User talk:Bus68

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Hair Talk 01:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Lang concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Lang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Lang


Hello Bus68. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jim Lang".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Not Blocked

 * I can't see anything in your block log to say you are blocked. You'll have to post the message you are getting. BTW, I'm afraid that you don't constitute a verifiable source - we need to have sources that are published so that other people in other places can read them. What you see (or what I see, for that matter) is not visible to someone else on the other side of the world. Eye witness accounts in courts of law are acceptable in courts of law, but we require published sources - please see WP:V. Seeing it counts as 'original research' WP:OR. Peridon (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Automatic message if I click "edit" on any page other than my talk page:

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia.

You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 67.218.18.234 has been blocked (disabled) by Cyphoidbomb for the following reason(s): Disruptive editing - Unsourced date changes, talk page comment refactoring and removal, addition of incoherent and dubious prose. Indistinguishable from vandalism. WP:CIR

This block has been set to expire: 18:16, 4 March 2017.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Username policy ·  Appealing blocks: policy and guide If the block notice is unclear, or it does not appear to relate to your actions, please ask for assistance as described at Help:I have been blocked. Bus68 (talk) 01:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

, you blocked the IP address in question but did so without restricting it to anon-only. I'm at a bit of a loss here. It initially appears to be two separate users on the same IP address, which is certainly plausible. The IP address may certainly have been reassigned since it was blocked. Any objection to me changing the block on the IP address to anon-only? --Yamla (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the note. No objection, based on this user's edits. I do, however, feel that there is probably one editor responsible for most of the disruption from IP 67.218.18.234. Beano and Noddy are recurring areas of interest for the IP over the span of a few years. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cyphoidbomb. I agree, likely one editor on that IP address. I've changed the block to be anon-only. --Yamla (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)