens THEN you are being fair and being honest. Until then, Wikipedia is nothing more than YET ANOTHER left wing bias. Explain that and I'll go away. You are included in the other sites who completely have a goal to DIVIDE. Anyone who labels themselves as a Democrat gets PRAISED on here. The Republicans are "fair game" for you to attack and degrade. BIAS ALL OVER the place. Change it to be fair or you just prove me correct. Btw "Far right & "Alt right" ARE opinions, YET they get to stay. I label someone Far-Left and I get banned. People see what's going on and I have fwd this all in screenshots to the media and the Reps and Senators themselves. Thanks. And Happy Holidays. BunBuns13 (talk) 03:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * With the lack of a civil and collaborative attitude you are displaying, it's clear you are only here with an agenda to push right wing talking points and views. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. If you have sources that describe AOC or Bernie Sanders as far left, you may offer them in a civil, collaborative discussion with other editors to achieve a consensus. Wikipedia does not claim to be unbiased, as everyone has biases, nor does it claim to be the truth, see WP:TRUTH. The only claim made is that the information presented can be verified. Wikipedia presents sources to readers so they can evaluate them and judge them for themselves, as you seem have done. If you are interested in being civil and collaborative, please request unblock as instructed. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * We don't "praise Democrats", and there are many Republican/conservative editors here who civilly and collaboratively pariticpate here. I don't care what your views are, it's about your attitude.  Change it, and you would be welcome. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)