User talk:BunyaBunyanut

August 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Polyunsaturated fatty acid, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Frontiers journals are suspected of predatory publishing and do not meet the standards of WP:MEDRS, which you should read before choosing further sources for medical - especially anti-disease content. See WP:CITEWATCH.'' Zefr (talk) 01:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Polyunsaturated fatty acid, you may be blocked from editing. ''The source does not comply with WP:MEDRS. Do not edit war, WP:WAR.'' Zefr (talk) 02:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * What was wrong with the source? I can add several more if that helps. Im not trying to be painful just want to learn the right way this is my first edit and there is lots of evidence on PUFA and cancer BunyaBunyanut (talk) 03:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There is only preliminary research and no good clinical evidence for an association of PUFA with cancer, and plenty of evidence for no association. There is no clinical guideline or national regulatory agency that states of danger for consuming PUFA to increase the risk of cancer. That is why we adhere to WP:MEDRS. The Frontiers journal you are trying to use is unreliable as possibly/likely a predatory publisher. We do not use Frontiers journals for medical content. Zefr (talk) 03:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What about this one? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-020-0761-6 Also the parts in the article that talk about CVD and cognition benefits of PUFA are pretty flimsy I looked at all the Cochrane reviews for PUFA and Fish oils and the evidence is very weak BunyaBunyanut (talk) 04:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There is no strong evidence for a PUFA-cancer association or EFSA, FDA and other national bodies would have consumer warnings posted. In the Nature review, there is too much uncertainty, with the authors stating in the Discussion: "doses of total PUFA were highly variable (from 0.8% of energy to almost 38% of energy from total PUFA in trials providing cancer diagnosis data), but the small number of trials made subgrouping by dose uninformative." Think of what the general Wikipedia user would take from such a conclusion - there isn't much different language to add to what is already in the Cancer section. Dietary studies have such poor, variable design and uncontrolled factors that clear results are unlikely. Zefr (talk) 04:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)