User talk:Bunt56

March 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bunt (community). PageImp (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Kulala
People must meet wp:notability (people) to be included on lists. They almost always should have their own article or have extremely good references. One's own website, biography, or company is not sufficient. Jim1138 (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M.K.Seetharam Kulal


The article M.K.Seetharam Kulal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kulala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Sanctions
- Sitush (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Citing
Hi, I think you may be adding citations at Kulala without actually checking them. I have just had to remove two because they do not say what you think they say. I've left the Alagodi one in there for now but it is meaningless and will have to be fixed. - Sitush (talk) 12:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tulu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, sorry it was a mistake now have changed it thankyou for the information Bunt56 (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Mangalore is a Featured Article, and not a Tulu propaganda magazine
Some of your edits in Mangalore don't include citations. There is no proper formatting as well. Remember that Mangalore is a Featured Article and not a Tulu propaganda magazine. 223.186.36.9 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Please protect the Mangalore article from Vandalism
I request you to protect the Mangalore article from Vandalism. Please be very careful while editing the Mangalore article. Please stop adding biased and promotional content into the Mangalore article. No Administrator is protecting this article and it will be delisted (removed) from the list of Featured Articles. Check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Mangalore 223.186.205.129 (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Linguisticgeek. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bunt (community) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Linguisticgeek (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Linguisticgeek (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Note
--Neil N  talk to me 19:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Bunt (community)
Please explain how the material you removed is unsourced. --Neil N  talk to me 14:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note that if no acceptable explanation is given then you will be looking at a topic ban. --Neil N  talk to me 14:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * there is no acceptable explanation. The stuff was reliably sourced, as it also was at Kulala. Bunt56 has been doing this sort of thing for a while now on articles where we know sockfarms have been operating. - Sitush (talk) 14:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bunt (community). Sitush (talk) 16:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

To enforce community authorised sanctions, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard). --Neil N  talk to me</i> 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)