User talk:ButterflyChange

Jargon
I have a very good command of the English language, but looking at Phronesis antenarrating I fail to see what the heck it is about. Do you think a section in English rather than Jargon could be added to explain the subject? Cheers. Peridon (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I just hope you will see this as I do not know yet whether this is right place to answer to your remark. Essentially, it is a very good remark of course. But, fact is that Phronesis Antenarrating and Phronesis Antenarrative (the other notion) are both not easy to explain in short text as it involves A LOT. As it is mentioned, Phonesis Antenarrative is specific type of antenarrative. There is already information on antenarrative on wikipedia. It is a notion for pre-story. A bet on the future. This pre-story can be written text or thoughts/sensemaking. Then also the referred text will be important being the first text where the relatively new but really great notion of phronesis antenarrating is further explained. It has to be published still but that will be soon.

Fact is that the new book by David Boje will give a lot of persons a lot of in depth understandings about Antenarrating and Storytelling in management and organizations. Which is a good addition for understanding about Phronesis Antenarrating.

I will however for sure do what you said, adding as much as possible more clear explanations in near future
 * Yes, but... Is it for regulating the economy of nations, 'improving' advertisements, training actors, or choosing stories to read to five year olds? Peridon (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phronesis antenarrating


A tag has been placed on Phronesis antenarrating requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Travelbird (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * If you wish to permit the use of copyrighted text on Wikipedia, you will need to follow the instructions indicated above. Be advised, though, that anything posted on Wikipedia may be repeatedly and mercilessly edited by anyone on the planet, and you will have no control over the matter. Many copyright holders are reluctant to release their materials for precisely that reason. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Your addition to Storytelling organization has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. O Fenian (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2011 (UTC)