User talk:Buxbaum666

now why did you delete my edits, sir? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.63.143 (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Because they were identified as vandalism. --Buxbaum666 (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Mulamoottil Family prod
Howdy, I deleted the prod on Mulamoottil Family. I think it asserts notability, and it has one reference after a fashion (poorly cited). I improved the article a bit with wikilinks and headings, and marked it as a stub in some reasonably popular categories, so someone should pick it up. You might want to check on it in 5 days, and if it still suffers, then prod it again, or even mark it for speedy deletion with if you still feel it doesn't assert notability (and that one could not easily alter it to do so).

This is why I did not mark it for deletion when I was patrolling: I believe the topic is either made up or inherently notable (I don't know enough Indian culture to know if there is such a family, but if there ever was, it is likely notable due to the rigid caste system, etc. think of it like a royal family). Since he cites a source (poorly), one assumes it is not made up. Many articles on Indian history have very poor wikilinks, structure, punctuation, etc. I tend to think of it as our job as new page patrollers to fix them up as much as we can in one or two minutes, since we know more about the wikipedia process. The original author provides us with content we could not otherwise get (without spending weeks in a library reading things we are not interested in), and we provide the technical fix-ups they would have to spend weeks editing wikipedia to figure out. JackSchmidt (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright, let's see how this one turns out. --Buxbaum666 (talk) 13:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Your user page
I made an edit to your user page to correct IP vandalism. Best, --S.dedalus (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Buxbaum666 (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Paper crane
I just restored the redirect. Thanks for the notice. --UsaSatsui (talk) 21:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)