User talk:Burtmaclin

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Denver Broncos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Creation7689 (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Denver Broncos, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Denver Broncos was changed by Burtmaclin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945183 on 2011-10-31T19:07:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to WikiLeaks.   Wikipelli Talk   19:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Tim "Jesus" Teblow


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Tim "Jesus" Teblow. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Tim Tebow. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tim Tebow - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC) This blocked user ( [ block log] | [ active blocks] | autoblocks | [ unblock] | contribs | deleted contribs | [ abuse log] ) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

"I was not trying to vandalize but i understand why you could think that I was. By the way, Materialscientist, I noticed that on your page, you didn't list what college you achieved your phd at. A little fishy in my opinion." "Obvious troll; talk page access revoked so you don't waste any more of our time. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)"
 * Request reason
 * Revoke reason


 * Janet Snakehole will not be impressed. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)