User talk:BunnyDust/Herbert Smith

This profile is better than either of the two existing ones. Good work. --Yobabyyo (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I see that the old herbert smith page is back. If you have kept a copy of '3rd way' article, please can you replace the Herbert Smith brochure with it?

Many thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.188.153 (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

By '3rd way' do you mean the article we produced on this page? If so, I've already restored it. Thanks.BunnyDust (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your note about editing and how it should be done. I was not trying to re-balance the discussion, but I did find myself getting lost so tried to simplfy it.

Perhaps adding different headings would help?

I'm also concerned on 2 other points:

1. The person from Herbert smith who wrote the profile may believe that this discussion is overly negative to Herbert smith. I do not believe that to be the case but feel he/she should be given the opportunity to explain and have their views taken into consideration. The point of wikipedia is to have an objective view. Having said that - we all know that it us subjective and certainly not diffinitive. Good, though

2. The individual who keeps substituting the more balanced version with the brochure talk should perhaps be barred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.188.153 (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, it was a bit confusing I must admit! In response to your points: 1. the person who keeps reverting the profile can respond to any discussions and make any points they wish; the text of the article must be reached by consensus and everyone's views will be considered. In fact I encourage whoever it is to join in the discussion rather than merely reverting the page in an unproductive way as they are currently. (The person who wrote the original profile (apparently not the overly-promotional edits to it) is currently involved in the discussions; see Talk:Herbert_Smith). 2. I agree. I have been advised by an admin that if the reverts continue for much longer the page will be semi-protected (so that only auto-confirmed registered users can edit it) and the IP address itself might be blocked. BunnyDust (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)