User talk:Buuzbashi

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page ExxonMobil, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sinopec
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sinopec, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Buuzbashi&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1208264183 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinopec&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1208264183%7CSinopec%5D%5D Ask for help])

February 2024
Thanks for contributing to the article Glencore. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 20:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Do I understand correctly that the problem is unreliable sources? I mean, the data on news agency websites are based on company press releases? Or the articles cited as sources do not confirm the information on the Wikipedia page? ```` Buuzbashi (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It was the lack of a citation relating to the additional material on Argentina. But I have added a citation. Dormskirk (talk) 23:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petrobras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daito Trust Construction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City Developments Limited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asia-Pacific region.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VF Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your edits
Hello, I've undone most of your recent edits because they're completely inappropriate. Wikipedia sums up what reliable secondary sources have to say about a subject, not primary-source company press releases. Your editing pattern is ... more than a little unusual for a new user; have you previously had an account here? Is anyone paying/inducing you to make the edits you're making? Graham87 (talk) 04:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m sorry, I don’t get paid for the changes and I don’t get encouraged to do them. I like to make changes, I like to watch my contributions grow. Unfortunately, I missed the moment when Wikipedia became a source of cheap dopamine for me. The moment something gets out of control at work, I go into the Wiki, do a few edits and rejoice at my contribution - "I feel like I did a good thing". I really tried to choose useful information - financial indicators or important stages for business. In the pursuit of simplicity and a lot of revisions, I was reduced to a routine job and careless to sources. It was so important for me to add data that I thought the financial results could be taken from the press releases, as well as some news. But in general I tried to take data from industry publications and global and local news resources. In any case, I will reconsider my approach to editing Wikipedia to a smaller amount, but better quality is really important to me. I appreciate you talking to me in a friendly way.
 * As for my style of editing, I have a little experience in editing (a few years ago from a friend’s account corrected several articles about fantasy). Because of the features of the work I have a very long experience in the preparation of the most different documentation. Thank you again for attention and goodwill.
 * And since we are still communicating and your experience in the project is very large, maybe you can immediately answer me. Can the annual report of a company be a source of financial data for a Wikipedia page? Buuzbashi (talk) 10:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply; sounds fair enough. It's much better to update financial data in the infobox rather than in the article body (and annual reports are a perfectly good source for that). The history section is especially not a good place for such information. When adding something to an article, it's a good idea to research it as thoroughly as possible, especially because a single news story/press release may not tell the whole story. If you have further questions about Wikipedia you can ask them at the teahouse. Graham87 (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)