User talk:Busman360

How do you know their won't be any redundancies when Upton Park closes? And why do we need to know the a Enviro was involved in a accident? C.bonnick (talk) 08:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

How do you know their won't be any redundancies when Upton Park closes? And why do we need to know the a Enviro was involved in a accident?
I know there wont be any redundancies once Upton Park garage closes because it officialy says this on the new Stagecoach London Website. Here is a link:http://www.stagecoachbus.com/Upton%20Park%20Closure.aspx About the enviro story and the accident. The reason i put this post on here is simply because it was a major head on collision that this bus was involved in and i feel people need to know this, especially if they are bus enthusiasts. I have seen posts on this page before that talk about a bus belonging to the stagecoach fleet being involved in an accident, so please stop delting my posts. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit and i would appreciate it if i could have my say to on this page. Thankyou. Busman360 (talk) 09:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok but I just feel like considering that this is Encyclopedia is just doesn't need such information that's all. C.bonnick (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me but if you get you info from another please say so like this: C.bonnick (talk) 09:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

There is no evidence that the 103 and 175 will only get partially new enviro 400s. Im going by the proper Stagecoach London website as an reliable source. I know some websites are suggesting differently but i would rather go by a reliable source. Everything i put on wikipedia, i say where i got it from and its always a reliable source, so i dont understand what the obsession is with changing it all the time, when its only slightly different anyway. I might just come off wiki all together as its pointless if you cant edit it yourself before its removed or altered within 5 seconds, even if the infos correct.

Because it says on http://www.lots.org.uk/ (which is a very reliable site) says that routes 103 and 175 was awarded with existing and new buses and that means that they will partially get new Enviro400s. C.bonnick (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

i know that website, and yes it is very reliable but wouldnt you go by a website which you can be sure is absolutely correct, considering that they are the bus company? Obviously if Stagecoach have made a mistake on their website then they will change it in good time, but i think its unlikely, and until then wouldnt it be better to follow the information from the official stagecoach website? Im not trying to cause an argument or anything, im just providing information for an encyclopedia. Busman360 (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I just go to a site that has reliable information it whether it's Stagecoach or Lots. C.bonnick (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok i havent deleted anything that you have put on here now because i cant be bothered, but i will ask if you could not delete anymore of my info on here either because its just all getting a bit silly. Thanks Busman360 (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Any why not if I see something that's not really I'll just remove it. C.bonnick (talk) 00:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Arriva London. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 23:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you please stop putting brackets around the buses being introduced to routes 175 and 103 please? Because it doesn't need them. C.bonnick (talk) 23:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok im sorry, i take this information on board. I have just seen it like this next to other garages. Could you please not delete my piece about routes 103 and 175 being retained because this is reliable info and i have linked it up with a reliable website now and theres nothing wrong with it. Im not putting underneath like the other info simply because thats in the History section and its not history. When it is history then i will move it there. Thankyou. Busman360 (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but the reason why I remove the routes being retained because it's not really needed and we put buses in the history because it is kind of part history and that's where should remain. C.bonnick (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

If thats the way you want it then so be it, but it is very misleading for users of wikipedia. Im not writing my info there because of this. Wouldnt the best thing to do, is move the info there after the date has passed, then leave it for a few weeks or whatever and then scrub it off? Just a suggestion. Busman360 (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I guess it is misleading so maybe we do your way put retain routes in the history section after the date has passed. C.bonnick (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to First London. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)