User talk:Burberry southsea

June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Verbal  chat  15:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note this applies to any article, such as Ian Stevenson. Verbal   chat  12:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Notification
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Blippy. Thank you.. KillerChihuahua?!? 12:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Burberry southsea. It seems some people think we're the same person.  You don't happen to be me do you?  Perhaps a split reincarnation ;-)  Anyway, I'm fairly new (too?) and I'm not trying to tell you how to suck eggs, but I think I've discovered that it's better to discuss edits in the talk section first rather than getting into 'edit tennis'.  These guys are pretty quick to revert everything and you end up having to have the discussion anyway, so I'm going to just have the discussion first and avoid all the 3RR hassles.


 * Oh, and if you are me, have we got any extra cash lying around I can use?? Cheers, Blippy (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Verbal  chat  10:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Reincarnation research
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Reincarnation research. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Reincarnation research. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)