User talk:Busrider85

brain
Hi -- I'd like to explain that I reversed the changes you made, partly because the sources are not strong enough (see WP:MEDRS), but more importantly because details of this sort don't belong in such a high-level article even if there are sources to validate them. A more appropriate place is Alzheimer's disease, but I expect that the editors who work on that article will have issues with the sourcing too, unless stronger sources can be found. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Handicap principle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Coaster lover  1994  05:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Interleukin, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Novangelis (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)