User talk:Business Facilitator

Disambiguation pages
If you would like to contribute to disambiguation pages, please read the style guide for those pages at MOS:DAB. Entries should not end in full stops. Thank you.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 17:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Business Facilitator. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Qnet, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

No Conflict of Interest.
The changes I've made on the page Qnet are from the trusted source i.e. the Company's official website. www.qnet.net > About Qnet.

Its better to educate yourself and verify the facts yourself. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

There is no Conflict of Interest. I'm doing some research about Qnet and I found it totally different from Co. Official website and what's available on Wikipedia. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Why did you make 10 edits to disambiguation pages before trying to edit the Qnet article? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

If its an exact copy from co. Official website, then i believe that it must be more easy to get it corrected. People are looking for right information so provide it right. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Star  Mississippi  15:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (uninvolved non-admin comment) I will just say that you copied and pasted the brands own website, wikipedia isn't interested in what any company wants to say about itself only in what independent, reliable sources say about it. Further copying and pasting the company website is a copyright violation which is against not only Wikipedia policy but also the law. Also your statement that you have nothing to do with the company is contradicted by your next sentence when you say you were assigned a due diligence assignment on this company. Both cannot be simultaneously true, if the latter than you have a WP:COI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. If you are from a chartered accountancy background, and if you were working on a due diligence assignment, then you understand the concepts of independence and verification with third parties. A public accountant on an attest engagement will confirm the balance of a bank account or loan with the bank or lender, rather than go on the client's assertion. The same concept applies here: Wikipedia articles do not repeat what the subjects say about themselves; we prefer the articles to be based on information from independent third parties with a track record of reliability, such as newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed journals, and edited and fact-checked books.
 * Any speculation on how your due diligence assignments would be affected by attempting to conceal third-party information that was found in the Wikipedia article is beyond the scope of on-Wiki activities. However, it is fair to say that if you were working on a due diligence assignment, then even if you were not engaged by the subject, you were engaged by a party that has an interest in the subject, so you have a conflict of interest by association. If you were editing the article on the clock, you would also need to make the required paid editing disclosures.
 * Finally, to clarify what Lavalizard101 said above: copying and pasting the company website is a copyright violation. Wikipedia policy forbids copyright-infringing edits to avoid any legal exposure to Wikipedia from the infringement. (Wikipedia allows non-free content under limited circumstances and with specific requirements; many of the requirements mirror US requirements for fair use.) —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)