User talk:Bundaberger

DYK nomination of Florence v. Shurtleff
Hello! Your submission of Florence v. Shurtleff at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Bundaberger, it's been two weeks since you were notified above, and no action has been taken to address the issues raised at your DYK nomination. This is a last call for you to respond by fixing the article and posting to the nomination template. As it stands, the article cannot run at DYK unless you take action right away. I hope we hear from you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lixxx235 -- Lixxx235 (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC
The article Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lixxx235 -- Lixxx235 (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)