User talk:Buttons0603/2021

January 2021
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at 2019 Totnes bus crash. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pre Metro Operations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pre Metro Operations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pre Metro Operations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 01:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Please go away. Buttons0603 (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If I find an article that doesn’t meet notability guidelines I’m not just going to leave it like it is just because I have an editing dispute with its creator. You should express your argument to keep on the AfD citing policy. Thanks. SK2242 (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Please. Create your article over the redirect
Hi. . Please overwrite the redirect (this), not the article. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Arundel Gate moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arundel Gate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Arundel Gate moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arundel Gate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of MCV EvoTor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MCV EvoTor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MCV EvoTor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:TLC Travel
Hello, Buttons0603. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TLC Travel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TLC Travel


Hello, Buttons0603. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TLC Travel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Page move of Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal
I have undone your page move of Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal as there is no consensus for the name you moved it to. On April 6, 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal. The result of the discussion was Article moved, per consensus.. Noah Talk 19:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Additionally, Irene-Olivia and Fifi-Orlene crossed as full-strength tropical cyclones, while Amanda weakened into a tropical low before becoming Cristobal. This is basically the Kiev/Kyiv of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, so don't move it again. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me!  10:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Should the S in Storms at least be capitalised for it to be gramatically correct? Right now it looks lazy. Buttons0603 (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You can start a discussion on the talk page about that, but I doubt it'll pass. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me!  12:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, if it won't pass then I won't bother. It's not that big of an issue, and could cause more problems. I've read the discussion now, which I wasn't aware of when I made the move. Buttons0603 (talk) 12:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arundel Gate
Hello, Buttons0603. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arundel Gate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Page move
Re - so why is 'eruption' more precise than 'volcanic eruption'? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I was referring to the place name (Cumbre Vieja over La Palma). Since Cumbre Vieja is just a volcano, I figured "volcanic" was redundant. But if you feel it's better, you can change it. Buttons0603 (talk) 19:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that! '2021 Cumbre Vieja eruption' seems OK to me, but others may disagree (see the talk page discussion). I'd still like to see 'volcanic' somewhere in there to indicate the type of eruption, if possible. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)