User talk:BushBandarSting

9/11
I've reverted your additions to Responsibility for the September 11 attacks because they appear to report unconfirmed speculation as fact. I take your additions in good faith, but at the least the reports should be discussed in their appropriate context, and not presented as verified truth.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

BushBandarSting, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Recent edits to Rob Ford
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! BsBsBs (talk) 07:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BethNaught. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Scottish independence referendum, 2014 seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 07:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Scottish independence referendum, 2014. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously, as you did at Scottish independence referendum, 2014. BethNaught (talk) 07:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The referendum was on Scottish Independence. If it had been a referendum on British unity, then I, as as British citizen, would have been entitled to vote, wouldn't I?  Please stop moving the article.    D b f i r s   07:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

British unity referendum, 2014 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect British unity referendum, 2014. Since you had some involvement with the British unity referendum, 2014 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for disruptive editing - persistent page moves without consensus and despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

WP:AN
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You can reply here since you are currently blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)