User talk:Butters651vt6

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. — Aetheling (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Batman's principle
A tag has been placed on Batman's principle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Zelse81 (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC) hangon

Friendly advice
Okay, it seems that you want to create a new biological principle, to be called "Batman's Principle", and you want it to replace the well-known and well-documented "Bateman's Principle".

Here is the problem: there are no published references in the biological literature to anything known as "Batman's Principle". Without a citation to the established scientific literature, your new page will be speedily deleted.

If you really want to create a new biological principle, then write it up as a scientific paper and submit it to a peer-reviewed journal. If it is accepted for publication, then you can create a page on Wikipedia that describes your new principle. Short of this, I am afraid your attempts to create a new biological principle using Wikipedia are doomed. — Aetheling (talk) 05:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

SECOND WARNING
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Aetheling (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC).

Hey Butters,
Looking good with the edits. I do, however, think that your talent would be better suited to Encyclopedia Dramatica, or, perhaps, Uncyclopedia (to the dark side you must go, my child).  phentostc —Preceding undated comment added 19:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC).