User talk:Butterflynet

January 2008
Your recent edit to Nirmala Srivastava (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sahaja Yoga. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sahaja Yoga was changed by Butterflynet (c) (t) deleting 22523 characters on 2008-01-12T00:32:48+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Shri Mataji has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 05:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Nirmala Srivastava constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.  Snowolf How can I help? 15:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nirmala Srivastava. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Scarian Call me Pat 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)