User talk:Buxtehude2002

Sourcing
If you want to describe the education provided with a judgemental adjective like "rigorous", that's fine, as long as you can find and quote a reliable third-party source that describes the training that way. If you can't, we can't include it in the article. Please refer to WP:NPOV for further explanation.Kww (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There weren't any sources in the article that you pointed me to, so I tagged it as needing cleanup. I deleted your change again. Please don't put it back until you can source it.Kww (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ''Please consider what others are asking. It is most important for info to be verifiable. Sometimes things are left in that shouldn't be but when they do get challenged, either leave the info out or provide a reference.'' NrDg 21:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Zac Efron
If there are reliable sources, put it to good use. Who am I to determine if it is official? It's strange that Efron doesn't have one, but an official site is a site made by a label/representative for Efron, not some fan. There is no gray area when it comes to this. миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Try to show some civility next time, thanks. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

3RR policy
Just a warning to make sure that you are aware: four reverts of a page in 24 hours will get your account blocked from editing. If you revert Zac Efron again, you will be in violation. Please read WP:3RR for details.Kww (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

"authority"
I've got no more "authority" on content issues than any other editor. Being an admin doesn't always make me right, or even let me act like I am. This time, though, I'm pretty sure that I am. To state that someone's occupation is a singer means that that is the way he derives his living. In Efron's case, they had to blend his vocals in the HSM movies because he couldn't sing well enough to carry the part. His "singing" roles have centered around satires of the HSM. He's an actor that occasionally sings. Not like Julie Andrews, for example, who was a well known actor and singer that starred Broadway musicals as well as dramatic movies.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sando Nebieridze


Hello, Buxtehude2002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sando Nebieridze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)