User talk:BusterD/Archive 3

Floating TOC
Thanks... I think that helps a lot... I hated how there was a blank section where the TOC is located... on the military brat article Balloonman 16:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * PS what did you think of the article? Any recommendations?  Any places where you thought the wording could be improved?  My goal is to get this to FA status... so I am open for even the most trivial of nitpicks.Balloonman 18:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm a big fan of TOCright when a long infobox or image interferes with TOC and page flow. BTW, I'm also a military brat (sold Navy Times on Pearl Harbor docks when I was ten), and my first instinct was to make changes, not give feedback. I was excited to see the article for the first time this am, and after some more careful reading I'd be glad to provide feedback. BusterD 18:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent... feel free to make changes... I'm of the opinion that the more people who edit/comment on the article the better. Either way it's fine by me.Balloonman 19:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Your remedies
I have responded here. Although I appreciate your attempt at a suitable resolution which everyone can agree on, it doesn't seem to address the fact that the Arbcom has not come up with clear cases for desysopping. And I especially object to punishing MONGO for unprotecting a page he was not editing. User:Zoe|(talk) 16:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

If the ArbCom would care to provide evidence of the behavior they are condemning, and if they get rid of the punishment of protecting a page he wasn't editing (which can backlash against ALL of us), then we have grounds to talk. Until then, I can't see any middle ground. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Editor review/, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

A source in NY
Hi BusterD

Do have time to help the African military history project a bit? Mozambican War of Independence could be one of our next FAs, but it needs some more sourcing. One of the sources is in the NY public library, see here for more information. Thank you Wandalstouring 12:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Question
As liaison between Science task force and historiography, I have a question. I have worked extensively on the Venona project series, which is used twice in the Science task force Categorization scheme. I would like to join one or the other group, and need some assistance in the form of guidance and planning. Would you be kind enough to offer some advice as I have not participated in a WikiProject before and would like to contribute. Thank you. nobs 22:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007
The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Heads Up
74.118.33.254 vandalized your page several Times just wanted to let you know--St.daniel 02:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Military History elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of unassessed articles tagged with. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 20:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

British anti-invasion preparations of World War II
I thought that you might like to know that British anti-invasion preparations of World War II, an article to which you have previously contributed, has been put forward as a featured article candidate. Thank you for your help. If you would like to comment on this article's nomination, please see here. Your opinions will be most welcome. Gaius Cornelius 12:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 18:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)
The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
 WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive! WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award. There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards,  Psych less Type  words! .

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)
The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline
Contributions invited and welcome. The editors who've been keeping up on this have a little of fatigue, and the "rest of life" is intervening. Your continuing contributions are invited. -- Yellowdesk 21:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Tally
Hi -- I saw here you're collecting data from a 1982 BLP sample. I think the results may well be informative. If I can help (e.g. by doing some of the legwork) please let me know. Avb 22:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Contribution
Hello. I am currently trying to contribute to a battle in respect to giving a reason why a Viking force had to withdraw from a native attack, which I think was instrumental to the article itself and since the person in question received her place in history for that act. Its my understanding that Wikipedia is meant for contributions, but the people at that region see fit to leave the situation vague. They have told me that I cannot simply copy and past from references and, in short order, I re-wrote the small addition in my own words. I don't see what the problem here is, however, they simply revert my edits and give me vague conclusion to why they have done so. The site is intended to be used for non-commercial reproduction so we have no problems in copyright infringement. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. InternetHero 22:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: ACW
You might want to consider sending the portal to WP:FPCAN at this point. :-) Kirill 17:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)
The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Mexican-American War
WP:PROT might be an option here, as might WP:RFCU. Kirill 02:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Tor? Then checkuser would likely help quite a bit; editing through Tor is prohibited, so any nodes he's using can be blocked on sight anyways. Kirill 18:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Dominionism POV tag
Thank you for stepping in and doing this. Several POV-warriors like Odd nature and Felonious Monk are making life difficult for the serious editors there. Thanks again. --profg 03:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Lomax
I just happened to sign onto Wiki after getting back from Gettysburg (I had a series of book signings today - very cool!) and noticed the bio page was CSA -1, so I checked out your Lunsford article. Nice start! I tweaked it a little bit with a couple of cats and several links. I like the portal, by the way! Keep up the good work. It is appreciated. Scott Mingus 23:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Saturday November 3, 2007 New York City Meetup
You have expressed interest in creating a Wikimedia New York City. Please have a look at Meetup/NYC, the meetup for Saturday November 3, 2007, where it is hoped we can actually get a local chapter started.--Pharos 07:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Sock Puppets
No problem. I was just patrolling the user creation log (as I tend to do, among other counter-vandalism patrols, when I'm bored at work), and I saw those four usernames created in the span of about two minutes. This raised a red flag in my mind, but since there were no contribs, I wasn't sure if I should make a sock puppet report. I flagged down an admin who made the report. I guess the sock puppeteer was waiting out the four day time period before he could edit a protected article?

I'll be watching this case on and off, but I will be out of town this weekend and I'm not sure I'll have reliable internet access. --Tckma 13:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I am not an admin, but I am the one who made the report on behalf of User:Tckma.  I'll definitely be keeping an eye on this one. - Rjd0060 14:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Lots of eyes open now. Hope we get to the very bottom here. Thanks to all non-admin concerned wikicitizens. Don't need a mop to clean up. BusterD 14:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello from DonDesignJr
Hello BusterD, Sensei48, TabascoMan77, Golbez

BusterD you do make me feel welcome. However we have unintentionally stepped on a few toes (I should say fingers, typing fingers). We have suspended our Wikipedia activities. We will corporate even without the threat of banishment. We believe the other editors are as supportive to tenderFoots (tenderFingers) as you and Sensei48 are, even though they did pounce pretty hard, and rightly so.

SPAM DEFINED. BusterD and Golbez thanks for explaining spam as it pertains to Wikipedia. I knew of the common definition of spam but not this meaning. I was surprised. If TabascoMan77 or Golbez had used the term WikiSpam or used BusterD's link to spam, it would have made me investigate the meaning, and I would have found it instantly in Wikipedia. Whereas spam left me puzzled: "What spam? I didn't spam!"

Why use the word spam? I don’t see a sufficient connection to share the word. I declare a misnomer. I can think of several more relevant, descriptive names.

WikiSpam I DID. I saw the ability to add links and thought that implied permission. At the very least, it implied adding links was not totally taboo. It didn't occur to me that links in the body of your articles link only to Wikipedia articles. Sorry.

RE-WRITES. Sensei48, of course you are correct about the re-write. When searching for information, my first click is on the big "W" on my bookmark bar, because I know Wikipedia's information is enormous and not tainted with bias such as mine and has links to "Points-of-View" sites such as ours. However, I dedicate most of my time to achieving the Goals set forth by Ideas4Humanity.com (see External Links) and am driven by forces that appear daily without warning, so I may not return to The Little Bighorn for sometime, especially not knowing that it will be approved. But foremost, I don't have the skill to switch from writing on one side of the fence to walking on top of the fence with my bias lean. Perhaps that is a reason for the original research rule.

MODIFIED OUR COPYRIGHTS. We have several articles that may interest your readers as excerpts or External Links. For our List of All Articles see our External Links at the end of this message. And since it would be beneficial to your readers, Wikipedia editors, and aid in accomplishing our goals, we have decided to modify our Copyright Reprint Permission to offer Wikipedia editors our information to use or not use as they see fit (see External Links). If there are any changes you want, let us know.

If one of the Wikipedia pros edits in some of our material, there would be no original research violations.

LINKS BACK AND FORTH. We have been adding links from our articles to Wikipedia. We will add many more. Wikipedia is a powerful resource, thanks to you folks.

Would it be OK for us to add links from your External Links sections to our articles, with link deletion being the worse action your editors take?

ALL EDITORS. Would you pass this message to all Wikipedia editors? Or tell me how to do it, if it is permitted.

MORE THAN WELCOMED. We feel more than welcomed. We feel honored to be known by the Bakers of Wikipedia's Bread of Knowledge.

EXTERNAL LINKS:
 * Goals:
 * List All Articles:
 * Permission:

Cheerio! Don.

DonDesignJr Spokesperson for: Ideas4Humanity.com DonDesignJr 22:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

NYC meetup change of schedule
You've expressed an interest in the upcoming New York City Meetup for Saturday, November 3. I'd like to update you on an important change of schedule. This will be in addition to the previously scheduled roving activities at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (this activity has also been cut short a bit) and at the Brooklyn Museum. For full details, see Meetup/NYC. Ask any questions at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC. Thank you.--Pharos 21:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's been agreed that we should have a 2-hour formal meeting period to start organizing Wikimedia New York City, and this will be held at the Pacific Library (note this is different from the Brooklyn Central Library, which was discussed earlier) from 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM.

Hello badge
Hi. I made a Wiki Hello badge in case anyone's interested in using it for the Meetup. It's on the Meetup page. Nightscream 16:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)