User talk:Burning Desire

Welcome
Hello, Burning Desire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danilo Mariotti
A tag has been placed on Danilo Mariotti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Minima c  ( talk ) 13:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danilo Mariotti


The article Danilo Mariotti has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 11:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roberto Mariotti


The article Roberto Mariotti has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

You must add a reference before you remove the template
Please do not remove BLPPROD templates until there is at least one reference from a reliable source in the article. Thank you.The-Pope (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roberto Mariotti, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 01:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roberto Mariotti, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. The-Pope (talk) 13:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

How clear must I be
Your articles will be deleted unless you can verify the information in them from reliable sources. You should also read the conflict of interest policy, you should not be creating articles about yourself. I know nothing about Italian football, so I have asked at the WikiProject page for other people's opinions. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Italy_task_force.The-Pope (talk) 15:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A.S.D. SVS Roma


A tag has been placed on A.S.D. SVS Roma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Luxic (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Mariotti
Provo a spiegartelo in italiano. Qui su Wikipedia inglese, il requisito perché un calciatore sia considerato idoneo all'inclusione è l'aver partecipato a competizioni pienamente professionistiche (vedi WP:NSPORTS). Quindi, il caso di Danilo Mariotti e della sua squadra è facile: NON possono essere inclusi, in quanto partecipano ad un campionato dilettantistico giovanile. Per quanto riguarda Roberto Mariotti, invece, l'aver giocato in C2 potrebbe essere sufficiente. Tuttavia, devi trovare delle fonti attendibili che dimostrino che ha effettivamente collezionato almeno una presenza. Inoltre, le linee guida di notabilità generale impongono che ci sia una copertura significativa del soggetto da parte di fonti terze. Spero di essere stato chiaro. Se hai altre domande, chiedi pure. Ciao! Luxic (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Infatti è proprio quello il problema. Credo che in questo caso sia virtualmente impossibile trovare fonti attendibili sufficienti per gli standard di WP:GNG. Sarebbe già un'impresa ardua riuscire ad avere anche solo i tabellini dell'epoca (magari cercando vecchi numeri di giornali locali in qualche emeroteca polverosa) ed anche riuscendoci, a quel punto sarebbero solo un nome in una lista che serve a poco o nulla. Insomma, pur con tutto il rispetto per tuo padre, temo non ci sia proprio nulla da fare. Mi spiace... Luxic (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)