User talk:Burrild

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reactor1967
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reactor1967
Hello Burrild,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reactor1967 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  19:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Hello, Burrild. You have new messages at Ishdarian's talk page. You can [ remove this notice] at any time.  Ish dar  ian  20:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Reactor1967
Hi Burrild, I've deleted the article Reactor1967, as well as your sandbox. This page is not factual, and appears to be a hoax. It isn't appropriate to include on Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is not a free webhost. There are other websites that do provide free hosting for your own content, including fictional content that you may want to try out. Please don't add this information back to Wikipedia though, as it does not fit in with the mission of this site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Prodego talk  20:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

And it appears again my sources were not read because there was a news paper article as well as my other sources from news outlets. Also, in the live chat which I have a copy of you guys said you would leave my sandbox along. It appears you guys are lieing to me and you may see our chat logs and communications is a letter to the editor in a very well known public news paper with lots of readers. And, else where. I dont like being lied to. You guys said you would leave my sandbox along. Please respond. burrild

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... disco spinster   talk  22:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)