User talk:BusinessSense20000

Welcome!

 * }

Dolson principle
I've deleted your additions of the Dolson principle stuff again. Wikipedia doesn't publish original research. That is, it's not a place for people to publish their own theories, neologisms, etc. Instead, it relies on reliable sources. If you can find instances of third parties using this so-called "Dolson principle", then it would make sense to talk about its applicability to the two articles you'd like it added to. But the author's self-published book isn't a reliable source. Esrever (klaT) 16:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, if you'd like to make a case for including the material, certainly feel free to use the talk pages of the various articles: Talk:The Dilbert principle and Talk:Peter Principle. Esrever (klaT) 16:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've started a discussion about the inclusion of this material on Talk:Peter Principle. Please feel free to weigh in. Esrever (klaT) 18:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Rule zero
Hello, BusinessSense20000,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Rule zero should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Rule zero.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)