User talk:Burnside1980

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Neil Budworth may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --  Gary Kirk  (talk) 10:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Chris Weale
Unfortunatly you copied that from here so it violates copyright and had to be deleted. You must write articles in your own words. Please read Copyrights. Thanks. I have also deleted the following for the same copyright problem Steven Collis, Nathan Jones (footballer), Colin Miles, Terry Skiverton, Adam Lockwood, Ross Turnbull, Lee Hopkins, Solomon Haumono, Anton du Beke, Tim Hartley, Matt Gafa, Luke Dorn, Nick Bradley-Qalilawa and Izabela Hannah. Please do not create any mmore. Thanks CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Sheffield Wednesday
Thank you for experimenting with the page Sheffield Wednesday F.C. on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

It is perfectly acceptable for there to be red links on pages on Wikipedia. This indicates that an article that is of interest has not yet been written and encourages further contribution rather than simply identifying a dead link. The red links have therefore been restored to the article. Dan1980 22:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Removing redlinks
Why are you dewikifying seemingly every football article on Wikipedia? Mark272 20:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Millwall F.C. redlinks
Please stop dewikifying redlinks. Thank you. Lion King 13:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Ross Turnbull
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Ross Turnbull article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!

and this Matthew hk 14:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Football stubs
Please follow the above guidelines when creating articles - which shouldn't read like entries in the Beano Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Steven Schumacher
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Steven Schumacher, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.stellargroup.co.uk/football.php?footballid=205. As a copyright violation, Steven Schumacher appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Steven Schumacher has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Steven Schumacher. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Steven Schumacher, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 13:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

15 minute block
I have blocked you for 15 minutes so you read the guidelines so that you can create acceptable articles. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Please create real articles and not text dumps. See for instance my edit to Mark Bower for how an article should look like. Punkmorten 11:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

copyvios
Similarly, your articles on Martin Cranie, Nathan Dyer, and Nicky Adams have been flagged as copyvios. Mr Stephen 13:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

... and I have reverted your contributions to Lionel Ainsworth and Michael Jackson (footballer) for the same reason. Mr Stephen 13:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing messages
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Mr Stephen 11:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Mr Stephen 12:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Jimmy Mullen
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jimmy Mullen, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.claretsmad.co.uk/news/loadsngl.asp?cid=ED95&id=122716. As a copyright violation, Jimmy Mullen appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jimmy Mullen has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Jimmy Mullen. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Jimmy Mullen, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 14:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Brian Stock
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Brian Stock, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.football.co.uk/preston/players/brian_stock_40155.shtml. As a copyright violation, Brian Stock appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Brian Stock has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Brian Stock. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Brian Stock, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 15:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

More copyvios
I have reverted text that you have copied from other sites in the articles Matty Kay, Jamie Burns, Wes Hoolahan. Mr Stephen 15:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

... likewise the articles James Coutts (footballer), Daryl Taylor, Tareq Khalil, Brett Pitman, and Curtis Allen. Please stop. Mr Stephen 15:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Brett Pitman
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brett Pitman without permission from the copyright holder. See Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome.

Please stop. The text you added to Brett Pitman is from www.bournemouth.vitalfootball.co.uk/sitepage.asp?a=23082, and at the foot of that page it states "All content copyright Vital Network Ltd, not to be reproduced without explicit permission". Mr Stephen 08:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Redlinks
Hello Burnside,

I see you've been removing a lot of redlinks recently. Please don't do that. Redlinks are not errors &mdash; they are an important feature of Wikipedia, showing where articles need to be written. And when a new article is written, it allows all the related articles to link to it immediately. Basically, all topics which might have an article in the future should have a redlink.

Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 17:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Mr Stephen 19:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Examples of your cutting and pasting
Mohammed Sheikh (I have stripped out your C&P), Ismail Dawood  (I have stripped out your C&P), Colin Povey  (I have marked the marked whole article as copyvio). Mr Stephen 19:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been temporaraily blocked from editing Wikipedia because your repeated copy and pastes after numerous warnings can be construed as vandalism. You are welcome to make constructiv eedits if you return when your block expires in 48hrs, but repeated violations will result in longer blocks. The JPS talk to me  10:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

unblock
yes i have understood the better ways of writing articles without copying i have looked at other pages and websites they have put as links and looked at easier ways of putting down all information thankyou.

Yet To Be Unblocked
I was banned until 10 55 august 11th but have not been unblocked.
 * That's because you tried at 10:38. It's now 11:00 and you should be OK. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok thankyou the times are bit slow i still seem to be blocked.

Still Blocked
Hello my user name has been unblocked but my i.p. address is still blocked address is 82.46.147.18 it was blocked by autoblock..

(CCed from the Unblock mailing list)

It looks like our autoblocker blocked your IP address. The autoblocker blocks the underlying IP of a blocked user, but the autoblocker should have stopped blocking you after your original 48 hour block expired. Since you still experienced the block, I unblocked what appeared to be your IP address (I don't know for sure because our logs hide IP addresses for IP purposes). If you are still experiencing the block, please let us know.

Thank you for contacting the Unblock list,

DP (Deathphoenix ʕ 12:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC))

Manual of style
You are strongly encouraged to consider following the Wikipedia Manual of Style, since many of your edits are departing from the customary guidelines in ways that other editors report as being very disagreeable. Wikipedia does not require writers to follow all or any of these rules, but their efforts will be more appreciated when they do so. Casper2k3 15:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above recommendation is seconded. Kukini 15:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Editing Concerns

 * 1) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please do not delete wikify requests. Instead, please learn how to edit within our manual of style. Kukini 15:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Deleting pages
There are several ways of deleting content in Wikipedia, but simply replacing the copy with "NEEDS DELETING" and renaming the article "speedy deletion" is not one of them. The process to be followed when two separate pages describe the same subject (eg Dave Hibbert & David Hibbert) is a "merge", see WP:MM. Regards Mr Stephen 17:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Removing redlinks - please don't!
As a number of other people have said above, please do not remove redlinks from articles. Thank you. Loganberry (Talk) 01:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Categories
Hi remember to categorize e.g Category:Welsh footballers. Go through your articles and add this. Otherwise your articles will be lost in the index. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 10:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see categories for Chris Gunter. you can copy these where relevant. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 10:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Ryan Laight
A tag has been placed on Ryan Laight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Springnuts 19:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Andreas Arestidou
A "" template has been added to the article Andreas Arestidou, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Obina 20:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Warren Beattie
A template has been added to the article Warren Beattie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. ArtVandelay13 17:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Scott McCoubrey
A template has been added to the article Scott McCoubrey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. ArtVandelay13 18:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Ashley Parillon
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Ashley Parillon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Curtis Aspden
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Curtis Aspden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Curtis Aspden.

Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986). robwingfield «T•C» 19:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986)
I have nominated Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dale Roberts (footballer born 1986). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. robwingfield «T•C» 19:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Michael Woods (footballer)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Michael Woods (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Armstrong (Northern Irish footballer)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Armstrong (Northern Irish footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Allison
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott Allison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bettia  (rawr CRUSH!)  11:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Michael Johnston (footballer)
I have nominated Michael Johnston (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Michael Johnston (footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steve-Ho (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Burnside1980! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 15 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Philippe Saint-André -
 * 2) Matt Wait -
 * 3) Nelson Acosta -
 * 4) Marian Ivan -
 * 5) Tareq Khalil -
 * 6) Terry Kiely -
 * 7) Ben France -
 * 8) Michael Carew -
 * 9) Colin Povey -
 * 10) Deon Hemmings -

11. Marios Kaperonis 12. Dimitar Stilianov 13. Paul Ellender 14. John van den Brom 15. Jonathan Barnett

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tareq Khalil


The article Tareq Khalil has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE by never having played at a fully-professional level, not enough media coverage to pass WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Struway2 (talk) 13:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Balázs Borbély
I have nominated Balázs Borbély, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Balázs Borbély. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Wait


The article Matt Wait has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Apparently non-notable actor, some passing mention in reviews, no significant coverage that I can find.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nelson Acosta


The article Nelson Acosta has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 09:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Curtis Allen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curtis Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Curtis Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Gregg Coombes


The article Gregg Coombes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league, his single appearance for Oxford having been in the Conference not League Two, as per the Soccerbase link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosack (talk) 06:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jay Pina


The article Jay Pina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 10:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

"Runners Up" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Runners Up. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Laatekwei Hammond for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laatekwei Hammond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laatekwei Hammond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2 . O . Boxing 12:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)