User talk:Butterfly2011

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Being a member of the welcoming committee on Wikipedia I encourage you to help Wikipedia in any way you can to increase human

knowledge. No matter how small you may know about a topic, check it out on Wiki, if you find it, add to it or make changes backed with references. If there is no

article on that topic, why not start it, with time others will add to it and it may even make the featured articles list. Furthermore, I encourage you to aim to be a member of the [|Auto confirmed users] as this will greatly improve your Wiki experience. You can do this by making at least 10 edits on Wikipedia and remaining on Wiki for four (4) days. Check out this page for tips.Crosstemplejay 16:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC) crosstemplejay

2011 Kurdish protests in Turkey
Hey, I reverted your edit to 2011 Kurdish protests in Turkey. Would you like to explain your rationale for replacing the entire contents of the page with an outdated version that was riddled with numerous WP:ORIGINAL, WP:NPOV, etc., violations? Cheers. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This isn't going to work. I asked you nicely, and now I'm going to be more direct: stop vandalizing the page. -Kudzu1 (talk) 22:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd appreciate a response from you. I'd like to at least know why you keep doing this. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kurdish protests in Turkey ‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kuru   (talk)  00:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Kuru  (talk)  00:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, I reverted your edit here. I understand your concern, but you really mustn't make edits that are very much against policy. I am sorry there are not more sources reporting on the Turkish barbarism, but we have to keep the article in-line with Wikipedia policy. Cheers and good luck. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 23:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Allegations of excessive EU self-promotion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of excessive EU self-promotion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allegations of excessive EU self-promotion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jll (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of EU Propaganda


The article EU Propaganda has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at EU Propaganda, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sparthorse (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I am a graduate student, studying International Relations & Foreign Propaganda, and have created this entry for a school project. All of the sources that I have used are documented, and in no way is this wiki entry an attempt to create my own propaganda. I have no axe to grind, and am simply doing school work. I will actually have to present this page in front of my class and the professor for a grade, so it behooves me to be scholarly. I would greatly appreciate if you would not take this site down, but instead, please help me find additional sources to make it as scholarly as possible.

I appreciate your help and understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Butterfly2011 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 16 November 2011‎
 * Wikipedia is not a free web host, and is not to be used for holding your school work. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about EU Propaganda
Hello, Butterfly2011, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/EU Propaganda whether the article EU Propaganda should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving EU Propaganda, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Sparthorse (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EU Propaganda


A tag has been placed on EU Propaganda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 02:43, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on EU Propaganda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 12:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeatedly creating an unsuitable article, despite a discussion resulting in its deletion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)