User talk:ButterCashier/Archive 2

Ben Klassen
You need to behave collaborately, not issue veiled threats.

There is a duscussion on the title at Talk: Ben Klassen. If you think that it is an inappropriate title, discuss it there, not on my talk page.47.137.179.4 (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chemical properties of Mr. Spock's fake ears


A tag has been placed on Chemical properties of Mr. Spock's fake ears, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Asparagusus  (interaction)  13:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * See essay No one really cares for more info. ButterCashier (talk) 13:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Chemical properties of Mr. Spock's fake ears
Why did you recreate that article? OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. I was testing what would happen and thought if someone deleted it (as they should), I would see a useful template for how to delete articles. ButterCashier (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In the future, please ask at the village pump rather than doing something disruptive. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That is probably a good idea. ButterCashier (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Damar Services moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Damar Services. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 14:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I found that page on the New pages feed and tried to help improve it. It's not my article, although I contributed more than anyone else. Your move to draft was a wise idea, I think. ButterCashier (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Why deleted my article.
Article was have some mistakes I can change this.@ButterCashier Keyboard of list (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I noticed you created a page called Taekwondo,Karate but there already exists a page for both sports, so I didn't think this new version was necessary. If you think otherwise, you can create the article but I suggest making a draft first. Alternatively, you might want to check the pages that already exist and edit those. ButterCashier (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! ButterCashier (talk) 11:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. You do a lot as well. ButterCashier (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Request for advice, Possible edit warring (April 2023)
Hi, I'm new to wikipedia and to date my activity has been mostly anti-vandalism, but there appears to be an edit war happening in Hillsdale, Michigan. IP 96.61.97.209 has repeatedly blanked a section insisting that it does not meet the ground for notability, and I am unsure of the protocol here, i have already put the uw-3rr on their talk, but do i revert the blanking? Any advice would be appreciated. - FenrisAureus ▼  ( talk ) 00:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! From what I can tell, a version of that page has been written where there is a smaller section for the part that IP editor was blanking. I don't think their edits were entirely vandalism, since perhaps the text they were removing was not all relevant. I'm using Rollback to revert blanking. If any user wants to use this tool, it's suggested they have at least 200 edits and a history of good editing. Since you're fairly new to Wikipedia, I recommend you gain a little more experience on this website before requesting it. There's plenty of pages to edit over many sections as I wrote on your talk page. There's other tools you can use as well, such as RedWarn, but either way I recommend you get a bit more experience first. Thanks for your inquiry. ButterCashier (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

History of anatomy
Is this link of sushuruta samahita accurate version for the article. https://archive.org/details/englishtranslati00susruoft/page/139/mode/1up David dclork li (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I'm not sure about that, but the source is valid from what I can see. ButterCashier (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you! ButterCashier (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Genocide Denier On My Talk Page - Please Advise
There is an IP with a long history of genocide denial mad at me on my talk page for reverting their edit for NPOV. What should I do? My reply to their post on my talk page was some variant of fuck off and a quote from WP:YWAB, but I would like advice on how to deal with this IP more generally. - FenrisAureus ▼  ( talk ) 08:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! Informing an IP user why their edit has been reverted (in this case, since it wasn't seen as neutral) is a good idea. The message they left on your talk page wasn't so much specifically about why they thought their edit was accurate as much as a general criticism of this website. I don't think that really required much of a response since they weren't making a point so much as stating their overall opinion. Responding to a criticism about neutrality with an opinionated essay seems less useful than referring to an actual guideline since it alludes to their point about this website being run on a non-neutral system. Still, I don't think the IP user had much of a good point so your response was fine enough, I think. ButterCashier (talk) 07:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * For future reference (not for this specific case, just in general) how would you recommend I answer comments like this in the future? Thanks! - FenrisAureus ▼  ( talk ) 07:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Perhaps ask them to be more specific about how their edit fixed something from being non-neutral rather than a paragraph of complaints about this website in general. Responding with an essay, rather than a guideline, is probably not something I would do. Lots of other people could probably tell you better advice. ButterCashier (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! - FenrisAureus ▼  ( talk ) 12:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Loreto Secondary School - advice please.
Would you have a look at this if you have a mo .Loreto Secondary School

I'm fairly new at this and advice is always welcome.

This revision has blanked a lot as uncited but looking at the schools website it seems good.

Does this sort of thing need citation and if it does would it not be better to put the appropriate template at the top and leave the information.

Many thanks.

LWB Lukewarmbeer (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! In general, it's best to have citations for what is written on a page. A list of notable alumni may not require citations as much since if a person is deemed notable, they may have a page, confirming their notability. Even if the information that was on this page fitted with what the school website said, perhaps it was considered too much specific detail, rather than an overall encyclopaedic view. I'm not sure what kind of template you may suggest should be used, were the information to remain, and perhaps some of it should since the most recent edit changed the total number of students without a citation anyway. But overall I think it's better to have information that can be confirmed to be valid without extraneous points that may be irrelevant. ButterCashier (talk) 07:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Is the schools own site sufficient confirmation? Lukewarmbeer (talk) 09:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Generally yes. ButterCashier (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Appreciated. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

 * Thanks! I just had some as well. ButterCashier (talk) 10:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Incorrect reasons given on your recent revert
Hello. You recently reverted my removal of a paragraph from Tolkien fandom, and left a default message on my talk page claiming that I removed content without providing an accurate edit summary with my reasons. You then immediately contradicted this by adding that your reason for reverting my edit is that you personally consider the site noteworthy. That's not how wikipedia works. If Theonering.com is notable, surely there are reliable secondary sources talking about it, as in the case of Theonering.net. Yet the only reference given was the TORc's very own about page. Tolkien fandom has a talk page. if you think TORc is notable, we can discuss it there, though I highly doubt you will find any reliable source giving any real notability to a website that uses it's social media account to enable and signal-boost internet trolls. 46.97.170.151 (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I did think, immediately after having written to you, that it sounded rather contradictory but hoped the basic point was clear, that I think the website is a notable inclusion for relevance in the Tolkien fandom page. I thought Theonering.net was the website you were removing information for, actually, not Theonering.com - I was until now unaware that there was another website with an altered suffix for its URL! This can't be evidence that the page isn't notable, however. Perhaps you are correct in that Theonering.com isn't notable, it is at least clearly less notable than Theonering.net. Maybe this merits further discussion as you suggest. ButterCashier (talk) 11:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)


 * It is indeed a different website, and knowing the kind of people who congregate around Theonering.com, it wouldn't surprise me that the confusion is intentional. There's a massive disparity between how the two sites are talked about, seeing as TORn is the closest thing we have to an official website of the Tolkien Fandom, and has wide spread mainstream recognition, whereas TORc is run by a couple of podcast bros who mainly just whine about "wokeness", in-between inciting harrassment on social media, and is virtually unknown outside the gamergate crowd. 46.97.170.151 (talk) 13:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the .com variant - if you think it isn't notable enough to be included on the page you should refer all future edits concerning that to the Tolkien fandom page. I apologise if my edit was enacted too hastily (Hrum, hoom). ButterCashier (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your revert on Sophie Morgan
You reverted Special:Contribs/82.16.229.231's good edit and restored the vandalism done by Special:Contribs/86.26.153.4. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 15:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing my mistake, I'll try not to go wrong in the future (experienced as I am in it). ButterCashier (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, although I'm sure some other users are not entirely deceitful, contrary to expectations. ButterCashier (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I don't know if my barnstar was a bit excessive, because I see at least 15 barnstars on your talk page. // 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 08:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks all the same and thanks for the work you do here! ButterCashier (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

why did it said you reverted my edit on the bikes
i got this notification and it said you undid my edit and i looked at it said you did and it said this talkpage and i wondered why you would revert the edit because i worked hard and long on the edit for it to be revert. PoopMoney23 (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I reverted your edit on the Bicycle-sharing system page because it didn't seem to add much substantially to the page. It wasn't cited either - Wikipedia is an enclyclopaedia where it's important to cite information. Otherwise, anyone could make anything up and no one would know what is or isn't true! That's why I reverted your edit. You can find out more about editing here. I wish you good luck in your future editing. ButterCashier (talk) 14:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! ButterCashier (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

RedWarn tip
Because you have rollback you may want to enable rollback usage rather than rollback like (undo). You can do this going to settings and behavior and then you can find it there. Thanks, Zippybonzo &#124; Talk (he&#124;him) 16:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

 * Thank you! I didn't do any on the day you sent me this though. ButterCashier (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Gee Whillickers
What be the matter with ya? What didda do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.27.118 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Bryan Freedman
Hi. Not really sure what I did wrong. I seem to detail why I erase something and put references to what I add. Pestalozzi90 (talk) 07:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I only saw your most recent edit on the Bryan Freedman page, which was a quotation without a clear citation. Now I see there was a citation preceding it, I judged too hastily. The quote wasn't written fully correctly - combining this with the supposed lack of citation explains my revert. I have restored your version, fixing a missing space. Apologies. ButterCashier (talk) 07:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, I got it. And thank you for your anti-vandalism efforts, too! Pestalozzi90 (talk) 08:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Polium (console)


Hello, ButterCashier. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete delete delete!!! ButterCashier (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Automatic archiving
Currently, you're archiving config has no  parameter set. The archiving bot will refuse to archive a page if the given archive parameter isn't a subpage of the current page or if none is provided, meaning that currently, no automatic archiving will take place. There's some more info at on the details, but if you'd like automatic archiving, you should add   to the template. Note that you have it set to archive any thread within 3 days of inactivity and have no minimum amount of threads kept, so every thread currently on this page is probably eligible for archiving right now, so you may want to reduce its aggressiveness before fixing it if that's not what you're after. Aidan9382 (talk) 08:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for editing! I'm not entirely sure how to do that, I added another part at the start. ButterCashier (talk) 09:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Please see private reply left on message sent to me
Please see a private reply messaged to you. Thank you so much Tacoginger26 (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Study invitation
Hey ButterCashier, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. That sounds interesting, I'm not sure whether I will be available for ten days but perhaps. It's nice to know some such study is going on. Thank you for informing me. Also, if you're interested in fixing mistakes, you should probably be aware that headings on Wikipedia use sentence case. ButterCashier (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing me to the page about using sentence cases! I just fixed the heading. Meanwhile, we reduce the study period from 2 to 1 week, where people may choose to participate in any 5 out of the 7 days. I hope that helps! Tzusheng (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)