User talk:Busboy

Life details pending...

Image copyright problem with Image:Hispanic_Children.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hispanic_Children.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:913 composite sketch 1280.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:913 composite sketch 1280.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Flying Canuck 00:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:913 Composite Sketch 1280.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:913 Composite Sketch 1280.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cholmes75 21:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

American History X
Why did you remove the reference to this film's infamous prison rape scene? I have reverted your changes. FCYTravis 23:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Missing
No problem. Interesting article, it was fun to proof! --Rob T 13:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

just one question, how did u find my article?Busboy 04:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Fred Phelps
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Fred Phelps. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chuchunezumi 13:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Akatsuki members
I just wanted to tell you that you are coming across a bit threatening on the Akatsuki page, and it might come off negatively to others. I mean, I understand and agree with what you're saying, but it could be done with a gentler touch, and it might start the anons whining at you.

On a side note, how did you get diagnosed with Aspergers? Because looking at it, it appears very similar to what I have, so I'd like to look into having someone confirm/deny it, but I'm not sure who I would need to talk to. Gracias!KrytenKoro 17:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto, GAC
As I said before, it won't pass a review. The references are in a poor format, there's no development or conception section, no major themes section, and the reception section is pitiful. See Madlax and Excel Saga for FA articles of this type, and Bleach (manga) for a GA article of this type. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 23:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

And like I said before, it is thorough, factual and to-the-point. I don't know what you mean by conception, as when I recommended a conception section, it was blatantly ignored, and as for major themes, those were once added, but were quickly labeled not NPOV, and deleted accordingly. The reception is pretty accurate, and not "pitiful", as there is just not much to say without being fluff. Like I said, It deserves a promotion. Busboy 23:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missing-zack.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Missing-zack.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Popular 1975 hit single by queen
A tag has been placed on Popular 1975 hit single by queen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1975 hit single by queen
A tag has been placed on 1975 hit single by queen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Evan Seeds ( talk )( contrib. ) 05:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brohemian Rhapsody
A tag has been placed on Brohemian Rhapsody requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Busboy, in case you didn't know, you can start articles in your own sandbox. That gives you a chance to work on the article and build the content up, so when you move it into mainspace it doesn't get a speedy deletion tag. The link to your sandbox is User:Busboy/Sandbox. Hope that helps! Somno (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Naruto GAN
See comments here. In short, nominating an article you've never worked on before to WP:GAN, WP:FAC, or any nomination process really without having ever worked on it is plain rude. It's disrespectful to the editors who commonly work on the article, and especially when they know the article is not up to par. I'd recommend you withdraw your nomination. You are more than welcome to aid in bringing the article up to par, but coming in and doing a drive-by nomination is definitely not the proper course to take. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 06:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind. As you didn't transclude the nomination at WP:GAN, I simply removed the notice from Talk:Naruto Uzumaki. Again, drive-by nominations are simply rude. This may have not been your intention, and you are acting in good faith, but please note that drive-by nominations are not acceptable. At the very least, it is a courtesy to those that edit the page often to alert them before you nominate the article in order to acquire their input as to whether they think the article is ready for a run at GA status. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 06:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Continue discussion here. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 23:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Missing (video game)


The article Missing (video game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * long unreferenced educational video game with no claim to WP:Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Hispanicman.JPEG


The file File:Hispanicman.JPEG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)