User talk:Burham/Archive 12

Talkback
Mediran talk to me! 01:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ckatz chatspy  10:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Request for comments
Please use a wp:request for comments to initiate discussion regarding your changes. You want the changes, you do the work. You are being reverted by multiple editors. See wp:concensus; it's how Wikipedia works. Jim1138 (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes... I want to see evidence, not argue. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I need not ask for comments to make changes and any work around. I make the change you disregard say me why? This is what free edited encyclopedia is. For that I need not give you cite it is obvious. I do not care how many editors revert me until they have no logical reason to do so. wp:concensus; say nothing I need ask anybody to make the changes – show me the line. I think you misleading me or make mockery – it is BAD ATTITUDE. Be serious and answer specifically for sections – somewhere  on a page  and you think it is argument. Be serious. --Burham (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You were invited to make the comments, and you declined. I and others will continue to undo your edits. No consensus. Please stop badgering me on my talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

What invitation, to what comments? I am lost. Who and what edits will revert? Who bothering whome? You revert my edits, have no argues only YOU HAVE no CONSENSUS and no exact what rules you a talking about. No I am bothering you? Just do not play on Wikipedia, no body will bother you.--Burham (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * See above: wp:request for comments. Use that. Please keep the topic on improving Wikipedia. See No personal attacks. Please follow Wikipedia policy on adding content to articles. See the Welcome section above. Please keep the conversation on this page. I will watch your page. Any further comments on my talk page by you will be deleted without reading. Do feel free to use template:talkback on my page. Jim1138 (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I am happy you little bit recover. I am sorry I add somthing to the weight of live. Unfortunately nobody promissed us to be HAPPY EDITOR evry day :) Also I will continue our conversation as you wish HERE, juzt to avoid make you upset. Obviously you can choose disregard other comments on you favourable page (actualy it is not a personal sensustricte - rules are global for the TALK page), but lack of answer is ANASWER too. I think next week we can be good friends, maybe only a time is needed to cool down and cooperate.--Burham (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

OH! Yes in the "Bureaucracy" lead what you were removing was not my comment - it was CITATION from a source--Burham (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * It was not a verifiable source. You did not state where you got it from. See wp:cite. Also, if it was a direct copy/paste from another source, it may be at issue with WP:CV. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bureaucracy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)